Advertisement

Enabling Community Health Worker Recognition and Referral of Surgical Diseases: Pilot Study Results of a Pictorial Guide

  • Sebastian Gualy
  • Christopher Herrera
  • Clara Warden
  • Tyron Valle
  • Jeanie Barnum
  • Bessy Colman
  • Armando Siu
  • Jordan W. SwansonEmail author
Surgery in Low and Middle Income Countries
  • 12 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Access to surgical care is a pressing challenge, particularly for vulnerable populations. Informal and formal community health workers (CHWs), including lay people, increasingly function in pivotal roles in primary care, however, remain disconnected from surgical care in most environments. This study examined the degree to which CHW understanding of surgical conditions could be improved through the use of a pictorially based manual.

Methods

A manual and associated situational problem-solving questionnaire instrument were developed and contextualized through focus groups in Central America. A baseline assessment was obtained. In the program implementation, cohorts of formal and informal CHWs were introduced and trained to use the manual through a short curriculum. Assessment was repeated in program implementation, first with access to relevant manual content only, and then after the teaching session. Participants were also surveyed about manual scheme, usability, and utility.

Results

A total of 100 subjects (67% female) participated in baseline assessment, and 403 subjects (68% female) were assessed through the program implementation. Baseline problem-solving averaged 11.8 (SD 2.46) out of a possible 20 points. Mean score increased to 15.4 (SD 3.10) when participants had access to relevant surgical manual content and again to 15.9 (SD 3.09, p < 0.0001) following participation with an instructive curriculum. Participant score while utilizing the manual correlated with amount of education completed (r = 0.26), but baseline score did not. High readability 389 (96%) and high self-reported willingness for use 398 (96%) were noted.

Conclusion

Baseline familiarity with surgically treatable conditions appears modest among rural Central American populations, and improves with access to a contextualized, pictorial manual focused on recognizing and appropriately referring surgical conditions.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank our colleagues in Honduras, Julissa Colman from the Department of Education and Alex Guerrero from Operation Smile, for assistance with recruitment of participants and administration of the curriculum and assessment tool. We thank Dr. Marco Swanson for overseeing initial stakeholder meetings and design of the manual.

Funding

Dr. Jordan Swanson is funded in part by the UBS Optimus Foundation. Chris Herrera and Sebastian Gualy were supported in part by the Agnew Surgical Society and the Center for Global Health at the Perelman School of Medicine. Clara Warden was supported by the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, through Grant R25-HL084665. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. Operation Smile International, Agnew Surgical Society.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares that they have no conflict of interest, real or potential.

References

  1. 1.
    Meara JG, Leather AJ, Hagander L et al (2015) Global surgery 2030: evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development. Lancet 386:569–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sixty-Eighth World Health Assembly: WHA68.15 (2015) World Health Organization, vol 68, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Higashi H, Barendregt JJ, Kassebaum NJ et al (2015) Surgically avertable burden of digestive diseases at first-level hospitals in low and middle-income regions. Surgery 157:411–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Higashi H, Barendregt JJ, Kassebaum NJ et al (2015) Burden of injuries avertable by a basic surgical package in low- and middle-income regions: a systematic analysis from the global burden of disease 2010 study. World J Surg 39:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2685-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Contini S (2007) Surgery in developing countries: why and how to meet surgical needs worldwide. Acta Biomedica de l’Ateneo Parmense 78:4–5Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    DeVries CR, Rosenberg JS (2016) Global surgical ecosystems: a need for systems strengthening. Ann Glob Health 82:605–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kaseje N, Swanson J, Marks I et al (2018) Health system assessment for safe surgical care in rural Nicaragua: a retrospective survey. Lancet Glob Health 6:S16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bender DE, Pitkin K (1987) Bridging the gap: the village health worker as the cornerstone of the primary health care model. Soc Sci Med 24:515–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    George A, Menotti EP, Rivera D et al (2011) Community case management in Nicaragua: lessons in fostering adoption and expanding implementation. Health Policy Plan 26:327–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Barnes MD, Fairbanks J (1997) Problem-based strategies promoting community transformation: implications for the community health worker model. Family Community Health 20:54–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Olaniran A, Smith H, Unkels R et al (2017) Who is a community health worker?—a systematic review of definitions. Glob Health Act 10:1Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Satterfield D, Burd C, Valdez L et al (2002) The “in-between people”: participation of community health representatives in diabetes prevention and care in American Indian and Alaska Native communities. Health Promot Pract 3:166–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lewin SA, Dick J, Pond P et al (2005) Lay health workers in primary and community health care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.  https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004015.pub2 Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rivera D, Shah R, Guenther T et al (2017) Integrated community case management (iCCM) of childhood infection saves lives in hard-to-reach communities in Nicaragua. Rev Panam Salud Publica 41:66Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Charleston R, Johnson L, Tam L (1994) CHWs trained in ARI management. Sante Salud 4:14Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Benskin LLL (2012) A concept development of the village health worker. Nurs Forum 47:173–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rodriguez-Galindo C, Wilson MW, Chantada G et al (2008) Retinoblastoma: one world, one vision. Pediatrics 122:763–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fleming M, King C, Rajeev S et al (2017) Surgical referral coordination from a first-level hospital: a prospective case study from rural Nepal. BMC Health Serv Res 17:676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Quillian JP (1993) Community health workers and primary health care in Honduras. J Am Acad Nurse Pract 5:219–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Campbell C, Scott K (2011) Retreat from Alma Ata? The WHO’s report on task shifting to community health workers for AIDS care in poor countries. Glob Public Health 6:125–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mock CN, Donkor P, Gawande A et al (2015) Essential surgery: key messages. In: Debas HT, Donkor P, Gawande A et al (eds) Disease control priorities: essential surgery. World Bank, Washington, pp 1–18Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sebastian Gualy
    • 1
    • 3
    • 4
  • Christopher Herrera
    • 1
    • 3
    • 4
  • Clara Warden
    • 1
  • Tyron Valle
    • 5
  • Jeanie Barnum
    • 3
    • 4
  • Bessy Colman
    • 3
    • 4
  • Armando Siu
    • 3
    • 4
  • Jordan W. Swanson
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.Perelman School of MedicineUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Division of Plastic SurgeryChildren’s Hospital of PhiladelphiaPhiladelphiaUSA
  3. 3.Operation SmileTegucigalpaHonduras
  4. 4.Operation SmileManaguaNicaragua
  5. 5.General SurgeryHospital Carlos CentenoSiunaNicaragua

Personalised recommendations