Advertisement

Simultaneous measurements of electrical conductivity and seismic wave velocity of partially molten geological materials: effect of evolving melt texture

  • D. Freitas
  • G. Manthilake
  • J. Chantel
  • M. A. Bouhifd
  • D. Andrault
Original Paper
  • 32 Downloads

Abstract

Comparison between geophysical observations and laboratory measurements yields contradicting estimations of the melt fraction for the partially molten regions of the Earth, highlighting potential disagreements between laboratory-based electrical conductivity and seismic wave velocity measurement techniques. In this study, we performed simultaneous acoustic wave velocity and electrical conductivity measurements on a simplified partial melt analogue (olivine + mid oceanic ridge basalt, MORB) at 2.5 GPa and up to 1650 K. We aim to investigate the effect of ongoing textural modification of partially molten peridotite analog on both electrical conductivity and sound wave velocity. Acoustic wave velocity (Vp and Vs) and EC are measured on an identical sample presenting the same melt texture, temperature gradient, stress field and chemical impurities. We observe a sharp decrease of acoustic wave velocities and increase of electrical conductivity in response to melting of MORB component. At constant temperature of 1650 K, electrical conductivity gradually increases, whereas acoustic velocities remain relatively constant. While the total MORB components melt instantaneously above the melting temperature, the melt interconnectivity and the melt distribution should evolve with time, affecting the electrical conduction. Consequently, our experimental observations suggest that acoustic velocities respond spontaneously to the melt volume fraction for melt with high wetting properties, whereas electrical conduction is significantly affected by subsequent melt texture modifications. We find that acoustic velocity measurements are thus better suited to the determination of the melt fraction of a partially molten sample at the laboratory time scale (~ h). Based on our estimations, the reduced Vs velocity in the major part of the low velocity zone away from spreading ridges can be explained by 0.3–0.8 vol% volatile-bearing melt and the high Vp/Vs ratio obtained for these melt fractions (1.82–1.87) are compatible with geophysical observations.

Keywords

Electrical conductivity Acoustic wave velocity Low velocity zone Dihedral angle Melt fraction MORB 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank J.-M. Henot for the SEM analyses, J.-L. Devidal for the electron microprobe analyses and A. Mathieu for the technical assistance. We thank F. Gaillard for beneficial discussions. DF acknowledges S. Thivet for FOAMS assistance and starting powder analysis. GM acknowledges funding from the French PNP program (INSU-CNRS) and Actions initiatives OPGC 2014. DA is supported by ANR-13-BS06-0008. This research was financed by the French Government Laboratory of Excellence initiative no ANR-10-LABX-0006, the Région Auvergne and the European Regional Development Fund. This is Laboratory of Excellence ClerVolc contribution number 326. All of the experimental data and numerical modelling are provided in the figures and tables obtained by methods described in the text.

Supplementary material

269_2019_1021_MOESM1_ESM.docx (617 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 618 KB)

References

  1. Anderson D, Sammis C (1970) Partial melting in the upper mantle. Phys Earth Planet Inter 3:41–50Google Scholar
  2. Andrault D, Pesce G, Bouhifd MA, Bolfan-Casanova N, Hénot J-M, Mezouar M (2014) Melting of subducted basalt at the core-mantle boundary. Science 344(6186):892–895.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1250466 Google Scholar
  3. Bouhifd MA, Andrault D, Fiquet G, Richet P (1996) Thermal expansion of forsterite up to the melting point. Geophys Res Lett 23:1143–1146Google Scholar
  4. Bussod GY, Christie JM (1991) Textural development and melt topology in spinel lherzolite experimentally deformed at hypersolidus conditions. J Petrol 2:17–39Google Scholar
  5. Caricchi L, Gaillard F, Mecklenburgh J, Le Trong E (2011) Experimental determination of electrical conductivity during deformation of melt-bearing olivine aggregates: implications for electrical anisotropy in the oceanic low velocity zone. Earth Planet Sci Lett 302(1–2):81–94.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2010.11.041 Google Scholar
  6. Cartigny P, Pineau F, Aubaud C, Javoy M (2008) Towards a consistent mantle carbon flux estimate: insights from volatile systematics (H2O/Ce, δD, CO2/Nb) in the North Atlantic mantle (14°N and 34°N). Earth Planet Sci Lett 265(3–4):672–685.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2007.11.011 Google Scholar
  7. Chantel J, Manthilake G, Andrault D, Novella D, Yu T, Wang Y (2016) Experimental evidence supports mantle partial melting in the asthenosphere. Sci Adv 2(5):e1600246.  https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1600246 Google Scholar
  8. Cmíral M, Fitz Gerald JD, Faul UH, Green DH (1998) A close look at dihedral angles and melt geometry in olivine-basalt aggregates: a TEM study. Contrib Mineral Petrol 130(3–4):336–345.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s004100050369 Google Scholar
  9. Constable S (2006) SEO3: a new model of olivine electrical conductivity. Geophys J Int 166(1):435–437.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03041.x Google Scholar
  10. Cooper RF, Kohlstedt DL (1984) Sintering of olivine and olivine basalt aggregates. Phys Chem Miner 11:5–16.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309372 Google Scholar
  11. Dasgupta R, Hirschmann MM (2006) Melting in the Earth’s deep upper mantle caused by carbon dioxide. Nature 440(7084):659–662Google Scholar
  12. Dasgupta R, Hirschmann MM (2007) Effect of variable carbonate concentration on the solidus of mantle peridotite. Am Mineral 92:370–379.  https://doi.org/10.2138/Am.2007.2201 doiGoogle Scholar
  13. Davies GF, O'Connell RJ (1977) Transducer and bond phase shifts in ultrasonics and their effects on measured pressure derivatives of elastic moduli. In: Manghnani M, Akimoto S (eds) High pressure research: application in geophysics. Academic Press, New York, pp 533–562Google Scholar
  14. Dziewonski AM, Anderson DL (1981) Preliminary reference Earth model. Phys Earth Planet Inter 25:297–356.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9201(81)90046-7 Google Scholar
  15. Faul UH, Toomey DR, Waff HS (1994) Intergranular basaltic melt is distributed in thin, elongated inclusions. Geophys Res Lett 21(1):29–32Google Scholar
  16. Faul UH, Fitz Gerald JD, Jackson I (2004) Shear wave attenuation and dispersion in melt-bearing olivine polycrystals: 2. Microstructural interpretation and seismological implications. J Geophys Res B Solid Earth 109:1–20.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JB002407 Google Scholar
  17. Fischer KM, Ford HA, Abt DL, Rychert CA (2010) The lithosphere–asthenosphere boundary. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 38(1):551–575.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-040809-152438 Google Scholar
  18. Freitas D, Manthilake G, Schiavi F, Chantel J, Bolfan-Casanova N, Bouhifd MA, Andrault D (2017) Experimental evidence supporting a global melt layer at the base of the Earth’s upper mantle. Nat Commun 8:2186.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02275-9 Google Scholar
  19. Gaillard F, Marziano GI (2005) Electrical conductivity of magma in the course of crystallization controlled by their residual liquid composition. J Geophys Res Solid Earth.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JB003282 Google Scholar
  20. Gaillard F, Malki M, Iacono-Marziano G, Pichavant M, Scaillet B (2008) Carbonatite melts and electrical conductivity in the asthenosphere. Science 322(5906):1363–1365.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1164446 Google Scholar
  21. Galer SJG, O’Nions RK (1986) Magmagenesis and the mapping of chemical and isotopic variations in the mantle. Chem Geol 56(1):45–61.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2541(86)90109-9 Google Scholar
  22. Gillet P, Richet P, Guyot F, Fiquet G (1991) High-temperature thermodynamic properties of forsterite. J Geophys Res B96:11805–11816Google Scholar
  23. Goetze C (1977) A brief summary of our present day understanding of the effect of volatiles and partial melt on the mechanical properties of the upper mantle. In: Manghnani MH, Akimoto S-I (eds) High-pressure research, applications in geophysics. Academic Press, New York, pp 3–23Google Scholar
  24. Hammond WC, Humphreys ED (2000) Upper mantle seismic wave attenuation: effects of realistic partial melt distribution. J Geophys Res 105(B5):10987–10999.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2000jb900042 Google Scholar
  25. Hansen RTJ, Bostock MG, Christensen NI (2012) Nature of the low velocity zone in Cascadia from receiver function waveform inversion. Earth Planet Sci Lett 337–338:25–38.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2012.05.031 Google Scholar
  26. Hier-Majumder S (2008) Influence of contiguity on seismic velocities of partially molten aggregates. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 113(12):1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JB005662 Google Scholar
  27. Hirano N, Takahashi E, Yamamoto J, Abe N, Ingle S, Kaneoka I, Hirata T, Kimura J-I, Ishii T, Ogawa Y, Machida S, Suyehiro K (2006) Volcanism in response to plate flexure. Science 313(5792):1426–1428.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1128235 Google Scholar
  28. Jackson I, Niesler H, Weidner DJ (1981) Explicit correction of ultrasonically determined elastic wave velocities for transducer-bond phase shift. J Geophys Res 86:3736–3748Google Scholar
  29. Jackson I, Gerald JDF, Faul UH, Tan BH (2002) Grain-size-sensitive seismic wave attenuation in polycrystalline olivine. J Geophys Res 107:1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JB001225 Google Scholar
  30. Jackson I, Faul UH, Fitz Gerald JD, Tan BH (2004) Shear wave attenuation and dispersion in melt-bearing olivine polycrystals: 1. Specimen fabrication and mechanical testing. J Geophys Res B Solid Earth 109:1–20.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JB002407 Google Scholar
  31. Karato S (1990) The role of hydrogen in the electrical conductivity of the upper mantle. Nature 347:183–187.  https://doi.org/10.1038/346183a0 Google Scholar
  32. Karato S (1993) Importance of anelasticity in the interpretation of seismic tomography. Geophys Res Lett 20:1623–1626Google Scholar
  33. Karato S (2014) Does partial melting explain geophysical anomalies? Phys Earth Planet Inter 228:300–306.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2013.08.006 Google Scholar
  34. Kawakatsu H, Kumar P, Takei Y, Shinohara M, Kanazawa T, Araki E, Suyehiro K (2009) Seismic evidence for sharp boundaries of oceanic plates. Science 324(5926):499–502Google Scholar
  35. Kennett BLN, Engdahl ER, Buland R (1995) Constraints on seismic velocities in the Earth from traveltimes. Geophys J Int 122:108–124.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1995.tb03540.x Google Scholar
  36. Kohlstedt DL (1992) Structure, rheology and permeability of partially molten rocks at low melt fractions. In: Phipps-Morgan J, Blackman DK, Sinton JM (eds) Mantle flow and melt generation at mid-ocean ridges. American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, pp 103–121Google Scholar
  37. Kono Y, Park C, Sakamaki T, Kenny-Benson C, Shen G, Wang Y (2012) Simultaneous structure and elastic wave velocity measurement of SiO2 glass at high pressures and high temperatures in a Paris–Edinburgh cell. Rev Sci Instrum 83(3):33905.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3698000 Google Scholar
  38. Laporte D, Provost A (2000) The grain-scale distribution of silicate, carbonate and metallosulfide partial melts: a review of theory and experiments. In: Bagdassarov N, Laporte D, Thompson AB (eds) Physics and chemistry of partially molten rocks. Kluwer Academic, Norwell, pp 93–140Google Scholar
  39. Laporte D, Rapaille C, Provost A (1997) Wetting angles, equilibrium melt geometry, and the permeability threshold of partially molten crustal protoliths BT. In: Bouchez JL, Hutton DHW, Stephens WE (eds) Granite: from segregation of melt to emplacement fabrics. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 31–54Google Scholar
  40. Laske G, Markee A, Orcutt JA, Wolfe CJ, Collins JA, Solomon SC, Detrick RS, Bercovici D, Hauri EH (2011) Asymmetric shallow mantle structure beneath the Hawaiian Swell-evidence from Rayleigh waves recorded by the PLUME network. Geophys J Int 187(3):1725–1742.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2011.05238.x Google Scholar
  41. Laumonier M, Farla R, Frost DJ, Katsura T, Marquardt K, Bouvier A-S, Baumgartner LP (2017) Experimental determination of melt interconnectivity and electrical conductivity in the upper mantle. Earth Planet Sci Lett 463(Supplement C):286–297.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2017.01.037 Google Scholar
  42. Li B, Liebermann RC (2007) Indoor seismology by probing the Earth’s interior by using sound velocity measurements at high pressures and temperatures. PNAS 104:9145–9150Google Scholar
  43. Li L, Wentzcovitch M, Weider DJ, Da Silva CRS (2007) Vibrational and thermodynamic properties of forsterite at mantle conditions. J Geophys Res.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JB004546 Google Scholar
  44. Manthilake MAGM, Matsuzaki T, Yoshino T, Yamashita S, Ito E, Katsura T (2009) Electrical conductivity of wadsleyite as a function of temperature and water content. Phys Earth Planet Inter 174(1–4):10–18.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2008.06.001 Google Scholar
  45. Maumus J, Bagdassarov N, Schmeling H (2005) Electrical conductivity and partial melting of mafic rocks under pressure. Geochemica Cosmochimica Acta 69:4703–4178.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2005.05.010 Google Scholar
  46. Mavko G (1980) Velocity and attenuation in partially molten rocks. J Geophys Res 85:5173–5189Google Scholar
  47. Minarik WG, Watson EB (1995) Interconnectivity of carbonate melt at low melt fraction. Earth Planet Sci Lett 133(3–4):423–437.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(95)00085-Q Google Scholar
  48. Naumov VB, Dorofeeva VA, Girnis AV, Yarmolyuk VV (2014) Comparison of major, volatile, and trace element contents in the melts of mid-ocean ridges on the basis of data on inclusions in minerals and quenched glasses of rocks. Geochem Int 52(5):347–364.  https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016702914050073 Google Scholar
  49. Ni H, Keppler H, Behrens H (2011) Electrical conductivity of hydrous basaltic melts: implications for partial melting in the upper mantle. Contrib Mineral Petrol 162(3):637–650.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00410-011-0617-4 Google Scholar
  50. Nielser H, Jackson I (1989) Pressure derivatives of elastic wave velocities from ultrasonic interferometric measurements on jacketed polycrystals. J Acoust Soc Am 86:1573–1585Google Scholar
  51. Novella D, Frost DJ, Hauri EH, Bureau H, Raepsaet C, Roberge M (2014) The distribution of H2O between silicate melt and nominally anhydrous peridotite and the onset of hydrous melting in the deep upper mantle. Earth Planet Sci Lett 400:1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2014.05.006 Google Scholar
  52. O’Connell RJ, Budiansky B (1974) Seismic velocities in dry and saturated cracked solids. J Geophys Res 79(35):5412–5426.  https://doi.org/10.1029/JB079i035p05412 Google Scholar
  53. Okumura S, Hirano N (2013) Carbon dioxide emission to earth’s surface by deep-sea volcanism. Geology 41(11):1167–1170.  https://doi.org/10.1130/G34620.1 Google Scholar
  54. Pfeiffer T (1998) Viscosities and electrical conductivities of oxidic glass-forming melts. Solid State Ion 105(1):277–287.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2738(97)00475-X Google Scholar
  55. Plank T, Langmuir CH (1992) Effects of the melting regime on the composition of the oceanic crust. J Geophys Res 97(B13):19749–19770.  https://doi.org/10.1029/92jb01769 Google Scholar
  56. Pommier A, Garnero EJ (2014) Petrology-based modeling of mantle melt electrical conductivity and joint interpretation of electromagnetic and seismic results. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 119:4001–4016.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JB011567 Google Scholar
  57. Pommier A, Leinenweber K, Kohlstedt DL, Qi C, Garnero EJ, Mackwell SJ, Tyburczy JA (2015) Experimental constraints on the electrical anisotropy of the lithosphere-asthenosphere system. Nature 522(7555):202–206Google Scholar
  58. Presnall DC, Simmons CL, Porath H (1972) Changes in electrical conductivity of a synthetic basalt during melting. J Geophys Res 77(29):5665.  https://doi.org/10.1029/JB077i029p05665 Google Scholar
  59. Rivers ML, Carmichael ISE (1987) Ultrasonic studies of silicate melts. J Geophys Res 92:9247–9270Google Scholar
  60. Roberts JJ, Tyburczy Ja (1999) Partial-melt electrical conductivity: influence of melt composition. J Geophys Res 104(B4):7055.  https://doi.org/10.1029/1998JB900111 Google Scholar
  61. Romanowicz B (1995) A global tomographic model of shear attenuation in the upper mantle. J Geophys Res 100(B7):12375.  https://doi.org/10.1029/95JB00957 Google Scholar
  62. Saal AE, Hauri EH, Langmuir CH, Perfit MR (2002) Vapour undersaturation in primitive mid-ocean-ridge basalt and the volatile content of Earth’s upper mantle. Nature 419(6906):451–455.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01073 Google Scholar
  63. Sahagian DL, Proussevitch AA (1998) 3D particle size distributions from 2D observations: stereology for natural applications. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 84(3):173–196.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-0273(98)00043-2 Google Scholar
  64. Salters VJM, Hart SR (1989) The hafnium paradox and the role of garnet in the source of mid-ocean-ridge basalts. Nature 342:420Google Scholar
  65. Sato H, Sacks IS, Murase T, Muncill G, Fukuyama H (1989) Qp-melting temperature relation in peridotite at high pressure and temperature: attenuation mechanism and implications for the mechanical properties of the upper mantle. J Geophys Res 94(B8):10647.  https://doi.org/10.1029/JB094iB08p10647 Google Scholar
  66. Schaeffer AJ, Bostock MG (2010) A low-velocity zone atop the transition zone in northwestern Canada. J Geophys Res 115:B06302.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JB006856 Google Scholar
  67. Schmeling H (1986) Numerical models on the influence of partial melt on elastic, anelastic and electrical properties of rocks. Part II: electrical conductivity. Phys Earth Planet Inter 43(2):123–136.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9201(86)90080-4 Google Scholar
  68. Schmerr N (2012) The Gutenberg discontinuity: melt at the lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary. Science 335(6075):1480–1483.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1215433 Google Scholar
  69. Shankland TJ, Waff HS (1977) Partial melting and electrical conductivity anomalies in the upper mantle. J Geophys Res 82(33):5409–5417Google Scholar
  70. Shea T, Houghton BF, Gurioli L, Cashman KV, Hammer JE, Hobden BJ (2010) Textural studies of vesicles in volcanic rocks: an integrated methodology. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 190(3–4):271–289.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2009.12.003 Google Scholar
  71. Sifré D, Gardés E, Massuyeau M, Hashim L, Hier-Majumder S, Gaillard F (2014) Electrical conductivity during incipient melting in the oceanic low-velocity zone. Nature 509(7498):81–85.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13245 Google Scholar
  72. Soustelle V, Manthilake G (2017) Deformation of olivine-orthopyroxene aggregates at high pressure and temperature: implications for the seismic properties of the asthenosphere. Tectonophysics 694:385–399.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2016.11.020 Google Scholar
  73. Stixrude L, Lithgow-Bertelloni C (2005) Mineralogy and elasticity of the oceanic upper mantle: origin of the low-velocity zone. J Geophys Res B Solid Earth 110(3):1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JB002965 Google Scholar
  74. Takei Y (1998) Constitutive mechanical relations of solid–liquid composites in terms of grain-boundary contiguity. J Geophys Res 103(B8):18183–18203Google Scholar
  75. Takei Y (2000) Acoustic properties of partially molten media studied on a simple binary system with a controllable dihedral angle. J Geophys Res 105(B7):16665.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JB900124 Google Scholar
  76. Takei Y (2002) Effect of pore geometry on V P/V S: from equilibrium geometry to crack. J Geophys Res 107(B2):2043.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JB000522 Google Scholar
  77. ten Grotenhuis SM, Drury MR, Spiers CJ, Peach CJ (2005) Melt distribution in olivine rocks based on electrical conductivity measurements. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 110(12):1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JB003462 Google Scholar
  78. Toomey DR, Wilcock WSD, Solomon SC, Hammond WC, Orcutt JA (1998) Mantle seismic structure beneath the MELT region of the East Pacific Rise from P and S wave tomography mantle seismic structure beneath the MELT region of the East Pacific Rise from P and S wave tomography the primary ocean bottom seismometer. Science (80-) 280:1224–1227.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.280.5367.1224 Google Scholar
  79. Toomey DR, Jousselin D, Dunn R, Wilcock WSD, Detrick RS (2007) Skew of mantle upwelling beneath the East Pacific Rise governs segmentation. Nature 446(7134):409–414.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05679 Google Scholar
  80. Tyburczy JA, Waff HS (1983) Electrical conductivity of molten basalt and andesite to 25 kilobars pressure: geophysical significance and implications for charge transport and melt structure. J Geophys Res 88(2):2413–2430.  https://doi.org/10.1029/JB088iB03p02413 Google Scholar
  81. von Bargen N, Waff HS (1986) Permeabilities, interfacial areas and curvatures of partially molten systems: results of numerical computations of equilibrium microstructures. J Geophys Res 91:9261–9276Google Scholar
  82. Waff HS (1974) Theoretical consideration of electrical conductivity in a partially molten mantle and implications for geothermometry. J Geophys Res 79(26):4003–4010Google Scholar
  83. Waff HS, Blau JR (1982) Experimental determination of near equilibrium textures in partially molten silicates at high pressures. In: Akimoto S, Manghnani MH (eds) High pressure research in geophysics. Center for Academic Publication, Tokyo, pp 229–236Google Scholar
  84. Waff HS, Faul UH (1992) Effects of crystalline anisotropy on fluid distribution in ultramafic partial melts. J Geophys Res 97(B6):9003.  https://doi.org/10.1029/92JB00066 Google Scholar
  85. Wagner L, Forsyth DW, Fouch MJ, James DE (2010) Detailed three-dimensional shear wave velocity structure of the northwestern United States from Rayleigh wave tomography. Earth Planet Sci Lett 299(3–4):273–284.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2010.09.005 Google Scholar
  86. Widmer R, Masters G, Gilbert F (1991) Spherically symmetric attenuation within the Earth from normal mode data. Geophys J Int 104(3):541–553.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1991.tb05700.x Google Scholar
  87. Yoshino T, Takei Y, Wark DA, Watson EB (2005) Grain boundary wetness of texturally equilibrated rocks, with implications for seismic properties of the upper mantle. J Geophys Res B Solid Earth 110(8):1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JB003544 Google Scholar
  88. Yoshino T, Nishihara Y, Ichiro Karato S (2007) Complete wetting of olivine grain boundaries by a hydrous melt near the mantle transition zone. Earth Planet Sci Lett, 256(3–4):466–472.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2007.02.002 Google Scholar
  89. Yoshino T, Yamazaki D, Mibe K (2009) Well-wetted olivine grain boundaries in partially molten peridotite in the asthenosphere. Earth Planet Sci Lett 283(1–4):167–173.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2009.04.007 Google Scholar
  90. Yoshino T, Laumonier M, McIsaac E, Katsura T (2010) Electrical conductivity of basaltic and carbonatite melt-bearing peridotites at high pressures: implications for melt distribution and melt fraction in the upper mantle. Earth Planet Sci Lett 295(3–4):593–602.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2010.04.050 Google Scholar
  91. Zhang B, Yoshino T, Yamazaki D, Manthilake G, Katsura T (2014) Electrical conductivity anisotropy in partially molten peridotite under shear deformation. Earth Planet Sci Lett 405:98–109.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2014.08.018 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Université Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, IRD, OPGC, Laboratoire Magmas et VolcansClermont-FerrandFrance
  2. 2.UMET, Unité Matériaux Et Transformations, Bâtiment C6, University of LilleLilleFrance

Personalised recommendations