Advertisement

Correlation Between the Increased Hospital Volume and Decreased Overall Perioperative Mortality in One Universal Health Care System

  • Jin-Ming Wu
  • Te-Wei HoEmail author
  • Yu-Wen TienEmail author
Original Scientific Report

Abstract

Background

Volume–outcome relationship has been demonstrated extensively for short-term outcomes for oncological surgery. However, its effect on long-term surgical outcomes or in one universal health care (UHC) system is unknown. This retrospective population-based study aims to validate the correlation between the increased hospital volume and better short- and long-term outcomes in patients who underwent total gastrectomy (TG) for gastric cancer.

Methods

From the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database, we examined 7905 patients who underwent TG between 2000 and 2010. The surgical outcomes of this study were defined as death within 30, 60, and 180 days after TG.

Results

A total of 7905 subjects were included for analysis. The mean age was 65.8 years, and 68.8% were males. The 30-, 60-, and 180-day mortality rates after TG for gastric cancer were 2.7%, 6.2%, and 18.2%, respectively. On the multivariate analysis, TG at high-volume hospitals significantly contributed to lower 30-day (odds ratio 0.64; 95% confidence interval 0.48–0.85; P < 0.001), 60-day (odds ratio 0.68; 95% confidence interval 0.56–0.82; P < 0.001), and 180-day mortality rates (odds ratio 0.80; 95% confidence interval 0.70–0.90; P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Although TG is a complex operation with high mortality rates (~180-day), high hospital volume correlates with better perioperative outcomes even in UHC system. Hence, the strategy to advocate the centralization of TG is reasonable, especially for the elderly.

Abbreviations

TG

Total gastrectomy

CI

Confidence interval

DM

Diabetes mellitus

NHIRD

National Health Insurance Research Database

ICD-9-CM

International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study is based on data from the Collaboration Center of Health Information Application of the Ministry of Health and Welfare, which had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. This study was supported by Grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST 105-2221-E-002-192 & 107-2634-F-002-015), and from the National Taiwan University Hospital (105-N3315).

Supplementary material

268_2019_5025_MOESM1_ESM.docx (18 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 18 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Okholm C, Svendsen LB, Achiam MP (2014) Status and prognosis of lymph node metastasis in patients with cardia cancer—a systematic review. Surg Oncol 23:140–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gao S, Zhou F, Zhao C et al (2016) Gastric cardia adenocarcinoma microRNA profiling in Chinese patients. Tumour Biol 37:9411–9422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dubecz A, Solymosi N, Stadlhuber RJ et al (2014) Does the incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastric cardia continue to rise in the twenty-first century?—a SEER database analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 18:124–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A (2012) Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 62:10–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nitenberg G, Raynard B (2000) Nutritional support of the cancer patient: issues and dilemmas. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 34:137–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV et al (2002) Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 346:1128–1137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sugoor P, Shah S, Dusane R et al (2016) Proximal gastrectomy versus total gastrectomy for proximal third gastric cancer: total gastrectomy is not always necessary. Langenbecks Arch Surg 401:687–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lin HC, Xirasagar S, Lee HC et al (2006) Hospital volume and inpatient mortality after cancer-related gastrointestinal resections: the experience of an Asian country. Ann Surg Oncol 13:1182–1188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    LaPar DJ, Bhamidipati CM, Mery CM et al (2010) Primary payer status affects mortality for major surgical operations. Ann Surg 252:544–550 discussion 550-541 Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Xiao D, Zheng C, Jindal M et al (2018) Medicaid expansion and disparity reduction in surgical cancer care at high-quality hospitals. J Am Coll Surg 226:22–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W et al (1998) The Department of Veterans Affairs’ NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg 228:491–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Weledji EP, Verla V (2016) Failure to rescue patients from early critical complications of oesophagogastric cancer surgery. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 7:34–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ghaferi AA, Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB (2009) Complications, failure to rescue, and mortality with major inpatient surgery in medicare patients. Ann Surg 250:1029–1034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mise Y, Vauthey JN, Zimmitti G et al (2015) Ninety-day postoperative mortality is a legitimate measure of hepatopancreatobiliary surgical quality. Ann Surg 262:1071–1078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Byrne BE, Mamidanna R, Vincent CA et al (2013) Population-based cohort study comparing 30- and 90-day institutional mortality rates after colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 100:1810–1817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shirabe K, Shimada M, Gion T et al (1999) Postoperative liver failure after major hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in the modern era with special reference to remnant liver volume. J Am Coll Surg 188:304–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wu CY, Chen YJ, Ho HJ et al (2012) Association between nucleoside analogues and risk of hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence following liver resection. JAMA 308:1906–1914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ho TW, Wu JM, Yang CY et al (2016) Total gastrectomy improves glucose metabolism on gastric cancer patients: a nationwide population-based study. Surg Obes Relat Dis 12:635–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tsai MS, Wang YC, Kao YH et al (2015) Preexisting diabetes and risks of morbidity and mortality after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a nationwide database study. Medicine (Baltimore) 94:e1467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Coe TM, Rose JA, Chang DC (2014) Expanding our understanding of patient outcomes: the unique role of health services research in the continuing evolution of surgical science. Vasc Endovasc Surg 48:356–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ailon T, Tee J, Manson N et al (2019) Patient-reported outcomes following surgery for degenerative spondylolitshtesis: comparison of a universal and multitier health care system. Spine J 19:24–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Watkins DA, Jamison DT, Mills T et al (2017) Universal health coverage and essential packages of care. In: Jamison DT, Gelband H, et al (eds) Disease control priorities: improving health and reducing poverty, chap 3. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Petrou P, Samoutis G, Lionis C (2018) Single-payer or a multipayer health system: a systematic literature review. Public Health 163:141–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cheng TM (2015) Reflections on the 20th anniversary of Taiwan’s single-payer National Health Insurance System. Health Aff (Millwood) 34:502–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jacobs K, Lucia L (2018) Universal Health Care: lessons from San Francisco. Health Aff (Millwood) 37:1375–1382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ganti S, Hadad S, Sheffield Surgical Journal C (2012) Comparison of 30-day, 90-day and in-hospital postoperative mortality for eight different cancer types (Br J Surg 2012; 99: 1149–1154). Br J Surg 99:1602; author reply 1602–1603Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Watanabe M, Miyata H, Gotoh M et al (2014) Total gastrectomy risk model: data from 20,011 Japanese patients in a nationwide internet-based database. Ann Surg 260:1034–1039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Selby LV, Vertosick EA, Sjoberg DD et al (2015) Morbidity after total gastrectomy: analysis of 238 patients. J Am Coll Surg 220(863–871):e862Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bartlett EK, Roses RE, Kelz RR et al (2014) Morbidity and mortality after total gastrectomy for gastric malignancy using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Surgery 156:298–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Stitzenberg KB, Meropol NJ (2010) Trends in centralization of cancer surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 17:2824–2831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Massarweh NN, Anaya DA, Kougias P et al (2017) Variation and impact of multiple complications on failure to rescue after inpatient surgery. Ann Surg 266:59–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Shu B, Lei S, Li F et al (2015) Short and long-term outcomes after gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma in elderly patients. Int J Clin Exp Med 8:13578–13584Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Opelz G, Terasaki PI (1980) Dominant effect of transfusions on kidney graft survival. Transplantation 29:153–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Amato A, Pescatori M (2006) Perioperative blood transfusions for the recurrence of colorectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD005033Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ejaz A, Spolverato G, Kim Y et al (2015) Impact of blood transfusions and transfusion practices on long-term outcome following hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 19:887–896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ferraris VA, Davenport DL, Saha SP et al (2012) Surgical outcomes and transfusion of minimal amounts of blood in the operating room. Arch Surg 147:49–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Odell DD, Bilimoria KY (2016) Evaluating appropriate blood transfusion in cancer surgery. JAMA Surg 151:525–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Epelboym I, Gawlas I, Lee JA et al (2014) Limitations of ACS-NSQIP in reporting complications for patients undergoing pancreatectomy: underscoring the need for a pancreas-specific module. World J Surg 38:1461–1467.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2439-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Baker RS, Foote J, Kemmeter P et al (2004) The science of stapling and leaks. Obes Surg 14:1290–1298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lee WJ, Chen TC, Lai IR et al (2003) Randomized clinical trial of Ligasure versus conventional surgery for extended gastric cancer resection. Br J Surg 90:1493–1496CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital and College of MedicineNational Taiwan UniversityTaipeiTaiwan, ROC

Personalised recommendations