Advertisement

World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 43, Issue 1, pp 125–126 | Cite as

Ten Years and Counting: Sustaining Effectiveness of the Surgical Safety Checklist Through Ongoing Implementation Efforts

  • Ian Solsky
  • Alex B. HaynesEmail author
Invited Commentary

In their study, entitled “Implementation of the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist correlates to reduced surgical mortality and length of hospital admission in a high income country,” authors de Jager et al. contribute to the growing evidence that surgical checklists can save lives and prevent complications around the world, this time in a tertiary care center in Australia [1]. Beyond its heretofore unstudied setting, what is also noteworthy about this study is its finding that the checklist’s positive impact on mortality reached significance in the long-term (2–3 years post-implementation), highlighting the behavioral and cultural changes the checklist is thought to engender. As the Surgical Safety Checklist celebrates 10 years of use in operating rooms around the world, its staying power is evident; however, there is still much to learn about how we can sustain the effectiveness of the checklist over time.

Several studies, including this one, have examined the impact...

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors report no proprietary or commercial interest in any product mentioned or concept discussed in this article.

References

  1. 1.
    de Jager E, Gunnarsson R, Ho Y (2018) Implementation of the World Health Organization surgical safety checklist correlates to reduced surgical mortality and length of hospital admission in a high income country. World J Surg.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4703-x
  2. 2.
    Haynes AB et al (2017) Mortality trends after a voluntary checklist-based surgical safety collaborative. Ann Surg 266(6):923–929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kim RY et al (2015) Sustainability and long-term effectiveness of the WHO surgical safety checklist combined with pulse oximetry in a resource-limited setting: two-year update from Moldova. JAMA Surg 150(5):473–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mayer EK et al (2016) Surgical checklist implementation project: the impact of variable WHO checklist compliance on risk-adjusted clinical outcomes after national implementation: a longitudinal study. Ann Surg 263(1):58–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bergs J et al (2015) Barriers and facilitators related to the implementation of surgical safety checklists: a systematic review of the qualitative evidence. BMJ Qual Saf 24(12):776–786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Russ SJ et al (2015) A qualitative evaluation of the barriers and facilitators toward implementation of the WHO surgical safety checklist across hospitals in England: lessons from the “Surgical Checklist Implementation Project”. Ann Surg 261(1):81–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Safe Surgery Checklist Implementation Guide (2015) Ariadne Labs, Boston, MA. http://www.safesurgery2015.org/. Accessed 13 Aug 2018

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ariadne LabsBostonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Health Policy and ManagementHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public HealthBostonUSA
  3. 3.Harvard Medical School, SurgeryBostonUSA
  4. 4.Department of SurgeryMassachusetts General HospitalBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations