Advertisement

Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty of Infrapopliteal Lesions in Patients with Critical Limb Ischaemia: 1-Year Results of the APOLLO Trial

  • Ulf TeichgräberEmail author
  • Thomas Lehmann
  • Marcus Thieme
  • Kersten-Uwe Wahl
  • Christian Stelzner
  • Albrecht Bormann
  • Linda Götz
  • Tobias Kroeßner
  • Harald Boden
  • Lars Maiwald
  • René Aschenbach
Clinical Investigation Arterial Interventions
  • 23 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Arterial Interventions

Abstract

Purpose

This study intended to assess effectiveness and safety of the drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty of infrapopliteal atherosclerotic lesions in patients with critical limb ischaemia (CLI) in a real-world setting.

Methods

Consecutive patients with critical limb ischaemia who underwent infrapopliteal drug-coated balloon angioplasty with the ELUTAX SV DCB were enrolled into the prospective, multicentre, single-arm observational registry. Primary outcome was clinical improvement at 6 and 12 months. Secondary outcomes were change in quality of life, primary patency, freedom from repeat revascularisation, and amputation-free survival at 6 and 12 months.

Results

A total of 164 patients (74.7 ± 9.2 years) with CLI were included at nine German sites between November 2015 and September 2017. The majority (79.9%) of patients had diabetes mellitus, 57.3% had renal insufficiency, and 35.3% had coronary artery disease. Mean lesion length was 71.2 ± 76.5 mm. The Rutherford category improved by 3.0 ± 2.0 (p < 0.0001) within 12 months, resulting in a clinical improvement by at least one Rutherford category in 80.2% of the patients. Walking impairment questionnaire score, European Quality of Life index, and patient-reported pain improved significantly from baseline to 6 and 12 months. Primary patency was 68.5%, freedom from target lesion revascularisation 90.6%, and amputation-free survival 83.5% at 12 months.

Conclusion

Infrapopliteal drug-coated balloon angioplasty with the ELUTAX SV DCB in patients with critical limb ischaemia was efficacious and safe over the medium term. The study is registered with Clinical.Trials.gov (Identifier: NCT02539940).

Keywords

Below the knee Critical limb ischaemia Drug-coated balloon angioplasty Drug-eluting balloon Infrapopliteal Paclitaxel Peripheral artery disease 

Notes

Funding

This study was funded by Aachen Resonance.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

All other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest, except of Prof. Teichgräber who received a funding for the APOLLO study by Aachen Resonance.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Jaff MR, White CJ, Hiatt WR, et al. An update on methods for revascularization and expansion of the TASC lesion classification to include below-the-knee arteries: a supplement to the inter-society consensus for the management of peripheral arterial disease (TASC II): the TASC steering comittee(.). Ann Vasc Dis. 2015;8(4):343–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Norgren L, Hiatt WR, Dormandy JA, Nehler MR, Harris KA, Fowkes FG. Inter-society consensus for the management of peripheral arterial disease (TASC II). J Vasc Surg. 2007;45(Suppl S):S5–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Klaphake S, de Leur K, Mulder PG, et al. Mortality after major amputation in elderly patients with critical limb ischemia. Clin Interv Aging. 2017;12:1985–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aboyans V, Ricco JB, Bartelink MEL, et al. 2017 ESC Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Diseases, in collaboration with the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS): document covering atherosclerotic disease of extracranial carotid and vertebral, mesenteric, renal, upper and lower extremity arteriesEndorsed by: the European Stroke Organization (ESO)The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur Heart J. 2018;39(9):763–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baumann F, Fust J, Engelberger RP, et al. Early recoil after balloon angioplasty of tibial artery obstructions in patients with critical limb ischemia. J Endovasc Ther. 2014;21(1):44–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mustapha JA, Finton SM, Diaz-Sandoval LJ, Saab FA, Miller LE. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in patients with infrapopliteal arterial disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9(5):e003468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wu R, Tang S, Wang M, Li Z, Yao C, Wang S. Drug-eluting balloon versus standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in infrapopliteal arterial disease: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Int J Surg. 2016;35:88–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Katsanos K, Kitrou P, Spiliopoulos S, Diamantopoulos A, Karnabatidis D. Comparative effectiveness of plain balloon angioplasty, bare metal stents, drug-coated balloons, and drug-eluting stents for the treatment of infrapopliteal artery disease: systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Endovasc Ther. 2016;23(6):851–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhang J, Xu X, Kong J, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of drug-eluting balloon and stent for infrapopliteal artery revascularization. Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017;51(2):72–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Regensteiner JG, Steiner JF, Panzer RJ, Hiatt WR. Evaluation of walking impairment by questionnaire in patients with peripheral artery disease. J Vasc Med Biol. 1990;2:142–52.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    EuroQol. A new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990;16(3):199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brooks R. EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy. 1996;37(1):53–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stavroulakis K, Borowski M, Torsello G, Bisdas T. Association between statin therapy and amputation-free survival in patients with critical limb ischemia in the CRITISCH registry. J Vasc Surg. 2017;66(5):1534–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Baubeta Fridh E, Andersson M, Thuresson M, et al. Editor’s choice—impact of comorbidity, medication, and gender on amputation rate following revascularisation for chronic limb threatening ischaemia. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018;56(5):681–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liistro F, Porto I, Angioli P, et al. Drug-eluting balloon in peripheral intervention for below the knee angioplasty evaluation (DEBATE-BTK): a randomized trial in diabetic patients with critical limb ischemia. Circulation. 2013;128(6):615–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zeller T, Baumgartner I, Scheinert D, et al. Drug-eluting balloon versus standard balloon angioplasty for infrapopliteal arterial revascularization in critical limb ischemia: 12-month results from the INPACT DEEP randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(15):1568–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zeller T, Beschorner U, Pilger E, et al. Paclitaxel-coated balloon in infrapopliteal arteries: 12-month results from the BIOLUX P-II randomized trial (BIOTRONIK’S-First in Man study of the Passeo-18 LUX drug releasing PTA Balloon Catheter vs the uncoated Passeo-18 PTA balloon catheter in subjects requiring revascularization of infrapopliteal arteries). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8(12):1614–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cassese S, Ndrepepa G, Liistro F, et al. Drug-coated balloons for revascularization of infrapopliteal arteries: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9(10):1072–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Baubeta Fridh E, Andersson M, Thuresson M, et al. Amputation rates, mortality, and pre-operative comorbidities in patients revascularised for intermittent claudication or critical limb ischaemia: a population based study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017;54(4):480–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shammas AN, Jeon-Slaughter H, Tsai S, et al. Major limb outcomes following lower extremity endovascular revascularization in patients with and without diabetes mellitus. J Endovasc Ther. 2017;24(3):376–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Moussa Pacha H, Al-Khadra Y, Darmoch F, et al. Association between underweight body mass index and in-hospital outcome in patients undergoing endovascular interventions for peripheral artery disease: a propensity score matching analysis. J Endovasc Ther. 2019.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1526602819839046.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shishehbor MH, Secemsky EA, Varcoe RL. Is there a real association between paclitaxel devices and mortality? Time to pause and re-evaluate what we know about this statistical finding. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8(10):e012524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ulf Teichgräber
    • 1
    Email author
  • Thomas Lehmann
    • 2
  • Marcus Thieme
    • 3
  • Kersten-Uwe Wahl
    • 4
  • Christian Stelzner
    • 5
  • Albrecht Bormann
    • 6
  • Linda Götz
    • 7
  • Tobias Kroeßner
    • 8
  • Harald Boden
    • 9
  • Lars Maiwald
    • 10
  • René Aschenbach
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyJena University HospitalJenaGermany
  2. 2.Center for Clinical StudiesJena University HospitalJenaGermany
  3. 3.REGIOMED Klinikum SonnebergSonnebergGermany
  4. 4.Oberlausitz KlinikenBautzenGermany
  5. 5.Städtisches Krankenhaus Dresden-FriedrichstadtDresdenGermany
  6. 6.Klinikum Altenburger LandAltenburgGermany
  7. 7.Saale-Unstrut Klinikum NaumburgNaumburgGermany
  8. 8.SRH-Waldklinikum GeraGeraGermany
  9. 9.Ilm-Kreis-Kliniken Arnstadt-IlmenauIlmenauGermany
  10. 10.Kreiskrankenhaus TorgauTorgauGermany

Personalised recommendations