World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 43, Issue 2, pp 604–607 | Cite as

Robotic Double Purse-String Telescoped Pancreaticogastrostomy: How I Do It

  • Taiga Wakabayashi
  • Emanuele Felli
  • Patrick PessauxEmail author
Innovative Surgical Techniques Around the World



Some articles have recently shown that robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is feasible and can be a safe method. On the other hand, pancreatic fistulas (PF) remain the most dreaded complication after PD, and a secured pancreaticoenteric reconstruction may be essential in this regard. Previous articles have highlighted the usefulness of telescoped pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) in open PD to reduce the risk of postoperative PF. Additionally, in 2016, Addeo et al. described a double purse-string telescoped PG (DPS-PG), simplified from previous techniques, with favorable short-term results.

Materials and methods

The attached video reports our standardized technique for robotic DPS-PG, which is based on Addeo’s approach. The main characteristic of this technique is an easy placement of two seromuscular purse-string sutures without the need for gastric wall dissection or deep pancreatic parenchymal sutures. We modified and developed Addeo’s technique to suit the robotic PD. In our robotic DPS-PG, there is no need to perform the opening of the distal gastric stump, the anterior gastrostomy, or the suture fixation of the pancreatic parenchyma to the stomach, as it could lead to a rupture of the pancreas, particularly when the parenchyma is soft.


We consider that our technique of robotic DPS-PG might be feasible and can be safely performed, just as a previously described technique in open surgery.


Further evaluation with clinical trials is required to validate its real benefits.



The authors are grateful to Iana Shutrova, Christopher Burel and Guy Temporal for their assistance in proofreading the manuscript, as well as to Catherine Cers for her digital illustrations, which serve as schematics in the present article.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (MP4 176299 kb)


  1. 1.
    Kornaropoulos M, Moris D, Beal EW et al (2017) Total robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review of the literature. Surg Endosc 31:4382–4392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen S, Chen J-Z, Zhan Q et al (2015) Robot-assisted laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective, matched, mid-term follow-up study. Surg Endosc 29:3698–3711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Addeo P, Rosso E, Fuchshuber P et al (2013) Double purse-string telescoped pancreaticogastrostomy: an expedient, safe, and easy technique. J Am Coll Surg 216:e27–e33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Memeo R, Tzedakis S, de Blasi V et al (2016) Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: operative steps (with video). Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 26:e91–e94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Giulianotti PC, Gonzalez-Heredia R, Esposito S et al (2018) Trans-gastric pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction after pylorus-preserving robotic Whipple: a proposal for a standardized technique. Surg Endosc 32:2169–2174CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Taiga Wakabayashi
    • 1
  • Emanuele Felli
    • 2
  • Patrick Pessaux
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Institut de Recherche Contre les Cancers de l’Appareil Digestif (IRCAD)StrasbourgFrance
  2. 2.Digestive and Endocrine surgery, Nouvel Hôpital CivilUniversité de StrasbourgStrasbourgFrance
  3. 3.Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire (IHU), Institute for Minimally Invasive Hybrid Image-Guided SurgeryUniversité de StrasbourgStrasbourgFrance

Personalised recommendations