Advertisement

World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 43, Issue 2, pp 299–330 | Cite as

Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Esophagectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations

  • Donald E. LowEmail author
  • William Allum
  • Giovanni De Manzoni
  • Lorenzo Ferri
  • Arul Immanuel
  • MadhanKumar Kuppusamy
  • Simon Law
  • Mats Lindblad
  • Nick Maynard
  • Joseph Neal
  • C. S. Pramesh
  • Mike Scott
  • B. Mark Smithers
  • Valérie Addor
  • Olle Ljungqvist
Scientific Review

Abstract

Introduction

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs provide a format for multidisciplinary care and has been shown to predictably improve short term outcomes associated with surgical procedures. Esophagectomy has historically been associated with significant levels of morbidity and mortality and as a result routine application and audit of ERAS guidelines specifically designed for esophageal resection has significant potential to improve outcomes associated with this complex procedure.

Methods

A team of international experts in the surgical management of esophageal cancer was assembled and the existing literature was identified and reviewed prior to the production of the guidelines. Well established procedure specific components of ERAS were reviewed and updated with changes relevant to esophagectomy. Procedure specific, operative and technical sections were produced utilizing the best current level of evidence. All sections were rated regarding the level of evidence and overall recommendation according to the evaluation (GRADE) system.

Results

Thirty-nine sections were ultimately produced and assessed for quality of evidence and recommendations. Some sections were completely new to ERAS programs due to the fact that esophagectomy is the first guideline with a thoracic component to the procedure.

Conclusions

The current ERAS society guidelines should be reviewed and applied in all centers looking to improve outcomes and quality associated with esophageal resection.

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Dr. Allum reports other from Nestle, and personal fees from Lilly, outside the submitted work. Dr. Ljungqvist reports other from Encare AB, personal fees from Nutricia, NL, during the conduct of the study; other from Encare AB (Sweden), personal fees and other from Nutricia (NL), outside the submitted work. Dr. Neal reports other from American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, other from Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, personal fees from Virginia Mason Medical Center, personal fees from Occasional expert medical consultation, grants from Washington State Society of Anesthesiologists, and personal fees from Wolters Kluwer, outside the submitted work. Dr. Scott reports personal fees from Merck, personal fees from Deltex, and personal fees from Edwards, outside the submitted work. The authors Drs. Low, De Manzoni, Ferri, Immanuel, Kuppusamy, Law, Lindblad, Maynard, Pramesh, Smithers, and Addor have nothing to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Kehlet H, Mogensen T (1999) Hospital stay of 2 days after open sigmoidectomy with a multimodal rehabilitation programme. Br J Surg 86:227–230Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fearon KC, Ljungqvist O, Von MM et al (2005) Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection. Clin Nutr 24:466–477Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ljungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon KC (2017) Enhanced recovery after surgery: a review. JAMA Surg 152:292–298Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lassen K, Soop M, Nygren J et al (2009) Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Group recommendations. Arch Surg 144:961–969Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mortensen K, Nilsson M, Slim K et al (2014) Consensus guidelines for enhanced recovery after gastrectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(R)) Society recommendations. Br J Surg 101:1209–1229Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Thorell A, MacCormick AD, Awad S et al (2016) Guidelines for perioperative care in bariatric surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations. World J Surg 40:2065–2083.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3492-3 Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Melloul E, Hubner M, Scott M et al (2016) Guidelines for perioperative care for liver surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations. World J Surg 40:2425–2440.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3700-1 Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nelson G, Altman AD, Nick A et al (2016) Guidelines for pre- and intra-operative care in gynecologic/oncology surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(R)) Society recommendations, part I. Gynecol Oncol 140:313–322Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nelson G, Altman AD, Nick A et al (2016) Guidelines for postoperative care in gynecologic/oncology surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(R)) Society recommendations, part II. Gynecol Oncol 140:323–332Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Low DE, Alderson D, Cecconello I et al (2015) International consensus on standardization of data collection for complications associated with esophagectomy: Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG). Ann Surg 262:286–294Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Finks JF, Osborne NH, Birkmeyer JD (2011) Trends in hospital volume and operative mortality for high-risk surgery. N Engl J Med 364:2128–2137Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Walters DM, McMurry TL, Isbell JM et al (2014) Understanding mortality as a quality indicator after esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 98:506–511Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE et al (2008) GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 336:924–926Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gillissen F, Ament SM, Maessen JM et al (2015) Sustainability of an enhanced recovery after surgery program (ERAS) in colonic surgery. World J Surg 39:526–533.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2744-3 Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hammond JS, Humphries S, Simson N et al (2014) Adherence to enhanced recovery after surgery protocols across a high-volume gastrointestinal surgical service. Dig Surg 31:117–122Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gustafsson UO, Hausel J, Thorell A et al (2011) Adherence to the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol and outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery. Arch Surg 146:571–577Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    ERAS Compliance Group (2015) The impact of enhanced recovery protocol compliance on elective colorectal cancer resection: results from an international registry. Ann Surg 261:1153–1159Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Martin TD, Lorenz T, Ferraro J et al (2016) Newly implemented enhanced recovery pathway positively impacts hospital length of stay. Surg Endosc 30:4019–4028Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W et al (2013) Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS((R))) Society recommendations. World J Surg 37:259–284.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1772-0 Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pecorelli N, Hershorn O, Baldini G et al (2017) Impact of adherence to care pathway interventions on recovery following bowel resection within an established enhanced recovery program. Surg Endosc 31:1760–1771Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lee L, Li C, Robert N et al (2013) Economic impact of an enhanced recovery pathway for oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 100:1326–1334Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Feldheiser A, Aziz O, Baldini G et al (2016) Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) for gastrointestinal surgery, part 2: consensus statement for anaesthesia practice. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 60:289–334Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Scott MJ, Baldini G, Fearon KC et al (2015) Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) for gastrointestinal surgery, part 1: pathophysiological considerations. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 59:1212–1231Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Porteous GH, Neal JM, Slee A et al (2015) A standardized anesthetic and surgical clinical pathway for esophageal resection: impact on length of stay and major outcomes. Reg Anesth Pain Med 40:139–149Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Findlay JM, Gillies RS, Millo J et al (2014) Enhanced recovery for esophagectomy: a systematic review and evidence-based guidelines. Ann Surg 259:413–431Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gemmill EH, Humes DJ, Catton JA (2015) Systematic review of enhanced recovery after gastro-oesophageal cancer surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 97:173–179Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Li C, Ferri LE, Mulder DS et al (2012) An enhanced recovery pathway decreases duration of stay after esophagectomy. Surgery 152:606–614Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Underwood TJ, Noble F, Madhusudan N et al (2017) The development, application and analysis of an enhanced recovery programme for major oesophagogastric resection. J Gastrointest Surg 21:614–621Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Markar SR, Karthikesalingam A, Low DE (2015) Enhanced recovery pathways lead to an improvement in postoperative outcomes following esophagectomy: systematic review and pooled analysis. Dis Esophagus 28:468–475Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bower MR, Martin RC (2009) Nutritional management during neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer. J Surg Oncol 100:82–87Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Weimann A, Braga M, Carli F et al (2017) ESPEN guideline: clinical nutrition in surgery. Clin Nutr 36:623–650Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ha L, Hauge T, Spenning AB et al (2010) Individual, nutritional support prevents undernutrition, increases muscle strength and improves QoL among elderly at nutritional risk hospitalized for acute stroke: a randomized, controlled trial. Clin Nutr 29:567–573Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ligthart-Melis GC, Weijs PJ, te Boveldt ND et al (2013) Dietician-delivered intensive nutritional support is associated with a decrease in severe postoperative complications after surgery in patients with esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus 26:587–593Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Odelli C, Burgess D, Bateman L et al (2005) Nutrition support improves patient outcomes, treatment tolerance and admission characteristics in oesophageal cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 17:639–645Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rufenacht U, Ruhlin M, Wegmann M et al (2010) Nutritional counseling improves quality of life and nutrient intake in hospitalized undernourished patients. Nutrition 26:53–60Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Okamoto Y, Okano K, Izuishi K et al (2009) Attenuation of the systemic inflammatory response and infectious complications after gastrectomy with preoperative oral arginine and omega-3 fatty acids supplemented immunonutrition. World J Surg 33:1815–1821.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0140-1 Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Heys SD, Walker LG, Smith I et al (1999) Enteral nutritional supplementation with key nutrients in patients with critical illness and cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials. Ann Surg 229:467–477Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zhang Y, Gu Y, Guo T et al (2012) Perioperative immunonutrition for gastrointestinal cancer: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Surg Oncol 21:e87–e95Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Mabvuure NT, Roman A, Khan OA (2013) Enteral immunonutrition versus standard enteral nutrition for patients undergoing oesophagogastric resection for cancer. Int J Surg 11:122–127Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sultan J, Griffin SM, Di Franco F et al (2012) Randomized clinical trial of omega-3 fatty acid-supplemented enteral nutrition versus standard enteral nutrition in patients undergoing oesophagogastric cancer surgery. Br J Surg 99:346–355Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ryan AM, Reynolds JV, Healy L et al (2009) Enteral nutrition enriched with eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) preserves lean body mass following esophageal cancer surgery: results of a double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 249:355–363Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Nagano T, Fujita H, Tanaka T et al (2013) Randomized controlled trial comparing antioxidant-enriched enteral nutrition with immune-enhancing enteral nutrition after esophagectomy for cancer: a pilot study. Surg Today 43:1240–1249Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Healy LA, Ryan A, Doyle SL et al (2017) Does prolonged enteral feeding with supplemental omega-3 fatty acids impact on recovery post-esophagectomy: results of a randomized double-blind trial. Ann Surg 266:720–728Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Taylor C, Munro AJ, Glynne-Jones R et al (2010) Multidisciplinary team working in cancer: what is the evidence? BMJ 340:c951Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Davies AR, Deans DA, Penman I et al (2006) The multidisciplinary team meeting improves staging accuracy and treatment selection for gastro-esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus 19:496–503Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Stephens MR, Lewis WG, Brewster AE et al (2006) Multidisciplinary team management is associated with improved outcomes after surgery for esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus 19:164–171Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Taplin SH, Weaver S, Salas E et al (2015) Reviewing cancer care team effectiveness. J Oncol Pract 11:239–246Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Blazeby JM, Wilson L, Metcalfe C et al (2006) Analysis of clinical decision-making in multi-disciplinary cancer teams. Ann Oncol 17:457–460Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Schmidt HM, Roberts JM, Bodnar AM et al (2015) Thoracic multidisciplinary tumor board routinely impacts therapeutic plans in patients with lung and esophageal cancer: a prospective cohort study. Ann Thorac Surg 99:1719–1724Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Fennell ML, Das IP, Clauser S et al (2010) The organization of multidisciplinary care teams: modeling internal and external influences on cancer care quality. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2010:72–80Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Smith TB, Stonell C, Purkayastha S et al (2009) Cardiopulmonary exercise testing as a risk assessment method in non cardio-pulmonary surgery: a systematic review. Anaesthesia 64:883–893Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Carli F, Silver JK, Feldman LS et al (2017) Surgical prehabilitation in patients with cancer: state-of-the-science and recommendations for future research from a panel of subject matter experts. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 28:49–64Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Carli F, Charlebois P, Stein B et al (2010) Randomized clinical trial of prehabilitation in colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 97:1187–1197Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Gillis C, Li C, Lee L et al (2014) Prehabilitation versus rehabilitation: a randomized control trial in patients undergoing colorectal resection for cancer. Anesthesiology 121:937–947Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Dunne DF, Jack S, Jones RP et al (2016) Randomized clinical trial of prehabilitation before planned liver resection. Br J Surg 103:504–512Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Le Roy B, Pereira B, Bouteloup C et al (2016) Effect of prehabilitation in gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma: study protocol of a multicentric, randomised, control trial-the PREHAB study. BMJ Open 6:e012876Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Ikebe M, Morita M, Yamamoto M et al (2016) Neoadjuvant therapy for advanced esophageal cancer: the impact on surgical management. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 64:386–394Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Medical Research Council Oesophageal Cancer Working Group (2002) Surgical resection with or without preoperative chemotherapy in oesophageal cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 359:1727–1733Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP et al (2006) Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med 355:11–20Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Kelsen DP, Ginsberg R, Pajak TF et al (1998) Chemotherapy followed by surgery compared with surgery alone for localized esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med 339:1979–1984Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Shapiro J, van Lanschot JJ, Hulshof MC et al (2015) Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS): long-term results of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 16:1090–1098Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Shapiro J, Van HP, Lingsma HF et al (2014) Prolonged time to surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy increases histopathological response without affecting survival in patients with esophageal or junctional cancer. Ann Surg 260:807–813Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Lin G, Han SY, Xu YP et al (2016) Increasing the interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery in esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis of published studies. Dis Esophagus 29:1107–1114Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW et al (2012) Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 379:1887–1892Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Maas KW, Cuesta MA, van Berge Henegouwen MI et al (2015) Quality of life and late complications after minimally invasive compared to open esophagectomy: results of a randomized trial. World J Surg 39:1986–1993.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3100-y Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Nagpal K, Ahmed K, Vats A et al (2010) Is minimally invasive surgery beneficial in the management of esophageal cancer? A meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 24:1621–1629Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Guo W, Ma X, Yang S et al (2016) Combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy: a meta-analysis of outcomes. Surg Endosc 30:3873–3881Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Sgourakis G, Gockel I, Radtke A et al (2010) Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy: meta-analysis of outcomes. Dig Dis Sci 55:3031–3040Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Dantoc M, Cox MR, Eslick GD (2012) Evidence to support the use of minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis. Arch Surg 147:768–776Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Seesing MFJ, Gisbertz SS, Goense L et al (2017) A propensity score matched analysis of open versus minimally invasive transthoracic esophagectomy in the Netherlands. Ann Surg 266:839–846Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    ESMO 2017 Press Release: MIRO Trial: 3-year outcomes favour laparoscopic surgery for oesophageal cancer. Sept. 5, 2017. http://www.esmo.org/Press-Office/Press-Releases/MIRO-Trial-3-year-Outcomes-Favour-Laparoscopic-Surgery-for-Oesophageal-Cancer. European Society for Medical Oncology. Accessed 16 Feb 2018
  72. 72.
    Urschel JD (2001) Does the interponat affect outcome after esophagectomy for cancer? Dis Esophagus 14:124–130Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    DeMeester SR (2001) Colon interposition following esophagectomy. Dis Esophagus 14:169–172Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Gust L, Ouattara M, Coosemans W et al (2016) European perspective in thoracic surgery-eso-coloplasty: when and how? J Thorac Dis 8:S387–S398Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Watanabe M, Mine S, Nishida K et al (2016) Reconstruction after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer patients with a history of gastrectomy. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 64:457–463Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Akkerman RD, Haverkamp L, van Hillegersberg R et al (2014) Surgical techniques to prevent delayed gastric emptying after esophagectomy with gastric interposition: a systematic review. Ann Thorac Surg 98:1512–1519Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Urschel JD, Blewett CJ, Young JE et al (2002) Pyloric drainage (pyloroplasty) or no drainage in gastric reconstruction after esophagectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dig Surg 19:160–164Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS, Canon CL et al (2009) Is botulinum toxin injection of the pylorus during Ivor Lewis [corrected] esophagogastrectomy the optimal drainage strategy? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 137:565–572Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Oezcelik A, DeMeester SR, Hindoyan K et al (2011) Circular stapled pyloroplasty: a fast and effective technique for pyloric disruption during esophagectomy with gastric pull-up. Dis Esophagus 24:423–429Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Hiranyatheb P, Osugi H (2015) Radical lymphadenectomy in esophageal cancer: from the past to the present. Dis Esophagus 28:68–77Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Altorki N, Kent M, Ferrara C et al (2002) Three-field lymph node dissection for squamous cell and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. Ann Surg 236:177–183Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Choi HK, Law S, Chu KM et al (1998) The value of neck drain in esophageal surgery: a randomized trial. Dis Esophagus 11:40–42Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Tang H, Xue L, Hong J et al (2012) A method for early diagnosis and treatment of intrathoracic esophageal anastomotic leakage: prophylactic placement of a drainage tube adjacent to the anastomosis. J Gastrointest Surg 16:722–727Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Perry Y, Towe CW, Kwong J et al (2015) Serial drain amylase can accurately detect anastomotic leak after esophagectomy and may facilitate early discharge. Ann Thorac Surg 100:2041–2046Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Berkelmans GH, Kouwenhoven EA, Smeets BJ et al (2015) Diagnostic value of drain amylase for detecting intrathoracic leakage after esophagectomy. World J Gastroenterol 21:9118–9125Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Weijs TJ, Kumagai K, Berkelmans GH et al (2017) Nasogastric decompression following esophagectomy: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Dis Esophagus 30:1–8Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Mistry RC, Vijayabhaskar R, Karimundackal G et al (2012) Effect of short-term vs prolonged nasogastric decompression on major postesophagectomy complications: a parallel-group, randomized trial. Arch Surg 147:747–751Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Shackcloth MJ, McCarron E, Kendall J et al (2006) Randomized clinical trial to determine the effect of nasogastric drainage on tracheal acid aspiration following oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 93:547–552Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Refai M, Brunelli A, Salati M et al (2012) The impact of chest tube removal on pain and pulmonary function after pulmonary resection. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 41:820–822Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Lagarde SM, Omloo JM, Ubbink DT et al (2007) Predictive factors associated with prolonged chest drain production after esophagectomy. Dis Esophagus 20:24–28Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Hessami MA, Najafi F, Hatami S (2009) Volume threshold for chest tube removal: a randomized controlled trial. J Inj Violence Res 1:33–36Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Younes RN, Gross JL, Aguiar S et al (2002) When to remove a chest tube? A randomized study with subsequent prospective consecutive validation. J Am Coll Surg 195:658–662Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS (2008) Results of a prospective algorithm to remove chest tubes after pulmonary resection with high output. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 135:269–273Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Johansson J, Lindberg CG, Johnsson F et al (1998) Active or passive chest drainage after oesophagectomy in 101 patients: a prospective randomized study. Br J Surg 85:1143–1146Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Alex J, Ansari J, Bahalkar P et al (2003) Comparison of the immediate postoperative outcome of using the conventional two drains versus a single drain after lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 76:1046–1049Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Gomez-Caro A, Roca MJ, Torres J et al (2006) Successful use of a single chest drain postlobectomy instead of two classical drains: a randomized study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 29:562–566Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Fong YM, Marano MA, Barber A et al (1989) Total parenteral nutrition and bowel rest modify the metabolic response to endotoxin in humans. Ann Surg 210:449–456Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Mazaki T, Ebisawa K (2008) Enteral versus parenteral nutrition after gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in the English literature. J Gastrointest Surg 12:739–755Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Seike J, Tangoku A, Yuasa Y et al (2011) The effect of nutritional support on the immune function in the acute postoperative period after esophageal cancer surgery: total parenteral nutrition versus enteral nutrition. J Med Invest 58:75–80Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Aiko S, Yoshizumi Y, Sugiura Y et al (2001) Beneficial effects of immediate enteral nutrition after esophageal cancer surgery. Surg Today 31:971–978Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Baigrie RJ, Devitt PG, Watkin DS (1996) Enteral versus parenteral nutrition after oesophagogastric surgery: a prospective randomized comparison. Aust N Z J Surg 66:668–670Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Myers JG, Page CP, Stewart RM et al (1995) Complications of needle catheter jejunostomy in 2,022 consecutive applications. Am J Surg 170:547–550Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    Han-Geurts IJ, Hop WC, Verhoef C et al (2007) Randomized clinical trial comparing feeding jejunostomy with nasoduodenal tube placement in patients undergoing oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 94:31–35Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Weijs TJ, Berkelmans GH, Nieuwenhuijzen GA et al (2015) Routes for early enteral nutrition after esophagectomy: a systematic review. Clin Nutr 34:1–6Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    Holte K, Foss NB, Svensen C et al (2004) Epidural anesthesia, hypotension, and changes in intravascular volume. Anesthesiology 100:281–286Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Casado D, Lopez F, Marti R (2010) Perioperative fluid management and major respiratory complications in patients undergoing esophagectomy. Dis Esophagus 23:523–528Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    Wei S, Tian J, Song X et al (2008) Association of perioperative fluid balance and adverse surgical outcomes in esophageal cancer and esophagogastric junction cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 86:266–272Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Abbas SM, Hill AG (2008) Systematic review of the literature for the use of oesophageal Doppler monitor for fluid replacement in major abdominal surgery. Anaesthesia 63:44–51Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Rahbari NN, Zimmermann JB, Schmidt T et al (2009) Meta-analysis of standard, restrictive and supplemental fluid administration in colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 96:331–341Google Scholar
  110. 110.
    Rollins KE, Lobo DN (2016) Intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy in elective major abdominal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg 263:465–476Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    Varadhan KK, Lobo DN (2010) A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of intravenous fluid therapy in major elective open abdominal surgery: getting the balance right. Proc Nutr Soc 69:488–498Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    Carney A, Dickinson M (2015) Anesthesia for esophagectomy. Anesthesiol Clin 33:143–163Google Scholar
  113. 113.
    Bundgaard-Nielsen M, Secher NH, Kehlet H (2009) ‘Liberal’ vs. ‘restrictive’ perioperative fluid therapy: a critical assessment of the evidence. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 53:843–851Google Scholar
  114. 114.
    Puckett JR, Pickering JW, Palmer SC et al (2017) Low versus standard urine output targets in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery: a randomized noninferiority trial. Ann Surg 265:874–881Google Scholar
  115. 115.
    Shaw AD, Bagshaw SM, Goldstein SL et al (2012) Major complications, mortality, and resource utilization after open abdominal surgery: 0.9% saline compared to Plasma-Lyte. Ann Surg 255:821–829Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    Senagore AJ, Emery T, Luchtefeld M et al (2009) Fluid management for laparoscopic colectomy: a prospective, randomized assessment of goal-directed administration of balanced salt solution or hetastarch coupled with an enhanced recovery program. Dis Colon Rectum 52:1935–1940Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    Beck-Schimmer B, Bonvini JM, Braun J et al (2016) Which anesthesia regimen is best to reduce morbidity and mortality in lung surgery? A multicenter randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology 125:313–321Google Scholar
  118. 118.
    Punjasawadwong Y, Boonjeungmonkol N, Phongchiewboon A (2007) Bispectral index for improving anaesthetic delivery and postoperative recovery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD003843Google Scholar
  119. 119.
    Brull SJ, Murphy GS (2010) Residual neuromuscular block: lessons unlearned. Part II: methods to reduce the risk of residual weakness. Anesth Analg 111:129–140Google Scholar
  120. 120.
    Guay J, Ochroch EA (2015) Intraoperative use of low volume ventilation to decrease postoperative mortality, mechanical ventilation, lengths of stay and lung injury in patients without acute lung injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD011151Google Scholar
  121. 121.
    Guldner A, Kiss T, Serpa NA et al (2015) Intraoperative protective mechanical ventilation for prevention of postoperative pulmonary complications: a comprehensive review of the role of tidal volume, positive end-expiratory pressure, and lung recruitment maneuvers. Anesthesiology 123:692–713Google Scholar
  122. 122.
    Serpa Neto A, Hemmes SN, Barbas CS et al (2015) Protective versus conventional ventilation for surgery: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis. Anesthesiology 123:66–78Google Scholar
  123. 123.
    Michelet P, D’Journo XB, Roch A et al (2006) Protective ventilation influences systemic inflammation after esophagectomy: a randomized controlled study. Anesthesiology 105:911–919Google Scholar
  124. 124.
    Verhage RJ, Boone J, Rijkers GT et al (2014) Reduced local immune response with continuous positive airway pressure during one-lung ventilation for oesophagectomy. Br J Anaesth 112:920–928Google Scholar
  125. 125.
    Lohser J, Slinger P (2015) Lung injury after one-lung ventilation: a review of the pathophysiologic mechanisms affecting the ventilated and the collapsed lung. Anesth Analg 121:302–318Google Scholar
  126. 126.
    Amato MB, Meade MO, Slutsky AS et al (2015) Driving pressure and survival in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 372:747–755Google Scholar
  127. 127.
    Neto AS, Hemmes SN, Barbas CS et al (2016) Association between driving pressure and development of postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation for general anaesthesia: a meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Respir Med 4:272–280Google Scholar
  128. 128.
    Robertson SA, Skipworth RJ, Clarke DL et al (2006) Ventilatory and intensive care requirements following oesophageal resection. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 88:354–357Google Scholar
  129. 129.
    Chandrashekar MV, Irving M, Wayman J et al (2003) Immediate extubation and epidural analgesia allow safe management in a high-dependency unit after two-stage oesophagectomy. Results of eight years of experience in a specialized upper gastrointestinal unit in a district general hospital. Br J Anaesth 90:474–479Google Scholar
  130. 130.
    Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS, Bass CS et al (2004) Fast tracking after Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy. Chest 126:1187–1194Google Scholar
  131. 131.
    Li C, Ferri LE, Mulder DS et al (2012) An enhanced recovery pathway decreases duration of stay after esophagectomy. Surgery 152:606–614Google Scholar
  132. 132.
    Cao S, Zhao G, Cui J et al (2013) Fast-track rehabilitation program and conventional care after esophagectomy: a retrospective controlled cohort study. Support Care Cancer 21:707–714Google Scholar
  133. 133.
    Wunsch H, Gershengorn HB, Cooke CR et al (2016) Use of intensive care services for medicare beneficiaries undergoing major surgical procedures. Anesthesiology 124:899–907Google Scholar
  134. 134.
    Flisberg P, Tornebrandt K, Walther B et al (2001) Pain relief after esophagectomy: thoracic epidural analgesia is better than parenteral opioids. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 15:282–287Google Scholar
  135. 135.
    Senturk M, Ozcan PE, Talu GK et al (2002) The effects of three different analgesia techniques on long-term postthoracotomy pain. Anesth Analg 94:11–15Google Scholar
  136. 136.
    Richards ER, Kabir SI, McNaught CE et al (2013) Effect of thoracic epidural anaesthesia on splanchnic blood flow. Br J Surg 100:316–321Google Scholar
  137. 137.
    Lazar G, Kaszaki J, Abraham S et al (2003) Thoracic epidural anesthesia improves the gastric microcirculation during experimental gastric tube formation. Surgery 134:799–805Google Scholar
  138. 138.
    Theodorou D, Drimousis PG, Larentzakis A et al (2008) The effects of vasopressors on perfusion of gastric graft after esophagectomy: an experimental study. J Gastrointest Surg 12:1497–1501Google Scholar
  139. 139.
    Pathak D, Pennefather SH, Russell GN et al (2013) Phenylephrine infusion improves blood flow to the stomach during oesophagectomy in the presence of a thoracic epidural analgesia. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 44:130–133Google Scholar
  140. 140.
    Al-Rawi OY, Pennefather SH, Page RD et al (2008) The effect of thoracic epidural bupivacaine and an intravenous adrenaline infusion on gastric tube blood flow during esophagectomy. Anesth Analg 106:884–887Google Scholar
  141. 141.
    Davies RG, Myles PS, Graham JM (2006) A comparison of the analgesic efficacy and side-effects of paravertebral vs epidural blockade for thoracotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Br J Anaesth 96:418–426Google Scholar
  142. 142.
    Ding X, Jin S, Niu X et al (2014) A comparison of the analgesia efficacy and side effects of paravertebral compared with epidural blockade for thoracotomy: an updated meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 9:e96233Google Scholar
  143. 143.
    Baidya DK, Khanna P, Maitra S (2014) Analgesic efficacy and safety of thoracic paravertebral and epidural analgesia for thoracic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 18:626–635Google Scholar
  144. 144.
    Schmidt PC, Ruchelli G, Mackey SC et al (2014) Perioperative Gabapentinoids: choice of agent, dose, timing, and effects on chronic postsurgical pain. Surv Anesthesiol 58:96–97Google Scholar
  145. 145.
    Laskowski K, Stirling A, McKay WP et al (2011) A systematic review of intravenous ketamine for postoperative analgesia. Can J Anaesth 58:911–923Google Scholar
  146. 146.
    De Oliveira GSJ, Castro-Alves LJ, Khan JH et al (2013) Perioperative systemic magnesium to minimize postoperative pain: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Anesthesiology 119:178–190Google Scholar
  147. 147.
    Ryan AM, Rowley SP, Healy LA et al (2006) Post-oesophagectomy early enteral nutrition via a needle catheter jejunostomy: 8-year experience at a specialist unit. Clin Nutr 25:386–393Google Scholar
  148. 148.
    Xiao-Bo Y, Qiang L, Xiong Q et al (2014) Efficacy of early postoperative enteral nutrition in supporting patients after esophagectomy. Minerva Chir 69:37–46Google Scholar
  149. 149.
    Mazaki T, Ebisawa K (2008) Enteral versus parenteral nutrition after gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in the English literature. J Gastrointest Surg 12:739–755Google Scholar
  150. 150.
    Fujita T, Daiko H, Nishimura M (2012) Early enteral nutrition reduces the rate of life-threatening complications after thoracic esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer. Eur Surg Res 48:79–84Google Scholar
  151. 151.
    Convertino VA (1997) Cardiovascular consequences of bed rest: effect on maximal oxygen uptake. Med Sci Sports Exerc 29:191–196Google Scholar
  152. 152.
    Pashikanti L, Von Ah D (2012) Impact of early mobilization protocol on the medical-surgical inpatient population: an integrated review of literature. Clin Nurse Spec 26:87–94Google Scholar
  153. 153.
    Kehlet H, Wilmore DW (2002) Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg 183:630–641Google Scholar
  154. 154.
    Brower RG (2009) Consequences of bed rest. Crit Care Med 37:S422–S428Google Scholar
  155. 155.
    Lauder CI, Marlow NE, Maddern GJ et al (2010) Systematic review of the impact of volume of oesophagectomy on patient outcome. ANZ J Surg 80:317–323Google Scholar
  156. 156.
    Markar SR, Karthikesalingam A, Thrumurthy S et al (2012) Volume-outcome relationship in surgery for esophageal malignancy: systematic review and meta-analysis 2000–2011. J Gastrointest Surg 16:1055–1063Google Scholar
  157. 157.
    Schmidt HM, El Lakis MA, Markar SR et al (2016) Accelerated recovery within standardized recovery pathways after esophagectomy: a prospective cohort study assessing the effects of early discharge on outcomes, readmissions, patient satisfaction, and costs. Ann Thorac Surg 102:931–939Google Scholar
  158. 158.
    Pearse RM, Moreno RP, Bauer P et al (2012) Mortality after surgery in Europe: a 7 day cohort study. Lancet 380:1059–1065Google Scholar
  159. 159.
    Gustafsson UO, Hausel J, Thorell A et al (2011) Adherence to the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol and outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery. Arch Surg 146:571–577Google Scholar
  160. 160.
    Nelson G, Kiyang LN, Crumley ET et al (2016) Implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) across a provincial healthcare system: the ERAS Alberta colorectal surgery experience. World J Surg 40:1092–1103.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3472-7 Google Scholar
  161. 161.
    Thanh NX, Chuck AW, Wasylak T et al (2016) An economic evaluation of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) multisite implementation program for colorectal surgery in Alberta. Can J Surg 59:415–421Google Scholar
  162. 162.
    Gustafsson UO, Oppelstrup H, Thorell A et al (2016) Adherence to the ERAS protocol is associated with 5-year survival after colorectal cancer surgery: a retrospective cohort study. World J Surg 40:1741–1747.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3460-y Google Scholar
  163. 163.
    Roulin D, Donadini A, Gander S et al (2013) Cost-effectiveness of the implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol for colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 100:1108–1114Google Scholar
  164. 164.
    Stergiopoulou A, Birbas K, Katostaras T et al (2007) The effect of interactive multimedia on preoperative knowledge and postoperative recovery of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods Inf Med 46:406–409Google Scholar
  165. 165.
    McGill University Health Centre Patient Education Office. MUHC patient education guide: esophageal cancer. http://muhcguides.com/module/esophageal. Accessed 13 June 2017
  166. 166.
    Edward GM, Naald N, Oort FJ et al (2011) Information gain in patients using a multimedia website with tailored information on anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 106:319–324Google Scholar
  167. 167.
    Sobanko JF, Da SD, Chiesa Fuxench ZC et al (2017) Preoperative telephone consultation does not decrease patient anxiety before Mohs micrographic surgery. J Am Acad Dermatol 76:519–526Google Scholar
  168. 168.
    Yang CL, Tan YH, Jiang XX et al (2012) Pre-operative education and counselling are associated with reduced anxiety symptoms following carotid endarterectomy: a randomized and open-label study. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 11:284–288Google Scholar
  169. 169.
    Mantziari S, Hubner M, Demartines N et al (2014) Impact of preoperative risk factors on morbidity after esophagectomy: is there room for improvement? World J Surg 38:2882–2890.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2686-9 Google Scholar
  170. 170.
    Lindstrom D, Sadr AO, Wladis A et al (2008) Effects of a perioperative smoking cessation intervention on postoperative complications: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 248:739–745Google Scholar
  171. 171.
    Thomsen T, Villebro N, Moller AM (2010) Interventions for preoperative smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD002294Google Scholar
  172. 172.
    Yoshida N, Baba Y, Hiyoshi Y et al (2016) Duration of smoking cessation and postoperative morbidity after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: how long should patients stop smoking before surgery? World J Surg 40:142–147.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3236-9 Google Scholar
  173. 173.
    Tonnesen H, Kehlet H (1999) Preoperative alcoholism and postoperative morbidity. Br J Surg 86:869–874Google Scholar
  174. 174.
    Tonnesen H, Rosenberg J, Nielsen HJ et al (1999) Effect of preoperative abstinence on poor postoperative outcome in alcohol misusers: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 318:1311–1316Google Scholar
  175. 175.
    Lee SM, Landry J, Jones PM et al (2013) The effectiveness of a perioperative smoking cessation program: a randomized clinical trial. Anesth Analg 117:605–613Google Scholar
  176. 176.
    Older P, Hall A (2005) Preoperative evaluation of cardiac risk. Br J Hosp Med 66:452–457Google Scholar
  177. 177.
    Ross RM (2003) ATS/ACCP statement on cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 167:1451Google Scholar
  178. 178.
    Older P, Hall A, Hader R (1999) Cardiopulmonary exercise testing as a screening test for perioperative management of major surgery in the elderly. Chest 116:355–362Google Scholar
  179. 179.
    Moyes LH, McCaffer CJ, Carter RC et al (2013) Cardiopulmonary exercise testing as a predictor of complications in oesophagogastric cancer surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 95:125–130Google Scholar
  180. 180.
    Forshaw MJ, Strauss DC, Davies AR et al (2008) Is cardiopulmonary exercise testing a useful test before esophagectomy? Ann Thorac Surg 85:294–299Google Scholar
  181. 181.
    Hennis PJ, Meale PM, Grocott MP (2011) Cardiopulmonary exercise testing for the evaluation of perioperative risk in non-cardiopulmonary surgery. Postgrad Med J 87:550–557Google Scholar
  182. 182.
    Sinclair R, Navidi M, Griffin SM et al (2016) The impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on cardiopulmonary physical fitness in gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 98:396–400Google Scholar
  183. 183.
    Holte K, Nielsen KG, Madsen JL et al (2004) Physiologic effects of bowel preparation. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1397–1402Google Scholar
  184. 184.
    Guenaga KF, Matos D, Wille-Jorgensen P (2011) Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD001544Google Scholar
  185. 185.
    Cao F, Li J, Li F (2012) Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery: updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 27:803–810Google Scholar
  186. 186.
    Brady M, Kinn S, Stuart P (2003) Preoperative fasting for adults to prevent perioperative complications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD004423Google Scholar
  187. 187.
    Ljungqvist O, Nygren J, Thorell A (2002) Modulation of post-operative insulin resistance by pre-operative carbohydrate loading. Proc Nutr Soc 61:329–336Google Scholar
  188. 188.
    Awad S, Varadhan KK, Ljungqvist O et al (2013) A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials on preoperative oral carbohydrate treatment in elective surgery. Clin Nutr 32:34–44Google Scholar
  189. 189.
    Yilmaz N, Cekmen N, Bilgin F et al (2013) Preoperative carbohydrate nutrition reduces postoperative nausea and vomiting compared to preoperative fasting. J Res Med Sci 18:827–832Google Scholar
  190. 190.
    Smith MD, McCall J, Plank L et al. (2014) Preoperative carbohydrate treatment for enhancing recovery after elective surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD009161Google Scholar
  191. 191.
    Toms L, McQuay HJ, Derry S et al. (2008) Single dose oral paracetamol (acetaminophen) for postoperative pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD004602Google Scholar
  192. 192.
    Moiniche S, Kehlet H, Dahl JB (2002) A qualitative and quantitative systematic review of preemptive analgesia for postoperative pain relief: the role of timing of analgesia. Anesthesiology 96:725–741Google Scholar
  193. 193.
    Caumo W, Hidalgo MP, Schmidt AP et al (2002) Effect of pre-operative anxiolysis on postoperative pain response in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy. Anaesthesia 57:740–746Google Scholar
  194. 194.
    Walker KJ, Smith AF (2009) Premedication for anxiety in adult day surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD002192Google Scholar
  195. 195.
    Gan TJ, Diemunsch P, Habib AS et al (2014) Consensus guidelines for the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg 118:85–113Google Scholar
  196. 196.
    Apfel CC, Laara E, Koivuranta M et al (1999) A simplified risk score for predicting postoperative nausea and vomiting: conclusions from cross-validations between two centers. Anesthesiology 91:693–700Google Scholar
  197. 197.
    Apfel CC, Korttila K, Abdalla M et al (2004) A factorial trial of six interventions for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. N Engl J Med 350:2441–2451Google Scholar
  198. 198.
    Habib AS, El-Moalem HE, Gan TJ (2004) The efficacy of the 5-HT3 receptor antagonists combined with droperidol for PONV prophylaxis is similar to their combination with dexamethasone: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Can J Anaesth 51:311–319Google Scholar
  199. 199.
    Kazemi-Kjellberg F, Henzi I, Tramer MR (2001) Treatment of established postoperative nausea and vomiting: a quantitative systematic review. BMC Anesthesiol 1:2Google Scholar
  200. 200.
    Devereaux PJ, Yang H, Yusuf S et al (2008) Effects of extended-release metoprolol succinate in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery (POISE trial): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 371:1839–1847Google Scholar
  201. 201.
    Bouri S, Shun-Shin MJ, Cole GD et al (2014) Meta-analysis of secure randomised controlled trials of beta-blockade to prevent perioperative death in non-cardiac surgery. Heart 100:456–464Google Scholar
  202. 202.
    London MJ, Hur K, Schwartz GG et al (2013) Association of perioperative beta-blockade with mortality and cardiovascular morbidity following major noncardiac surgery. JAMA 309:1704–1713Google Scholar
  203. 203.
    Friedell ML, Van Way CW, Freyberg RW et al (2015) β-Blockade and operative mortality in noncardiac surgery: harmful or helpful? JAMA Surg 150:658–663Google Scholar
  204. 204.
    Wijeysundera DN, Duncan D, Nkonde-Price C et al (2014) Perioperative beta blockade in noncardiac surgery: a systematic review for the 2014 ACC/AHA guideline on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and management of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 64:2406–2425Google Scholar
  205. 205.
    Blessberger H, Kammler J, Domanovits H et al. (2014) Perioperative beta-blockers for preventing surgery-related mortality and morbidity. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD004476Google Scholar
  206. 206.
    Low DE, Kuppusamy MK, Alderson D et al (2017) Benchmarking complications associated with esophagectomy. Ann Surg.  https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000002611 Google Scholar
  207. 207.
    Tisdale JE, Jaynes H, Watson M et al (2017) Intravenous Amiodarone for prevention of atrial fibrillation following esophagectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 69:545Google Scholar
  208. 208.
    Tisdale JE, Wroblewski HA, Wall DS et al (2010) A randomized, controlled study of amiodarone for prevention of atrial fibrillation after transthoracic esophagectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 140:45–51Google Scholar
  209. 209.
    Mantziari S, Gronnier C, Pasquer A et al (2016) Incidence and risk factors related to symptomatic venous thromboembolic events after esophagectomy for cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 102:979–984Google Scholar
  210. 210.
    Kakkos SK, Caprini JA, Geroulakos G et al. (2008) Combined intermittent pneumatic leg compression and pharmacological prophylaxis for prevention of venous thromboembolism in high-risk patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD005258Google Scholar
  211. 211.
    Morris RJ, Woodcock JP (2010) Intermittent pneumatic compression or graduated compression stockings for deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis? A systematic review of direct clinical comparisons. Ann Surg 251:393–396Google Scholar
  212. 212.
    Akl EA, Labedi N, Terrenato I et al. (2011) Low molecular weight heparin versus unfractionated heparin for perioperative thromboprophylaxis in patients with cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD009447Google Scholar
  213. 213.
    Song JQ, Xuan LZ, Wu W et al (2015) Low molecular weight heparin once versus twice for thromboprophylaxis following esophagectomy: a randomised, double-blind and placebo-controlled trial. J Thorac Dis 7:1158–1164Google Scholar
  214. 214.
    Rasmussen MS, Jorgensen LN, Wille-Jorgensen P (2009) Prolonged thromboprophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin for abdominal or pelvic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD004318Google Scholar
  215. 215.
    Horlocker TT (2017) New updated anticoagulation publication. Unknown (in press) Google Scholar
  216. 216.
    Kurz A, Sessler DI, Lenhardt R (1996) Perioperative normothermia to reduce the incidence of surgical-wound infection and shorten hospitalization. Study of Wound Infection and Temperature Group. N Engl J Med 334:1209–1215Google Scholar
  217. 217.
    Scott EM, Buckland R (2006) A systematic review of intraoperative warming to prevent postoperative complications. AORN J 83:1090–1113Google Scholar
  218. 218.
    Rajagopalan S, Mascha E, Na J et al (2008) The effects of mild perioperative hypothermia on blood loss and transfusion requirement. Anesthesiology 108:71–77Google Scholar
  219. 219.
    Yamasaki H, Tanaka K, Funai Y et al (2014) The impact of intraoperative hypothermia on early postoperative adverse events after radical esophagectomy for cancer: a retrospective cohort study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 28:943–947Google Scholar
  220. 220.
    Perez-Protto S, Sessler DI, Reynolds LF et al (2010) Circulating-water garment or the combination of a circulating-water mattress and forced-air cover to maintain core temperature during major upper-abdominal surgery. Br J Anaesth 105:466–470Google Scholar
  221. 221.
    Galvao CM, Liang Y, Clark AM (2010) Effectiveness of cutaneous warming systems on temperature control: meta-analysis. J Adv Nurs 66:1196–1206Google Scholar
  222. 222.
    Fujita T, Okada N, Kanamori J et al (2017) Thermogenesis induced by amino acid administration prevents intraoperative hypothermia and reduces postoperative infectious complications after thoracoscopic esophagectomy. Dis Esophagus 30:1–7Google Scholar
  223. 223.
    Hruska LA, Smith JM, Hendy MP et al (2005) Continuous insulin infusion reduces infectious complications in diabetics following coronary surgery. J Card Surg 20:403–407Google Scholar
  224. 224.
    Shah BR, Hux JE (2003) Quantifying the risk of infectious diseases for people with diabetes. Diabetes Care 26:510–513Google Scholar
  225. 225.
    Shilling AM, Raphael J (2008) Diabetes, hyperglycemia, and infections. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 22:519–535Google Scholar
  226. 226.
    van den Berghe G, Wouters P, Weekers F et al (2001) Intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med 345:1359–1367Google Scholar
  227. 227.
    van den Berghe G, Schetz M, Vlasselaers D et al (2009) Clinical review: intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients: NICE-SUGAR or Leuven blood glucose target? J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94:3163–3170Google Scholar
  228. 228.
    Kehlet H (2008) Postoperative ileus: an update on preventive techniques. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol 5:552–558Google Scholar
  229. 229.
    Traut U, Brugger L, Kunz R et al. (2008) Systemic prokinetic pharmacologic treatment for postoperative adynamic ileus following abdominal surgery in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD004930Google Scholar
  230. 230.
    Short V, Herbert G, Perry R et al. (2015) Chewing gum for postoperative recovery of gastrointestinal function. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD006506Google Scholar
  231. 231.
    Bundgaard-Nielsen M, Holte K, Secher NH et al (2007) Monitoring of peri-operative fluid administration by individualized goal-directed therapy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 51:331–340Google Scholar
  232. 232.
    Jorgensen H, Wetterslev J, Moiniche S et al. (2000) Epidural local anaesthetics versus opioid-based analgesic regimens on postoperative gastrointestinal paralysis, PONV and pain after abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD001893Google Scholar
  233. 233.
    Bragg D, El-Sharkawy AM, Psaltis E et al (2015) Postoperative ileus: recent developments in pathophysiology and management. Clin Nutr 34:367–376Google Scholar
  234. 234.
    Tripepi-Bova KA, Sun Z, Mason D et al (2013) Early removal of urinary catheters in patients with thoracic epidural catheters. J Nurs Care Qual 28:340–344Google Scholar
  235. 235.
    Hu Y, Craig SJ, Rowlingson JC et al (2014) Early removal of urinary catheter after surgery requiring thoracic epidural: a prospective trial. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 28:1302–1306Google Scholar
  236. 236.
    Zaouter C, Kaneva P, Carli F (2009) Less urinary tract infection by earlier removal of bladder catheter in surgical patients receiving thoracic epidural analgesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med 34:542–548Google Scholar
  237. 237.
    Allen MS, Blackmon SH, Nichols FC III et al (2016) Optimal timing of urinary catheter removal after thoracic operations: a randomized controlled study. Ann Thorac Surg 102:925–930Google Scholar
  238. 238.
    McPhail MJ, Abu-Hilal M, Johnson CD (2006) A meta-analysis comparing suprapubic and transurethral catheterization for bladder drainage after abdominal surgery. Br J Surg 93:1038–1044Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Donald E. Low
    • 1
    Email author
  • William Allum
    • 2
  • Giovanni De Manzoni
    • 3
  • Lorenzo Ferri
    • 4
  • Arul Immanuel
    • 5
  • MadhanKumar Kuppusamy
    • 1
  • Simon Law
    • 6
  • Mats Lindblad
    • 7
  • Nick Maynard
    • 8
  • Joseph Neal
    • 1
  • C. S. Pramesh
    • 9
  • Mike Scott
    • 10
  • B. Mark Smithers
    • 11
  • Valérie Addor
    • 12
  • Olle Ljungqvist
    • 13
  1. 1.Head of Thoracic Surgery and Thoracic Oncology, C6-GSVirginia Mason Medical CenterSeattleUSA
  2. 2.The Royal Marsden HospitalsLondonUK
  3. 3.University of VeronaVeronaItaly
  4. 4.McGill University Health CentreMontrealCanada
  5. 5.Newcastle upon Tyne HospitalsNewcastle upon TyneUK
  6. 6.Queen Mary HospitalHong KongChina
  7. 7.Karolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
  8. 8.Oxford Radcliffe HospitalsOxfordUK
  9. 9.Tata Memorial CentreMumbaiIndia
  10. 10.Virginia Commonwealth University Health SystemRichmondUSA
  11. 11.Princess Alexandra HospitalThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia
  12. 12.Centre Hospitalier Universitaire VaudoisLausanneSwitzerland
  13. 13.Örebro UniversityÖrebroSweden

Personalised recommendations