Advertisement

Three-rooted maxillary first premolars incidentally detected on cone beam CT: an in vivo study

  • Andrea BorghesiEmail author
  • Silvia Michelini
  • Angelo Zigliani
  • Ingrid Tonni
  • Roberto Maroldi
Original Article
  • 12 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

To explore the incidence and analyze the morphology of three-rooted maxillary first premolars (MFPs) incidentally detected on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans.

Methods

Of 1328 patients who underwent CBCT scans of the maxilla, only patients with three-rooted MFPs were selected. Morphological features, including the lengths and diameters of palatal, mesiobuccal (MB) and distobuccal (DB) roots, the positions of bucco-palatal (B-P) bifurcations, the distances between root canal bifurcations and cementoenamel junctions (CEJs) and the distances between the apical thirds of the roots, were measured. The canal configuration and the visibility of root canals were also evaluated.

Results

A total of 16/1328 (1.2%) patients had one or two three-rooted MFPs, and a total of 22/2656 (0.8%) three-rooted MFPs were enrolled. The lengths and diameters of palatal roots were significantly greater than those of other roots. The positions of B-P bifurcations were located mainly at the middle third of the root. The median distances between root canal bifurcations and CEJs were 3 mm for B-P bifurcations and 5.2 mm for MB–DB bifurcations. The distance between MB and DB roots was significantly shorter than the distances between other root pairs. All teeth had a type VIII canal configuration. Palatal roots exhibited the best visibility of root canals, whereas the worst visibility was observed within DB roots. A gender-related relationship was observed only for the lengths of the roots.

Conclusions

The occurrence of three-rooted MFPs is not unusual; therefore, preoperative CBCT evaluation could be suggested whenever endodontic procedures are planned on an MFP.

Keywords

Bicuspid Tooth root Anatomic variation Cone-beam computed tomography 

Notes

Author contributions

AB: Project development, Data collection and data analysis, Manuscript writing and editing; SM: Data analysis, Literature research, Manuscript editing; AZ: Data collection, Manuscript editing; IT: Literature research, Manuscript editing; RM: Manuscript editing.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standards

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

This study was retrospective, and it did not alter the management of the patients; thus, no specific consent was required.

References

  1. 1.
    Abella F, Teixidó LM, Patel S, Sosa F, Duran-Sindreu F, Roig M (2015) Cone-beam computed tomography analysis of the root canal morphology of maxillary first and second premolars in a Spanish population. J Endod 41:1241–1247.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.03.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ahmad IA, Alenezi MA (2016) Root and root canal morphology of maxillary first premolars: a literature review and clinical considerations. J Endod 42:861–872.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.02.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alqedairi A, Alfawaz H, Al-Dahman Y, Alnassar F, Al-Jebaly A, Alsubait S (2018) Cone-beam computed tomographic evaluation of root canal morphology of maxillary premolars in a Saudi population. Biomed Res Int.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8170620 Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beltes P, Kalaitzoglou ME, Kantilieraki E, Beltes C, Angelopoulos C (2017) 3-Rooted maxillary first premolars: an ex vivo study of external and internal morphologies. J Endod 43:1267–1272.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.03.045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dashrath K, Nisha A, Subodh S (2015) Root morphology and tooth length of maxillary first premolar in Nepalese population. Dentistry 5:324Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gupta S, Sinha DJ, Gowhar O, Tyagi SP, Singh NN, Gupta S (2015) Root and canal morphology of maxillary first premolar teeth in north Indian population using clearing technique: an in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 18:232–236.  https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.157260 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hartmann RC, Baldasso FE, Stürmer CP, Acauan MD, Scarparo RK, Morgental RD, Bryant S, Dummer PM, de Figueiredo JA, Vier-Pelisser FV (2013) Clinically relevant dimensions of 3-rooted maxillary premolars obtained via high-resolution computed tomography. J Endod 39:1639–1645.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.07.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kocani F, Kamberi B, Dragusha E, Kelmendi T, Sejfija Z (2014) Correlation between anatomy and root canal topography of first maxillary premolar on Kosovar population. Open J Stomatol 4:332–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Li YH, Bao SJ, Yang XW, Tian XM, Wei B, Zheng YL (2018) Symmetry of root anatomy and root canal morphology in maxillary premolars analyzed using cone-beam computed tomography. Arch Oral Biol 94:84–92.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2018.06.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lin Z, Hu Q, Wang T, Ge J, Liu S, Zhu M, Wen S (2014) Use of CBCT to investigate the root canal morphology of mandibular incisors. Surg Radiol Anat 36:877–882.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-014-1267-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lipski M, Wozniak K, Lagocka R, Tomasik M (2005) Root and canal morphology of the first human maxillary premolar. Durh Anthropol J 12:2–3Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Marca C, Dummer PM, Bryant S, Vier-Pelisser FV, Só MV, Fontanella V, Dutra VD, de Figueiredo JA (2013) Three-rooted premolar analyzed by high-resolution and cone beam CT. Clin Oral Investig 17:1535–1540.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0839-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Matherne RP, Angelopoulos C, Kulild JC, Tira D (2008) Use of cone-beam computed tomography to identify root canal systems in vitro. J Endod 34:87–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Peters OA, Laib A, Rüegsegger P, Barbakow F (2000) Three-dimensional analysis of root canal geometry by high-resolution computed tomography. J Dent Res 79:1405–1409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Saber SEDM, Ahmed MHM, Obeid M, Ahmed HMA (2018) Root and canal morphology of maxillary premolar teeth in an Egyptian subpopulation using two classification systems: a cone beam computed tomography study. Int Endod J.  https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13016 Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Scarfe WC, Levin MD, Gane D, Farman AG (2009) Use of cone beam computed tomography in endodontics. Int J Dent.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/634567 Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tian YY, Guo B, Zhang R, Yu X, Wang H, Hu T, Dummer PM (2012) Root and canal morphology of maxillary first premolars in a Chinese subpopulation evaluated using cone-beam computed tomography. Int Endod J 45:996–1003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vertucci FJ (1984) Root canal anatomy of the human permanent teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 58:589–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vier-Pelisser FV, Dummer PM, Bryant S, Marca C, Só MV, Figueiredo JA (2010) The anatomy of the root canal system of three-rooted maxillary premolars analysed using high-resolution computed tomography. Int Endod J 43:1122–1131.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01787.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Radiology, Medical SchoolUniversity of BresciaBresciaItaly
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyFondazione Poliambulanza Istituto OspedalieroBresciaItaly
  3. 3.Dental School, Dental ClinicUniversity of BresciaBresciaItaly

Personalised recommendations