Advertisement

A computed tomography study of the fibula: morphology, morphometry, intramedullary anatomy, application prospects on intramedullary nailing

  • I. BazinEmail author
  • M. Armendariz
  • P. S. Marcheix
  • M. Pichon
  • F. Fredon
  • C. Mabit
  • P. A. Mathieu
Original Article
  • 7 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

The intramedullary percutaneous pinning in fractures of the lateral malleolus is a technique of osteosynthesis that can reduce complications of ORIF. Our study describes the morphology and the morphometry of the fibula, in particular intramedullary, so as to specify the best fibular nail features.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study on CT acquisitions of fibulae in vivo. We studied total length, and the distal malleolar angle. Regarding intramedullary morphology, six axial study levels were defined. Each level was assigned a morphometric classification (oval, triangular, quadrangular or irregular), and a measure of the diameter of the cavity. The distance between the smaller diameter and the malleolar tip was investigated.

Results

We included 50 patients for 97 fibulae. The average age was 66.5 years. The irregular morphology type was the most frequently found. The average length was 370.5 mm (SD = 18.1; CI 95% [366.9; 374.1]), the average distal malleolar angle was 163.5° (SD = 3.7; CI 95% [162.7; 164.2]). The average minimal intramedullary diameter at malleolus level was 3.2 mm (SD = 1.2; CI 95% [3.0; 3.5]), with a minimum size reaching 95.8 mm (SD = 13.8; CI 95% [93.0; 98.5]) of the malleolar tip.

Conclusions

The analysis of morphological parameters of the fibula, in particular the lateral malleolus and intramedullary morphology is necessary for the design of a morpho-adapted nail. Interpersonal variability must be taken into account by the implant industry to offer nails of suited lengths and diameters.

Keywords

Fibula Intramedullary Morphology Morphometry Nailing Anatomy 

Notes

Author contributions

IB, manuscript writing/editing. MA, other rereading. PSM, other rereading. MP, data collection or management. FF, other rereading. CM, protocol/project development. PAM, protocol/project development.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study formal consent is not required.

References

  1. 1.
    Asloum Y, Bedin B, Roger T, Charissoux J-L, Arnaud J-P, Mabit C (2014) Internal fixation of the fibula in ankle fractures. A prospective, randomized and comparative study: plating versus nailing. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 100(4):255–259.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2014.03.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boyd JB, Caton AM, Mulholland RS, Tong L, Granzow JW (2013) The sensate fibula osteocutaneous flap: neurosomal anatomy. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 66(12):1688–1694.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2013.07.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bugler KE, Watson CD, Hardie AR et al (2012) The treatment of unstable fractures of the ankle using the Acumed fibular nail: development of a technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94(8):1107–1112.  https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.94B8.28620 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Challagundla SR, Shewale S, Cree C, Hawkins A (2017) Intramedullary fixation of lateral malleolus using Fibula Rod System in ankle fractures in the elderly. Foot Ankle Surg S 1268–7731(17):30093–300100.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2017.04.015 Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Choi SW, Kim HJ, Koh KS, Chung IH, Cha IH (2001) Topographical anatomy of the fibula and peroneal artery in Koreans. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 30(4):329–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Court-Brown CM, McBirnie J, Wilson G (1998) Adult ankle fractures—an increasing problem? Acta Orthop Scand 69(1):43–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Daly PJ, Fitzgerald RH, Melton LJ, Ilstrup DM (1987) Epidemiology of ankle fractures in Rochester, Minnesota. Acta Orthop Scand 58(5):539–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dehghan N, Schemitsch EH (2017) Intramedullary nail fixation of non-traditional fractures: clavicle, forearm, fibula. Injury 1:S41–S46.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2017.04.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Forch S, Franz U, Mayr E (2017) Locked retrograde fibula nail for the surgical tretment of unstable ankle fractures. Oper Orthop Traumatol 29(6):483–491.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00064-017-0510-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Golas AR, Levine JP, Ream J, Rodriguez ED (2016) Aberrant lower extremity arterial anatomy in microvascular free fibula flap candidates: management algorithm and case presentations. J Craniofac Surg 27(8):2134–2137.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000003220 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ide Y, Matsunaga S, Harris J, O’ Connell D, Seikaly H, Wolfaardt J (2015) Anatomical examination of the fibula: digital imaging study for osseointegrated implant installation. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 3:44–51.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40463-015-0055-9 Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jain S, Haughton BA, Brew C (2014) Intramedullary fixation of distal fibular fractures: a systematic review of clinical and functional outcomes. J Orthop Traumatol 15(4):245–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jensen SL, Andresen BK, Mencke S, Nielsen PT (1998) Epidemiology of ankle fractures. A prospective population-based study of 212 cases in Aalborg, Denmark. Acta Orthop Scand 691:48–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lynde MJ, Sautter T, Hamilton GA, Schuberth JM (2012) Complications after open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures in the elderly. Foot Ankle Surg 18(2):103–107.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2011.03.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mabit C, Salanne P, Boncoeur-Martel MP et al (1996) The lateral retromalleolar groove: a radio-anatomic study. Bull Assoc Anat 80(249):17–21Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mak KH, Chan KM, Leung PC (1985) Ankle fracture treated with the AO principle—an experience with 116 cases. Injury 16(4):265–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mathieu P-A, Marcheix P-S, Hummel V, Valleix D, Mabit C (2014) Anatomical study of the clavicle: endomedullary morphology. Surg Radiol Anat 36(1):11–15.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-013-1140-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Miyamoto S, Kayano S, Nagamatsu S, Sakuraba M (2012) Perforator anatomy of the fibula osteocutaneous flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 129(5):849–850.  https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31824a6326 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rajeev A, Senevirathna S, Radha S, Kashayap NS (2011) Functional outcomes after fibula locking nail for fragility fractures of the ankle. J Foot Ankle Surg 50(5):547–550.  https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2011.04.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Reed GF, Lynn F, Meade BD (2002) Use of coefficient of variation in assessing variability of quantitative assays. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 9(6):1235–1239Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rehman H, McMillan T, Rehman S, Clement A, Finlayson D (2015) Intrmedullary versus extramedullary fixation of lateral malleolus fractures. Int J Surg 22:54–61.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.07.697 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sanders DW, Tieszer C, Corbett B (2012) Canadian Orthopedic Trauma Society. Operative versus nonoperative treatment of unstable lateral malleolar fractures: a randomized multicenter trial. J Orthop Trauman 26(3):129–134.  https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e3182460837 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    SooHoo NF, Krenek L, Eagan MJ, Gurbani B, Ko CY, Zingmond DS (2009) Complication rates following open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(5):1042–1049.  https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.H.00653 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Switaj PJ, Fuchs D, Alshouli M, Patwardhan AG, Voronov LI, Muriuki M, Havey RM, Kadakia AR (2016) A biomechanical comparison study of a modern fibular nail and distal fibular locking plate in AO/OTA 44C2 ankle fractures. J Orthop Surg Res 11(1):100.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-016-0435-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Thammaroj T, Jianmongkol S, Kamanarong K (2007) Vascular anatomy of the proximal fibula from embalmed cadaveric dissection. J Med Assoc Thai 90(5):942–946Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Walton DM, Adams SB, Parekh SG (2016) Intramedullary fixation for fractures of the distal fibula. Foot Ankle Int 37(1):115–123.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100715622392 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yu P, Chang EI, Hanasono MM (2011) Design of a reliable skin paddle for the fibula osteocutaneous flap: perforator anatomy revisited. Plast Reconstr Surg 128(2):440–446.  https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31821e7058 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zaheer U, Granger A, Ortiz A, Terrell M, Loukas M, Schober J (2018) The anatomy of free fibula osteoseptocutaneous flap in neophalloplasty in transgender surgery. Clin Anat 31(2):169–174.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zahid A, Shakir MA, Shireen R (2015) Morphological and topographical anatomy of diaphyseal nutrient foramina of dried Pakistani Fibulae. J Coll Phys Surg Pak 25(8):560–563. https://doi.org/08.2015/JCPSP.560563Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Limoges DupuytrenLimogesFrance

Personalised recommendations