Advertisement

Laparoscopic Central Bisectionectomy and Right Anterior Sectionectomy Using Two Retraction Methods: Technical Aspects with Video

  • Il Han Jeung
  • Sung Hoon ChoiEmail author
  • Seungki Kim
  • Sung Won Kwon
Original Scientific Report with Video

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic central bisectionectomy and right anterior sectionectomy for centrally located tumors are technically demanding surgeries. Here, we introduce our laparoscopic technique and present the associated perioperative outcomes relative to an open approach.

Methods

From April 2014 to November 2017, 26 patients underwent central bisectionectomy or right anterior sectionectomy. A total of 17 patients underwent the laparoscopic approach and nine underwent an open approach. We used a perihilar Glissonian approach to determine each anatomical resection plane and employed a rubber band self-retraction technique to ensure proper exposure of the two resection planes. Detailed descriptions, illustrations, video, and perioperative outcomes of the approach are presented.

Results

Among patients who underwent the laparoscopic approach, there were no cases of conversion to open surgery. The mean operative times for the laparoscopic and open groups were similar (333 ± 76 vs. 305 ± 62 min, respectively, p = 0.345). Intraoperative blood loss (535 ± 443 vs. 966 ± 650, p = 0.056) and postoperative complications (1 vs. 3, p = 0.065) were slightly less in the laparoscopic group, but the difference was not statistically significant. Surgical margins of both approaches were comparable (0.8 ± 0.6 vs. 0.7 ± 0.2 cm, p = 0.671). The length of hospital stay after surgery was significantly shorter in the laparoscopic group (8.8 ± 2.6 vs. 17.1 ± 12.7 days, p = 0.015).

Conclusion

The laparoscopic approach for central bisectionectomy and right anterior sectionectomy described in this study is feasible and safe with respect to short-term perioperative outcomes and may provide several benefits commonly attributed to minimally invasive surgery in selected patients.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express special thanks to Yoon Jang (Medical student, CHA medical University, Seongnam, Republic of Korea) for the comprehensive narration of this multimedia article.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Dr. Il Han Jeung, Sung Hoon Choi, Seungki Kim, and Sung Won Kwon have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Supplementary material

268_2019_5154_MOESM1_ESM.wmv (71.9 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (WMV 73620 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Alkhalili E, Berber E (2014) Laparoscopic liver resection for malignancy: a review of the literature. World J Gastroenterol 20:13599–13606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Di Carlo I, Toro A (2015) Is it time to change the standard procedure for hepatocellular carcinoma from an open to a laparoscopic approach? J Am Coll Surg 220:975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schiffman SC, Kim KH, Tsung A et al (2015) Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: a metaanalysis of 610 patients. Surgery 157:211–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Parks KR, Kuo YH, Davis JM et al (2014) Laparoscopic versus open liver resection: a meta-analysis of long-term outcome. HPB 16:109–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ban D, Tanabe M, Ito H et al (2014) A novel difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 21:745–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kawaguchi Y, Fuks D, Kokudo N et al (2018) Difficulty of laparoscopic liver resection: proposal for a new classification. Ann Surg 267:13–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ho CM, Wakabayashi G, Nitta H et al (2013) Total laparoscopic limited anatomical resection for centrally located hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic liver. Surg Endosc 27:1820–1825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Machado MA, Kalil AN (2011) Glissonian approach for laparoscopic mesohepatectomy. Surg Endosc 25:2020–2022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yoon YS, Han HS, Cho JY et al (2009) Totally laparoscopic central bisectionectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 19:653–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cho CW, Rhu J, Kwon CHD et al (2017) Short-term outcomes of totally laparoscopic central hepatectomy and right anterior sectionectomy for centrally located tumors: a case-matched study with propensity score matching. World J Surg 41:2838–2846.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4105-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wolters U, Wolf T, Stutzer H et al (1996) ASA classification and perioperative variables as predictors of postoperative outcome. Br J Anaesth 77:217–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Han HS, Shehta A, Ahn S et al (2015) Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: case-matched study with propensity score matching. J Hepatol 63:643–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Koch M, Garden OJ, Padbury R et al (2011) Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a definition and grading of severity by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. Surgery 149:680–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ishii M, Mizuguchi T, Harada K et al (2014) Comprehensive review of post-liver resection surgical complications and a new universal classification and grading system. World J Hepatol 6:745–751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rahbari NN, Garden OJ, Padbury R et al (2011) Posthepatectomy liver failure: a definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS). Surgery 149:713–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Choi SH, Choi GH, Han DH et al (2015) Laparoscopic liver resection using a rubber band retraction technique: usefulness and perioperative outcome in 100 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 29:387–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lee SY, Sadot E, Chou JF et al (2015) Central hepatectomy versus extended hepatectomy for liver malignancy: a matched cohort comparison. HPB (Oxford) 17:1025–1032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    van Gulik TM, van den Esschert JW, de Graaf W et al (2008) Controversies in the use of portal vein embolization. Dig Surg 25:436–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kim WJ, Kim KH, Shin MH et al (2017) Totally laparoscopic anatomical liver resection for centrally located tumors: a single center experience. Medicine (Baltimore) 96:e5560CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Il Han Jeung
    • 1
  • Sung Hoon Choi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Seungki Kim
    • 1
  • Sung Won Kwon
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Surgery, CHA Bundang Medical CenterCHA UniversitySeongnam-siKorea

Personalised recommendations