Advertisement

World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 43, Issue 3, pp 758–762 | Cite as

Bariatric Surgery Versus Lifestyle Intervention in Class I Obesity: 7–10-Year Results of a Retrospective Study

  • Antonio VitielloEmail author
  • Luigi Angrisani
  • Antonella Santonicola
  • Paola Iovino
  • Vincenzo Pilone
  • Pietro Forestieri
Original Scientific Report
  • 90 Downloads

Abstract

Introduction

The American Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) and the International Federation of Surgery for Obesity (IFSO) have both stated that bariatric surgery (BS) should not be denied in Class I patients. However, lifestyle intervention (LI), such as diet plus gym programs, is still considered the preferred approach for subjects with a BMI ranging from 30 to 35 kg/m2. The aim of this study was to retrospectively compare results of LI and BS in patients in Class I obesity.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of prospective maintained databases of two centers for the “Interdisciplinary Treatment of Obesity” was performed. All patients in Class I obesity and follow-up >7 years were included in the study. Subjects were divided into two groups: BS group that included patients who had undergone surgery and LI group that included patients who underwent lifestyle intervention (LI). Percentage of excess body mass index loss (%EBMIL) and comorbidities remission were recorded.

Results

Seventy-six patients were included in the study. Fifty-six subjects were submitted to surgery (BS group); 20 subjects were treated with nonsurgical approach (LI group). In BS group, 34 underwent laparoscopic adjustable gastric band, 13 laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), and 9 laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. EWL% resulted significantly higher in BS group at 1, 3, 5, 7 and 10 years (p < 0.01).

Conclusion

Bariatric surgery is more effective than LI for patients in Class I obesity. Due to its versatility, low-risk profile and high-effectiveness LSG could be the standard intervention for these patients.

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all patients submitted to surgery and included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Sjöström L (2008) Bariatric surgery and reduction in morbidity and mortality: experiences from the SOS study. Int J Obes (Lond) 32(Suppl 7):S93–S97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Martins C, Strommen M, Stavne OA et al (2011) Bariatric surgery versus lifestyle intervention for morbid obesity—changes in bodyweight, risk factors and comorbidities at 1 year. Obes Surg 21(841–849):4Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hofso D, Nordstrand N, Johnson LK et al (2010) Obesity-related cardiovascular risk factors after weight loss: a clinical trial comparing gastric bypass surgery and intensive lifestyle intervention. Eur J Endocrinol 163(735–745):5Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Anderson JW, Konz EC, Frederich RC, Wood CL (2001) Long-term weight-loss maintenance: a meta-analysis of US studies. Am J Clin Nutr 74(579–584):8Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sjostrom L, Lindroos AK, Peltonen M et al (2004) Lifestyle, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk factors 10 years after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med 351:2683–2693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Flegal KM, Kit BK, Orpana H, Graubard BI (2013) Association of all-cause mortality with overweight and obesity using standard body mass index categories: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 309(1):71–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chan JM, Rimm EB, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC (1994) Obesity, fat distribution, and weight gain as risk factors for clinical diabetes in men. Diabetes Care 17(9):961–969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nguyen NT, Magno CP, Lane KT, Hinojosa MW, Lane JS (2008) Association of hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and metabolic syndrome with obesity: findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999 to 2004. J Am Coll Surg 207(6):928–934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fried M, Hainer V, Basdevant A, Buchwald H, Dietel M, Finer N, Greve JW, Horber F, Mathus-Vliegen E, Scopinaro N, Steffen R, Tsigos C, Weiner R, Widhalm K (2008) Interdisciplinary European guidelines on surgery for severe obesity]. Rozhl Chir 87(9):468–476Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Foschi D, De Luca M, Sarro G, Bernante P, Zappa MA, Moroni R, Navarra G, Foletto M, Ceriani V, Piazza L, Di Lorenzo N (2016) LINEE GUIDA DI CHIRURGIA DELL’OBESITA’. SOCIETA’ ITALIANA DI CHIRURGIA DELL’OBESITA’ (SICOB)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    ASMBS Clinical Issues Committee (2013) Bariatric surgery in class I obesity (body mass index 30-35 kg/m2). Surg Obes Relat Dis 9(1):e1–e10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Busetto L, Dixon J, De Luca M, Shikora S, Pories W, Angrisani L (2014) Bariatric surgery in class I obesity: a Position Statement from the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO). Obes Surg 24(4):487–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    American Diabetes Association (2010) Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 33(Suppl 1):S62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    National Institute for Health and Clinical excellence. Hypertension (CG127). http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg127. 30 Oct 2013
  15. 15.
    Dixon JB, O’Brien PE, Playfair J et al (2008) Adjustable gastric banding and conventional therapy for type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 299:316–323Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    O’Brien PE, Dixon JB, Laurie C et al (2006) Treatment of mild to moderate obesity with laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding or an intensive medical program: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 144:625–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schauer PR, Kashyap SR, Wolski K et al (2012) Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy in obese patients with diabetes. N Engl J Med 26(366):1567–1576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lee WJ, Chong K, Ser KH et al (2011) Gastric bypass vs sleeve gastrectomy for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Surg 146:143–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Li Q, Chen L, Yang Z et al (2012) Metabolic effects of bariatric surgery in type 2 diabetic patients with body mass index o 35 kg/m2. Diabetes Obes Metab 14:262–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Angrisani L, Favretti F, Furbetta F et al (2004) Italian Group for Lap-Band System: results of multicenter study on patients with BMI r 35 kg/m2. Obes Surg 14:415–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cohen R, Pinheiro JC, Schiavon CA, Salles JE, Wajchenberg BL, Cummings DE (2012) Effects of gastric bypass surgery in patients with type 2 diabetes and only mild obesity. Diabetes Care 35:1420–1428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Abbatini F, Capoccia D, Casella G, Coccia F, Leonetti F, Basso N (2012) Type 2 diabetes in obese patients with body mass index of 30–35 kg/m2: sleeve gastrectomy versus medical treatment. Surg Obes Relat Dis 8:20–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Scopinaro N, Adami GF, Papadia FS et al (2011) The effects of biliopancreatic diversion on type 2 diabetes mellitus in patients with mild obesity (BMI 30–35 kg/m2) and simple overweight (BMI 25–30 kg/m2): a prospective controlled study. Obes Surg 21:880–888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    National Institutes of Health National Institutes of Health (1998) National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute: clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults. The Evidence ReportGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2006) Obesity. Guidance on the prevention, identification, assessment and management of overweight and obesity in adults and children. NICE Guidelines 43:1–84Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Avenell A, Brown TJ, McGee MA et al (2004) What are the long-term benefits of weight reducing diets in adults? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Hum Nutr Diet 17:317–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antonio Vitiello
    • 1
    Email author
  • Luigi Angrisani
    • 2
  • Antonella Santonicola
    • 3
  • Paola Iovino
    • 3
  • Vincenzo Pilone
    • 3
  • Pietro Forestieri
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Advanced Biomedical SciencesUniversity of Naples Federico IINaplesItaly
  2. 2.General, Laparoscopic and Emergency Surgery UnitSan Giovanni Bosco HospitalNaplesItaly
  3. 3.Department of Medicine, Surgery, and DentistryUniversity of SalernoSalernoItaly
  4. 4.Department of Clinical Medicine and SurgeryUniversity of Naples “Federico II”NaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations