Is Local Resection of Anal Canal Tumors Feasible with Transanal Endoscopic Surgery?

  • Xavier Serra-Aracil
  • Andrea Campos-Serra
  • Laura Mora-López
  • Sheila Serra-Pla
  • Anna Pallisera-Lloveras
  • Roser Flores-Clotet
  • Alba Zárate-Pinedo
  • Salvador Navarro-SotoEmail author
Original Scientific Report with Video



An important drawback of local surgery for lesions in the anal canal is the difficulty of achieving en bloc full-thickness resections. The aim of this study is to evaluate TEM/TEO in lesions of this type from the point of view of morbidity, mortality and the quality of the pathology specimen.


This is an observational study with prospective data collection from June 2004 to July 2018. Two groups are defined: group A (rectal tumors with proximal margin between 0 and ≤4 cm from anal verge) and group B (distal margin > 4 cm from anal verge). A technical description is provided; resections and postoperative complications in both groups are compared.


During the study period, 757 patients underwent TEM/TEO. Finally, 692 patients were included, 192 patients in group A and 500 patients in group B. An en bloc surgical specimen was obtained in 176/192 patients (91.7%), although the defect was completely sutured in 132 (68.8%). In the comparative analysis, group A did not present significantly greater fragmentation of the resected piece [16/192 (8.3%) vs. 36/500 (7.2%), p = 0.630], although group A was associated with greater involvement of the surgical margin [28/192 (14.6%), 32/500 (6.4%), p = 0.001] and clinically relevant morbidity [16/192 (8.3%), 20/500 (4%), p = 0.034]. There was no mortality.


The use of TEM/TEO to remove lesions originating in the anal canal is feasible. But we have to take into account that there is an increase in complications, technical difficulties and affected margins resection.



We thank the rest of the members of the Coloproctology Unit for applying the study protocol and Michael Maudsley for helping with the English.

Author contributions

All the authors agree to the submission of the paper. All the authors contributed to the design and writing of the paper.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (MP4 79184 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (MP4 67071 kb)


  1. 1.
    Heald RJRRD (1986) Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 28(1):1479–1482. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Buess G, Hutterer F, Theiss J, Böbem M, Isselhard W, Pinchimaier H (1984) A system for a transanal endoscopic rectum operation. Chirurg 55:677–680PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rocha JJ, Feres O (2008) Transanal endoscopic operation. A new proposal. Acta Cir Bras. 23(Supplement 1):93–104. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sharma A, Hartley J, Monson JRT (2003) Local excision of rectal tumors. Surg Oncol 12(1):51–61. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Serra-Aracil X, Ruiz-Edo N, Casalots-Casado A et al (2018) Importance of resection margins in the treatment of rectal adenomas by transanal endoscopic surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ortenzi M, Ghiselli R, Cappelletti Trombettoni MM, Cardinali L, Guerrieri M (2016) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery as optimal option in treatment of rare rectal lesions. A single center experience. World J Gastrointest Endosc 8(17):623–627. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sun G, Tang Y, Li X, Meng J, Liang G (2014) Analysis of 116 cases of rectal cancer treated by transanal local excision. World J Surg Oncol 12(1):1–6. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Serra-Aracil X, Mora-Lopez L, Alcantara-Moral M, Caro-Tarrago A, Gomez-Diaz CJ, Navarro-Soto S (2014) Transanal endoscopic surgery in rectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 20(33):11538–11545. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Serra-Aracil X, Vallverdú H, Bombardó-Junca J, Pericay-Pijaume C, Urgellés-Bosch J, Navarro-Soto S (2008) Long-term follow-up of local rectal cancer surgery by transanal endoscopic microsurgery. World J Surg 32(6):1162–1167. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Serra-Aracil X, Mora-Lopez L, Alcantara-Moral M, Corredera-Cantarin C, Gomez-Diaz C, Navarro-Soto S (2014) Atypical indications for transanal endoscopic microsurgery to avoid major surgery. Tech Coloproctol 18(2):157–164. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nivatvongs S, Stern H (1981) The length of the anal canal. Dis Colon Rectum 28(8):600–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Serra-Aracil X, Labró-Ciurans M, Rebasa-Cladera P et al (2018) Morbidity after transanal endoscopic microsurgery: risk factors for postoperative complications and the design of a 1-day surgery program. Surg Endosc. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Slankamenac K, Graf R, Barkun J, Puhan MA, Clavien PA (2013) The comprehensive complication index: a novel continuous scale to measure surgical morbidity. Ann Surg 258(1):1–7. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Serra-Aracil X, Pallisera-Lloveras A, Mora-Lopez L et al (2018) Transanal endoscopic surgery is effective and safe after endoscopic polypectomy of potentially malignant rectal polyps with questionable margins. Colorectal Dis 20(9):789–796. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Parks A (1972) Transanal technique in low rectal anastomosis. Proc R Soc Med 65:975–976PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Molina G, Bordeianou L, Shellito P, Sylla P (2016) Transanal endoscopic resection with peritoneal entry: a word of caution. Surg Endosc 30(5):1816–1825. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Martin-Perez B, Andrade-Ribeiro GD, Hunter L, Atallah S (2014) A systematic review of transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) from 2010 to 2013. Tech Coloproctol 18(9):775–788. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Slack T, Wong S, Muhlmann M (2014) Transanal minimally invasive surgery: an initial experience. ANZ J Surg 84(3):177–180. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ragupathi M, Maele DV, Nieto J, Pickron TB, Haas EM (2012) Transanal endoscopic video-assisted (TEVA) excision. Surg Endosc 26(12):3528–3535. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Serra-Aracil X, Mora-López L, Alcantara-Moral M, Caro-Tarrago A, Navarro-Soto S (2014) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery with 3-D (TEM) or high-definition 2-D transanal endoscopic operation (TEO) for rectal tumors. A prospective, randomized clinical trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 29(5):605–610. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dulskas A, Kilius A, Petrulis K, Samalavicius NE (2017) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for patients with rectal tumors: a single institution’s experience. Ann Coloproctol 33(1):23–27. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Laliberte AS, Lebrun A, Drolet S, Bouchard P, Bouchard A (2015) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery as an outpatient procedure is feasible and safe. Surg Endosc 29(12):3454–3459. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kikuchi R, Takano M, Takagi K et al (1995) Management of early invasive colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 38:1286–1295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nascimbeni R, Burgart LJ, Nivatvongs S, Larson DR (2002) Risk of lymph node metastasis in T1 carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 45(2):200–206. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gracia Solanas JA, Ramirez Rodriguez JM, Aguilella Diago V, Elia Guedea M, Martinez Diez M (2006) A prospective study about functional and anatomic consequences of transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 98:234–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    López LM, Serra-Aracil X, Soto SN (2015) Sphincter lesions observed on ultrasound after transanal endoscopic surgery. World J Gastroenterol 21(46):13160–13165. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mora López L, Serra Aracil X, Hermoso Bosch J, Rebasa P, Navarro Soto S (2015) Study of anorectal function after transanal endoscopic surgery. Int J Surg 13:142–147. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xavier Serra-Aracil
    • 1
  • Andrea Campos-Serra
    • 1
  • Laura Mora-López
    • 1
  • Sheila Serra-Pla
    • 1
  • Anna Pallisera-Lloveras
    • 1
  • Roser Flores-Clotet
    • 1
  • Alba Zárate-Pinedo
    • 1
  • Salvador Navarro-Soto
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Coloproctology Unit, General and Digestive Surgery Service, Parc Tauli University Hospital, SabadellUniversitat Autònoma de BarcelonaSabadellSpain

Personalised recommendations