Advertisement

World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 43, Issue 2, pp 594–603 | Cite as

Surgical and Long-Term Survival Outcomes After Laparoscopic and Open Total Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

  • Zhengyan LiEmail author
  • Yezhou Liu
  • Bin Bai
  • Deliang Yu
  • Bo Lian
  • Qingchuan ZhaoEmail author
Original Scientific Report
  • 115 Downloads

Abstract

Background

To compare the surgical and long-term survival outcomes of laparoscopic and open total gastrectomy (OTG) for locally advanced gastric cancer (AGC).

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated 308 and 900 patients in pathological locally AGC who underwent laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) or OTG between June 2008 and December 2014. We compared surgical and long-term outcomes between the two groups using propensity score matching method.

Results

The LTG group showed a longer operation time (261.42 vs. 171.00 min, P = 0.001), less blood loss (185.47 vs. 217.84 ml, P = 0.000), earlier time to first flatus (3.47 vs. 4.12 days, P = 0.000), earlier time to start liquid diet (3.76 vs. 4.27 days, P = 0.000), and shorter postoperative hospital stay (7.56 vs. 8.22 days, P = 0.007). The overall complication rate was 15.2% in the LTG group and 17.2% in the OTG (P = 0.503). No significant difference was observed in overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) between LTG and OTG (60.5% vs. 57.1%, P = 0.337; 57.4% vs. 54.4%, P = 0.341).

Conclusions

Compared to OTG, LTG provides surgical benefits and comparable survival outcomes for patients with locally AGC.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to medical staff of Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases for their management of database.

Funding

This is supported by the National Key Basic Research Program of China (No. 2014CBA02002).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

Drs. Zhengyan Li, Yezhou Liu, Bin Bai, Deliang Yu, Bo Lian, and Qingchuan Zhao have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Kitano SIY, Moriyama M, Sugimachi K (1994) Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 4:146–148Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kim YW, Yoon HM, Yun YH et al (2013) Long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: result of a randomized controlled trial (COACT 0301). Surg Endosc 27:4267–4276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sakuramoto S, Yamashita K, Kikuchi S et al (2013) Laparoscopy versus open distal gastrectomy by expert surgeons for early gastric cancer in Japanese patients: short-term clinical outcomes of a randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc 27:1695–1705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hayashi H, Ochiai T, Shimada H et al (2005) Prospective randomized study of open versus laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with extraperigastric lymph node dissection for early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 19:1172–1176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Takiguchi S, Fujiwara Y, Yamasaki M et al (2013) Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy versus open distal gastrectomy. A prospective randomized single-blind study. World J Surg 37:2379–2386.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2121-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hu Y, Huang C, Sun Y et al (2016) Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic versus open D2 distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 34:1350–1357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Park YK, Yoon HM, Kim YW et al (2017) Laparoscopy-assisted versus open D2 distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: results from a randomized phase II multicenter clinical trial (COACT 1001). Ann Surg 42:S98–S99Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Japanese Gastric Cancer A (2017) Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver. 4). Gastric Cancer Off J Int Gastric Cancer Assoc Jpn Gastric Cancer Assoc 20:1–19Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lin JX, Huang CM, Zheng CH et al (2016) Evaluation of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: results of a comparison with laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. Surg Endosc 30:1988–1998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kim DJ, Lee JH, Kim W (2015) Comparison of the major postoperative complications between laparoscopic distal and total gastrectomies for gastric cancer using Clavien-Dindo classification. Surg Endosc 29:3196–3204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Topal B, Leys E, Ectors N et al (2007) Determinants of complications and adequacy of surgical resection in laparoscopic versus open total gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma. Surg Endosc 22:980–984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sano T, Coit DG, Kim HH et al (2017) Proposal of a new stage grouping of gastric cancer for TNM classification: international gastric cancer association staging project. Gastric cancer Off J Int Gastric Cancer Assoc Jpn Gastric Cancer Assoc 20:217–225Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Du JZJ, Li Y, Li J, Ji G, Dong G, Yang Z, Wang W, Gao Z (2010) Laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy with extended lymph node resection for advanced gastric cancer—reports of 82 cases. Hepatogastroenterology 57:1589–1594Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fang C, Hua J, Li J et al (2014) Comparison of long-term results between laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy and open gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for advanced gastric cancer. Am J Surg 208:391–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bo T, Peiwu Y, Feng Q et al (2013) Laparoscopy-assisted vs. open total gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: long-term outcomes and technical aspects of a case-control study. J Gastrointest Surg 17:1202–1208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kim HS, Kim BS, Lee IS et al (2013) Comparison of totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy and open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 23:323–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Etoh T, Honda M, Kumamaru H, et al (2018) Morbidity and mortality from a propensity score-matched, prospective cohort study of laparoscopic versus open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: data from a nationwide web-based database. Surg Endosc 32:2766–2773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Eom BW, Kim YW, Lee SE et al (2012) Survival and surgical outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: case-control study. Surg Endosc 26:3273–3281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jeong O, Jung MR, Kim GY et al (2013) Comparison of short-term surgical outcomes between laparoscopic and open total gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma: case-control study using propensity score matching method. J Am Coll Surg 216:184–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lee JH, Nam BH, Ryu KW et al (2015) Comparison of outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted and open total gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Br J Surg 102:1500–1505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lu J, C-m Huang, C-h Zheng et al (2015) Short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic versus open total gastrectomy for elderly gastric cancer patients: a propensity score-matched analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 19:1949–1957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tsujimoto H, Ichikura T, Ono S et al (2009) Impact of postoperative infection on long-term survival after potentially curative resection for gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 16:311–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Li QG, Li P, Tang D et al (2013) Impact of postoperative complications on long-term survival after radical resection for gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 19:4060–4065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fujiya K, Tokunaga M, Mori K et al (2016) Long-term survival in patients with postoperative intra-abdominal infectious complications after curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score matching analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 23:809–816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Li Z, Bai B, Zhao Y, et al (2018) Severity of complications and long-term survival after laparoscopic total gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for advanced gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched, case-control study. Int J Surg 54:62–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sano T, Sasako M, Mizusawa J et al (2017) Randomized controlled trial to evaluate splenectomy in total gastrectomy for proximal gastric carcinoma. Ann Surg 265:277–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Huang CM, Chen T, Lin JX et al (2017) The effects of laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy on the surgical outcome of proximal gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched, case-control study. Surg Endosc 31:1383–1392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chen QY, Huang CM, Zheng CH et al (2016) Strategies of laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymph node dissection for advanced proximal gastric cancer. World J Gastrointest Surg 8:402–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ohkura Y, Haruta S, Shindoh J et al (2017) Efficacy of prophylactic splenectomy for proximal advanced gastric cancer invading greater curvature. World J Surg Oncol 15:106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Liu YY, Fang WL, Wang F et al (2017) Does a higher cutoff value of lymph node retrieval substantially improve survival in patients with advanced gastric cancer?-time to embrace a new digit. Oncologist 22:97–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zhao B, Zhang J, Chen X et al (2017) The retrieval of at least 25 lymph nodes should be essential for advanced gastric cancer patients with lymph node metastasis: a retrospective analysis of single-institution database study design: cohort study. Int J Surg 48:291–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Jeong O, Ryu SY, Zhao XF et al (2012) Short-term surgical outcomes and operative risks of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for gastric carcinoma: experience at a large-volume center. Surg Endosc 26:3418–3425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Dulucq JL, Wintringer P, Stabilini C et al (2005) Laparoscopic and open gastric resections for malignant lesions: a prospective comparative study. Surg Endosc 19:933–938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mochiki E, Toyomasu Y, Ogata K et al (2008) Laparoscopically assisted total gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for upper and middle gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 22:1997–2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sakuramoto S, Kikuchi S, Futawatari N et al (2009) Laparoscopy-assisted pancreas- and spleen-preserving total gastrectomy for gastric cancer as compared with open total gastrectomy. Surg Endosc 23:2416–2423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lee MS, Lee JH, Park DJ et al (2013) Comparison of short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy and open total gastrectomy in gastric cancer patients. Surg Endosc 27:2598–2605CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, the Fourth Military Medical UniversityXi’anChina

Personalised recommendations