Advertisement

Early Acute Kidney Injury Within an Established Enhanced Recovery Pathway: Uncommon and Transitory

  • Fabian Grass
  • Jenna K. Lovely
  • Jacopo Crippa
  • Kellie L. Mathis
  • Martin Hübner
  • David W. LarsonEmail author
Original Scientific Report
  • 25 Downloads

Abstract

Background

The present study aimed to assess the impact of perioperative fluid management on early acute kidney injury (AKI) rate and long-term sequelae in patients undergoing elective colorectal procedures within an enhanced recovery pathway (ERP).

Methods

Retrospective analysis of consecutive patients from a prospectively maintained ERP database (2011–2015) is performed. Pre- and postoperative creatinine levels (within 24 h) were compared according to risk (preoperative creatinine rise ×1.5), injury (×2), failure (×3), loss of kidney function and end-stage kidney disease (RIFLE) criteria. Risk factors for early AKI were identified through logistic regression analysis, and long-term outcome in patients with AKI was assessed.

Results

Out of 7103 patients, 4096 patients (58%) with pre- and postoperative creatinine levels were included. Of these, 104 patients (2.5%) presented postoperative AKI. AKI patients received higher amounts of POD 0 fluids (3.8 ± 2.4 vs. 3.2 ± 2 L, p = 0.01) and had increased postoperative weight gain at POD 2 (6 ± 4.9 vs. 3 ± 2.7 kg, p = 0.007). Independent risk factors for AKI were high ASA score (ASA ≥ 3: OR 1.7; 95% CI 1.1–2.5), prolonged operating time (>180 min: OR 1.9; 95% CI 1.3–2.9) and diabetes mellitus (OR 2.5; 95% CI 1.5–4), while minimally invasive surgery was a protective factor (OR 0.6; 95% CI 0.4–0.9). Five patients (0.1%) developed chronic kidney disease, and two of them needed dialysis after a mean follow-up of 33.7 ± 22.4 months.

Conclusions

Early AKI was very uncommon in the present cohort of colorectal surgery patients treated within an ERP, and long-term sequelae were exceptionally low.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Fabian Grass was supported by the Société Académique Vaudoise, Lausanne, Switzerland, and by the SICPA foundation, Lausanne, Switzerland.

References

  1. 1.
    Eng OS, Melstrom LG, Carpizo DR (2015) The relationship of perioperative fluid administration to outcomes in colorectal and pancreatic surgery: a review of the literature. J Surg Oncol 111:472–477CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lobo DN, Bostock KA, Neal KR et al (2002) Effect of salt and water balance on recovery of gastrointestinal function after elective colonic resection: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 359:1812–1818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Feldheiser A, Aziz O, Baldini G et al (2016) Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) for gastrointestinal surgery, part 2: consensus statement for anaesthesia practice. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 60:289–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Thiele RH, Raghunathan K, Brudney CS et al (2016) American Society for Enhanced Recovery (ASER) and Perioperative Quality Initiative (POQI) joint consensus statement on perioperative fluid management within an enhanced recovery pathway for colorectal surgery. Perioper Med (Lond) 5:24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gupta R, Gan TJ (2016) Peri-operative fluid management to enhance recovery. Anaesthesia 71(Suppl 1):40–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Makaryus R, Miller TE, Gan TJ (2018) Current concepts of fluid management in enhanced recovery pathways. Br J Anaesth 120:376–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hassinger TE, Turrentine FE, Thiele RH et al (2018) Acute kidney injury in the age of enhanced recovery protocols. Dis Colon Rectum 61:946–954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Marcotte JH, Patel K, Desai R et al (2018) Acute kidney injury following implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in colorectal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 33:1259–1267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Myles PS, Bellomo R, Corcoran T et al (2018) Restrictive versus liberal fluid therapy for major abdominal surgery. N Engl J Med 378:2263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ingraham AM, Richards KE, Hall BL, Ko CY (2010) Quality improvement in surgery: the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program approach. Adv Surg 44:251–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Larson DW, Lovely JK, Cima RR et al (2014) Outcomes after implementation of a multimodal standard care pathway for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 101:1023–1030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lovely JK, Maxson PM, Jacob AK et al (2012) Case-matched series of enhanced versus standard recovery pathway in minimally invasive colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 99:120–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Khreiss W, Huebner M, Cima RR et al (2014) Improving conventional recovery with enhanced recovery in minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 57:557–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hubner M, Lovely JK, Huebner M et al (2013) Intrathecal analgesia and restrictive perioperative fluid management within enhanced recovery pathway: hemodynamic implications. J Am Coll Surg 216:1124–1134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Koeze J, Keus F, Dieperink W et al (2017) Incidence, timing and outcome of AKI in critically ill patients varies with the definition used and the addition of urine output criteria. BMC Nephrol 18:70CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Uhlig K, Macleod A, Craig J et al (2006) Grading evidence and recommendations for clinical practice guidelines in nephrology. A position statement from Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO). Kidney Int 70:2058–2065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shafie AA, Tan YP, Ng CH (2018) Systematic review of economic burden of heart failure. Heart Fail Rev 23:131–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    National KF (2015) KDOQI clinical practice guideline for hemodialysis adequacy: 2015 update. Am J Kidney Dis 66:884–930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kork F, Balzer F, Spies CD et al (2015) Minor postoperative increases of creatinine are associated with higher mortality and longer hospital length of stay in surgical patients. Anesthesiology 123:1301–1311CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Prowle JR, Echeverri JE, Ligabo EV et al (2010) Fluid balance and acute kidney injury. Nat Rev Nephrol 6:107–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Thacker JK, Mountford WK, Ernst FR et al (2016) Perioperative fluid utilization variability and association with outcomes: considerations for enhanced recovery efforts in sample US surgical populations. Ann Surg 263:502–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lobo DN, Stanga Z, Aloysius MM et al (2010) Effect of volume loading with 1 liter intravenous infusions of 0.9% saline, 4% succinylated gelatine (Gelofusine) and 6% hydroxyethyl starch (Voluven) on blood volume and endocrine responses: a randomized, three-way crossover study in healthy volunteers. Crit Care Med 38:464–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hobson C, Ruchi R, Bihorac A (2017) Perioperative acute kidney injury: risk factors and predictive strategies. Crit Care Clin 33:379–396CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Holubar SD, Hedrick T, Gupta R et al (2017) American Society for Enhanced Recovery (ASER) and Perioperative Quality Initiative (POQI) joint consensus statement on prevention of postoperative infection within an enhanced recovery pathway for elective colorectal surgery. Perioper Med (Lond) 6:4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    McEvoy MD, Scott MJ, Gordon DB et al (2017) American Society for Enhanced Recovery (ASER) and Perioperative Quality Initiative (POQI) joint consensus statement on optimal analgesia within an enhanced recovery pathway for colorectal surgery: part 1-from the preoperative period to PACU. Perioper Med (Lond) 6:8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W et al (2013) Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS((R))) Society recommendations. World J Surg 37:259–284. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1772-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Reisinger KW, Willigers HM, Jansen J et al (2017) Doppler-guided goal-directed fluid therapy does not affect intestinal cell damage but increases global gastrointestinal perfusion in colorectal surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Colorectal Dis 19:1081–1091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Phan TD, D’Souza B, Rattray MJ et al (2014) A randomised controlled trial of fluid restriction compared to oesophageal Doppler-guided goal-directed fluid therapy in elective major colorectal surgery within an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery program. Anaesth Intensive Care 42:752–760Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Som A, Maitra S, Bhattacharjee S, Baidya DK (2017) Goal directed fluid therapy decreases postoperative morbidity but not mortality in major non-cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Anesth 31:66–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bundgaard-Nielsen M, Secher NH, Kehlet H (2009) ‘Liberal’ vs. ‘restrictive’ perioperative fluid therapy: a critical assessment of the evidence. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 53:843–851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mehta RL, Kellum JA, Shah SV et al (2007) Acute Kidney injury network: report of an initiative to improve outcomes in acute kidney injury. Crit Care 11:R31CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Horres CR, Adam MA, Sun Z et al (2017) Enhanced recovery protocols for colorectal surgery and postoperative renal function: a retrospective review. Perioper Med (Lond) 6:13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Huebner M, Hubner M, Cima RR, Larson DW (2014) Timing of complications and length of stay after rectal cancer surgery. J Am Coll Surg 218:914–919CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Colon and Rectal SurgeryMayo ClinicRochesterUSA
  2. 2.Department of Visceral SurgeryLausanne University Hospital CHUVLausanneSwitzerland
  3. 3.Hospital Pharmacy ServicesMayo ClinicRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations