Cumulative Exposure to Ionizing Radiation Among Surgeons During Intraoperative Cholangiography
Intraoperative cholangiography (IOC), even though is an important tool in biliary surgery, it is still a matter of debate when used as a routine procedure, this supported in the surgical and legal safety for the patient and the surgeon. We do not have knowledge of the real expositional risk of the surgeon to ionizing radiation (IR) during the cholangiography procedure, because many surgeons do not use protection and dosimeters, so we cannot determine occupational radiation exposure.
A prospective cohort study was conducted to assess the radiation exposure of a group of surgeons performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, regardless of the type of surgery (elective or urgent). A descriptive, bivariate analysis was made, with a linear simulation model for prediction. We evaluate the frequency of use of protection-established devices, number of images per surgery, and frequency of IOC. The radiation received was measured by dosimeters at different distances.
A total of 597 IOC were made in the evaluated period. Mean number of IOC per surgeon was five monthly, with an average of two images per surgery. 60% of surgeons did not use protection devices during IOC. The surgeon radiation received was 0.147 millisieverts (mSv) at 1 m, 0.039 mSv at 1.6 m, and 0.007 mSv at 2.5 m.
The volume, quality, and sufficiency of protection, coupled with the distance to the X-ray generator, are the major determinants to define the exposure to IR. We can predict the annual ionizing radiation according to the volume of the accomplished procedures. Although exposure doses are really low and make this a safe procedure, continuous exposure can lead to serious illnesses.
International Commission on Radiological Protection
We have not received financial support for the preparation of this study. The research and ethics committee of the institution reviewed and approved the development of this research.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.Mirrizi P (1937) Operative cholangiography. Surg Gynecol Obstet 65:702–710Google Scholar
- 2.Mirizzi PL, Quiroza LC (1931) La exploracion de las vias biliares principales en el curso de la operacion. Proc Third Argent Cong Surg 1:694Google Scholar
- 9.Radiological IC on, Protection I (2007) The 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP 37(2–4):1–332Google Scholar
- 13.Southern Scientific. Electronic personal dosimeter, MYDOSE mini PDM-227—Southern Scientific [Internet]. https://www.southernscientific.co.uk/products-by-manufacturer/aloka/mydose-mini-pdm-227?source=1206. Accessed 22 Jan 2019
- 14.Rehani MM, Ciraj-Bjelac O, Vano E, Miller DL, Walsh S, Giordano BD et al (2010) ICRP Publication 117. Radiological protection in fluoroscopically guided procedures performed outside the imaging department. Ann ICRP 40(6):1–102Google Scholar
- 16.UNCEARS: United Nations of Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. UNSCEAR 2008 report—vol I: sources [Internet]. http://www.unscear.org/unscear/publications/2008_1.html. Accessed 3 March 2019
- 18.Miller DL, Vano E, Bartal G, Balter S, Dixon R, Padovani R et al (2010) Occupational radiation protection in interventional radiology: a joint guideline of the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology Society of Europe and the Society of Interventional Radiology. J Vasc Interv Radiol 21(5):607–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar