Efficacy of Automated Supplying Artery Tracking Software Using Multidetector-Row Computed Tomography Images for Emergent Transcatheter Arterial Embolization
- 78 Downloads
To assess the reliability of a prototype automated supplying artery tracking software (ASATS) using multidetector-row CT (MDCT) images in emergent TAE.
Materials and Methods
Consecutive 53 patients underwent 57 sessions of emergent TAE during 7 months. Twenty-one cases were excluded due to a lack of CT data (n = 12) or negative angiographic findings (n = 9). Remaining 34 sessions of TAE and MDCT images in 32 patients (mean age 62.9 years; age range 37–92 years) were enrolled. ASATS was retrospectively conducted for the identification of supplying arteries which were confirmed with angiography (automated method). Manual modification was added as needed (semi-automated method). Two observers independently reviewed the MDCT images to detect supplying arteries (manual method). Detectability of supplying artery and time to analysis were compared among the automated, semi-automated, and manual methods by both observers.
A total of 64 bleeding sites were demonstrated on angiography. The detectability was 28 (43.8%) for automated method, 53 (82.8%) for semi-automated method, 55 (85.9%) for observer 1, and 58 (90.6%) for observer 2. Detectability of semi-automated method was significantly better than of automated method (P = 0.000) and comparable with manual method by both observers (P = 0.193 and 0.081). Average time to analysis was 185.4 s for automated method, 297.2 s for semi-automated method, 186.2 s for observer 1, and 243.7 s for observer 2.
ASATS has a sufficient ability to identify supplying arteries of bleeding by adding manual modification as needed and can be used for emergent TAE.
Level of Evidence
Level 4, Case Control Study.
KeywordsTranscatheter arterial embolization Multidetector-row computed tomography Automated vessel tracking Navigation
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest. The added co-author, Dr. Hiroshi Kawada, has no conflicts of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional review board and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This retrospective study design was also approved by our institutional review board, and written informed was not required.
- 1.Soyer P, Dohan A, Dautry R, Guerrache Y, Ricbourg A, Gayat E, et al. Transcatheter arterial embolization for postpartum hemorrhage: indications, technique, results, and complications. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2015;38(5):1068–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-015-1054-y.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 2.van der Vlies CH, Hoekstra J, Ponsen KJ, Reekers JA, van Delden OM, Goslings JC. Impact of splenic artery embolization on the success rate of nonoperative management for blunt splenic injury. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2012;35(1):76–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-011-0132-z.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 4.Froberg L, Helgstrand F, Clausen C, Steinmetz J, Eckardt H. Mortality in trauma patients with active arterial bleeding managed by embolization or surgical packing: an observational cohort study of 66 patients. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2016;9(3):107–14. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-2700.185274.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 5.Cullinane DC, Schiller HJ, Zielinski MD, Bilaniuk JW, Collier BR, Como J, et al. Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma practice management guidelines for hemorrhage in pelvic fracture-update and systematic review. J Trauma. 2011;71(6):1850–68. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31823dca9a.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Miyayama S, Yamashiro M, Nagai K, Tohyama J, Kawamura K, Yoshida M, et al. Efficacy of automated tumor-feeder detection software using cone-beam computed tomography technology in transarterial embolization through extrahepatic collateral vessels for malignant hepatic tumors. Hepatol Res off J Jpn Soc Hepatol. 2016;46(2):166–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/hepr.12556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar