Advertisement

Which is Better for Patients with Breast Cancer: Totally Implanted Vascular Access Devices (TIVAD) or Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC)?

  • Adriana Toro
  • Elena Schembari
  • Edoardo Mattone
  • Isidoro Di CarloEmail author
Letter to the Editor
  • 113 Downloads

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Tang TT, Liu L, Li CX, Li YT, Zhou T, Li HP, Wang J (2019) Which is better for patients with breast cancer: totally implanted vascular access devices (TIVAD) or peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC)? World J Surg 43:2245–2249.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-019-05022-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Di Carlo I, Pulvirenti E, Mannino M, Toro A (2010) Increased use of percutaneous technique for totally implantable venous access devices. Is it real progress? A 27-year comprehensive review on early complications. Ann Surg Oncol 17:1649–1656CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Di Carlo I, Toro A (2017) The totally implantable venous access device with occurrence of pneumothorax still remains an issue. World J Surg 41:1398.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3850-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adriana Toro
    • 2
  • Elena Schembari
    • 1
  • Edoardo Mattone
    • 1
  • Isidoro Di Carlo
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies “GF Ingrassia”, Cannizzaro HospitalUniversity of CataniaCataniaItaly
  2. 2.Department of General SurgeryE. Muscatello HospitalAugustaItaly

Personalised recommendations