Advertisement

Renal Artery Embolization Combined With Radiofrequency Ablation in a Porcine Kidney Model: Effect of Small and Narrowly Calibrated Microparticles as Embolization Material on Coagulation Diameter, Volume, and Shape

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of renal artery embolization with small and narrowly calibrated microparticles on the coagulation diameter, volume, and shape of radiofrequency ablations (RFAs) in porcine kidneys. Forty-eight RFAs were performed in 24 kidneys of 12 pigs. In 6 animals, bilateral renal artery embolization was performed with small and narrowly calibrated microparticles. Upper and lower kidney poles were ablated with identical system parameters. Applying three-dimensional segmentation software, RFAs were segmented on registered 2 mm-thin macroscopic slices. Length, depth, width, volume_segmented, and volume_calculated were determined to describe the size of the RFAs. To evaluate the shape of the RFAs, depth-to-width ratio (perfect symmetry-to-lesion length was indicated by a ratio of 1), sphericity ratio (perfect sphere was indicated by a sphericity ratio of 1), eccentricity (perfect sphere was indicated by an eccentricity of 0), and circularity (perfect circle was indicated by a circularity of 1) were determined. Embolized compared with nonembolized RFAs showed significantly greater depth (23.4 ± 3.6 vs. 17.2 ± 1.8 mm; p < 0.001) and width (20.1 ± 2.9 vs. 12.6 ± 3.7 mm; p < 0.001); significantly larger volume_segmented (8.6 ± 3.2 vs. 3.0 ± 0.7 ml; p < 0.001) and volume_calculated (8.4 ± 3.0 ml vs. 3.3 ± 1.1 ml; p < 0.001); significantly lower depth-to-width (1.17 ± 0.10 vs. 1.48 ± 0.44; p < 0.05), sphericity (1.55 ± 0.44 vs. 1.96 ± 0.43; p < 0.01), and eccentricity (0.84 ± 0.61 vs. 1.73 ± 0.91; p < 0.01) ratios; and significantly greater circularity (0.62 ± 0.14 vs. 0.45 ± 0.16; p < 0.01). Renal artery embolization with small and narrowly calibrated microparticles affected the coagulation diameter, volume, and shape of RFAs in porcine kidneys. Embolized RFAs were significantly larger and more spherical compared with nonembolized RFAs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 99

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. 1.

    Rutherford EE, Cast JE, Breen DJ (2008) Immediate and long-term CT appearances following radiofrequency ablation of renal tumours. Clin Radiol 63:220–230

  2. 2.

    Mondshine RT, Owens S, Mondschein JI et al (2008) Combination embolization and radiofrequency ablation therapy for renal cell carcinoma in the setting of coexisting arterial disease. J Vasc Interv Radiol 19:616–620

  3. 3.

    Campbell J, Rosenthal DI, Raskin KA et al (2006) Use of an arterial tourniquet to achieve complete radiofrequency ablation of a renal metastasis. J Vasc Interv Radiol 17:1051–1055

  4. 4.

    Kyle CC, Wingo MS, Carey RI et al (2008) Diagnostic yield of renal biopsy immediately prior to laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation: a multicenter study. J Endourol 22:2291–2293

  5. 5.

    Breen DJ, Rutherford EE, Stedman B et al (2007) Management of renal tumors by image-guided radiofrequency ablation: experience in 105 tumors. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 30:936–942

  6. 6.

    Raman JD, Thomas J, Lucas SM et al (2008) Radiofrequency ablation for T1a tumors in a solitary kidney: promising intermediate oncologic and renal function outcomes. Can J Urol 15:3980–3985

  7. 7.

    Veltri A, Calvo A, Tosetti I et al (2006) Experiences in US-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of 44 renal tumors in 31 patients: analysis of predictors for complications and technical success. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 29:811–818

  8. 8.

    Stern JM, Svatek R, Park S et al (2007) Intermediate comparison of partial nephrectomy and radiofrequency ablation for clinical T1a renal tumours. BJU Int 100:287–290

  9. 9.

    Lohr M, Rohde D (2005) Recurrent disease in renal cell carcinoma. “Local recurrence” after kidney-sparing and radical resection. Urologe A 44:358–368

  10. 10.

    Tacke J (2007) Interventional oncology in urology. Radiologe 47:1089–1096

  11. 11.

    Yamakado K, Nakatsuka A, Kobayashi S et al (2006) Radiofrequency ablation combined with renal arterial embolization for the treatment of unresectable renal cell carcinoma larger than 3.5 cm: initial experience. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 29:389–394

  12. 12.

    Arima K, Yamakado K, Kinbara H et al (2007) Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation with transarterial embolization is useful for treatment of stage 1 renal cell carcinoma with surgical risk: Results at 2-year mean follow up. Int J Urol 14:585–590

  13. 13.

    Marcovich R, Aldana JP, Morgenstern N et al (2003) Optimal lesion assessment following acute radio frequency ablation of porcine kidney: cellular viability or histopathology? J Urol 170:1370–1374

  14. 14.

    Patterson EJ, Scudamore CH, Owen DA et al (1998) Radiofrequency ablation of porcine liver in vivo: effects of blood flow and treatment time on lesion size. Ann Surg 227:559–565

  15. 15.

    Chung H, Kudo M, Minami Y et al (2007) Radiofrequency ablation combined with reduction of hepatic blood flow: effect of lipiodol on coagulation diameter and ablation time in normal pig liver. Hepatogastroenterology 54:701–704

  16. 16.

    Chang I, Mikityansky I, Wray-Cahen D et al (2004) Effects of perfusion on radiofrequency ablation in swine kidneys. Radiology 231:500–505

  17. 17.

    Nakai M, Sato M, Sahara S et al (2007) Radiofrequency ablation in a porcine liver model: effects of transcatheter arterial embolization with iodized oil on ablation time, maximum output, and coagulation diameter as well as angiographic characteristics. World J Gastroenterol 13:2841–2845

  18. 18.

    Iwamoto T, Kawai N, Sato M et al (2008) Effectiveness of hepatic arterial embolization on radiofrequency ablation volume in a swine model: relationship to portal venous flow and liver parenchymal pressure. J Vasc Interv Radiol 19:1646–1651

  19. 19.

    Ritz JP, Lehmann KS, Isbert C et al (2006) In vivo evaluation of a novel bipolar radiofrequency device for interstitial thermotherapy of liver tumors during normal and interrupted hepatic perfusion. J Surg Res 133:176–184

  20. 20.

    Bonomo G, Pedicini V, Monfardini L et al (2010) Bland embolization in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma using precise, tightly size-calibrated, anti-inflammatory microparticles: first clinical experience and one-year follow-up. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 33:552–559

  21. 21.

    Bayne K (1998) Developing guidelines on the care and use of animals. Ann NY Acad Sci 862:105–110

  22. 22.

    Vogt FM, Antoch G, Veit P et al (2007) Morphologic and functional changes in nontumorous liver tissue after radiofrequency ablation in an in vivo model: comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT, MRI, ultrasound, and CT. J Nucl Med 48:1836–1844

  23. 23.

    Goldberg SN, Gazelle GS, Compton CC et al (2000) Treatment of intrahepatic malignancy with radiofrequency ablation: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Cancer 88:2452–2463

  24. 24.

    Crowley JD, Shelton J, Iverson AJ et al (2001) Laparoscopic and computed tomography-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of renal tissue: acute and chronic effects in an animal model. Urology 57:976–980

  25. 25.

    Burdio F, Navarro A, Sousa R et al (2006) Evolving technology in bipolar perfused radiofrequency ablation: assessment of efficacy, predictability and safety in a pig liver model. Eur Radiol 16:1826–1834

  26. 26.

    Nakada SY, Jerde TJ, Warner TF et al (2003) Bipolar radiofrequency ablation of the kidney: comparison with monopolar radiofrequency ablation. J Endourol 17:927–933

  27. 27.

    Laeseke PF, Lee FT Jr, Sampson LA et al (2009) Microwave ablation versus radiofrequency ablation in the kidney: high-power triaxial antennas create larger ablation zones than similarly sized internally cooled electrodes. J Vasc Interv Radiol 20:1224–1229

  28. 28.

    Hsu TH, Fidler ME, Gill IS (2007) Radiofrequency ablation of the kidney: acute and chronic histology in porcine model. Urology 56:872–875

  29. 29.

    Lee JM, Han JK, Kim SH et al (2007) In vivo efficiency of multipolar radiofrequency ablation with two bipolar electrodes: a comparative experimental study in pig kidney. J Vasc Interv Radiol 18:1553–1560

  30. 30.

    Pereira PL, Trubenbach J, Schenk M et al (2004) Radiofrequency ablation: in vivo comparison of four commercially available devices in pig livers. Radiology 232:482–490

  31. 31.

    Denys AL, De Baere T, Kuoch V et al (2003) Radio-frequency tissue ablation of the liver: in vivo and ex vivo experiments with four different systems. Eur Radiol 13:2346–2352

  32. 32.

    Goldberg SN, Gazelle GS (2001) Radiofrequency tissue ablation: physical principles and techniques for increasing coagulation necrosis. Hepatogastroenterology 48:359–367

  33. 33.

    Goldberg SN, Hahn PF, Tanabe KK et al (1998) Percutaneous radiofrequency tissue ablation: does perfusion-mediated tissue cooling limit coagulation necrosis? J Vasc Interv Radiol 9:101–111

  34. 34.

    Goldberg SN, Hahn PF, Halpern EF et al (1998) Radio-frequency tissue ablation: effect of pharmacologic modulation of blood flow on coagulation diameter. Radiology 209:761–767

  35. 35.

    Yamasaki T, Kurokawa F, Shirahashi H et al (2002) Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation therapy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma during occlusion of hepatic blood flow. Comparison with standard percutaneous radiofrequency ablation therapy. Cancer 95:2353–2360

  36. 36.

    Stampfl S, Bellemann N, Stampfl U et al (2009) Arterial distribution characteristics of embozene particles and comparison with other spherical embolic agents in the porcine acute embolization model. J Vasc Interv Radiol 20:1597–1607

  37. 37.

    Stampfl S, Stampfl U, Bellemann N et al (2009) Immunohistochemical characterization of specific inflammatory tissue reactions following embolization with four different spherical agents in the minipig kidney model. J Vasc Interv Radiol 20:936–945

  38. 38.

    Stampfl S, Bellemann N, Stampfl U et al (2008) Inflammation and recanalization of four different spherical embolization agents in the porcine kidney model. J Vasc Interv Radiol 19:577–586

  39. 39.

    Stampfl U, Stampfl S, Bellemann N et al (2009) Experimental liver embolization with four different spherical embolic materials: impact on inflammatory tissue and foreign body reaction. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 32:303–312

  40. 40.

    Kauffmann GW, Richter GM, Roeren T (1991) Current status of embolization materials. Rontgenpraxis 44:146–149

  41. 41.

    Yu SC, Hui JW, Hui EP et al (2009) Embolization efficacy and treatment effectiveness of transarterial therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a case-controlled comparison of transarterial ethanol ablation with lipiodol-ethanol mixture versus transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol 20:352–359

  42. 42.

    Hirakawa M, Ikeda K, Kawamura Y et al (2008) New ablation procedure for a radiofrequency liver tissue coagulation system using an expandable needle. Liver Int 28:214–219

  43. 43.

    Hacker A, Vallo S, Weiss C et al (2005) Minimally invasive treatment of renal cell carcinoma: comparison of 4 different monopolar radiofrequency devices. Eur Urol 48:584–592

  44. 44.

    Burdio F, Berjano EJ, Navarro A et al (2009) Research and development of a new RF-assisted device for bloodless rapid transection of the liver: computational modeling and in vivo experiments. Biomed Eng Online 8:6

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to C. M. Sommer.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Movie 1. Three-dimensional segmentation of an embolized RFA (red) in the upper kidney pole (brown). (MPG 3778 kb)

Movie 2. Three-dimensional segmentation of a nonembolized RFA (red) in the upper kidney pole (brown). (MPG 4661 kb)

Movie 1. Three-dimensional segmentation of an embolized RFA (red) in the upper kidney pole (brown). (MPG 3778 kb)

Movie 2. Three-dimensional segmentation of a nonembolized RFA (red) in the upper kidney pole (brown). (MPG 4661 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sommer, C.M., Kortes, N., Zelzer, S. et al. Renal Artery Embolization Combined With Radiofrequency Ablation in a Porcine Kidney Model: Effect of Small and Narrowly Calibrated Microparticles as Embolization Material on Coagulation Diameter, Volume, and Shape. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 34, 156–165 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-010-9908-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Radiofrequency ablation
  • Transarterial embolization
  • Particles
  • Embozene
  • 3d Segmentation
  • Porcine kidney