Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities in the Surgical Management and Outcomes of Patients with Colorectal Carcinoma
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer mortality in the USA. We aimed to determine racial and socioeconomic disparities in the surgical management and outcomes of patients with CRC in a contemporary, national cohort.
We performed a retrospective analysis of the National Inpatient Sample for the period 2009–2015. Adult patients diagnosed with CRC and who underwent colorectal resection were included. Multivariable linear and logistic regressions were used to assess the effect of race, insurance type, and household income on patient outcomes.
A total of 100,515 patients were included: 72,552 (72%) had elective admissions and 27,963 (28%) underwent laparoscopic surgery. Patients with private insurance and higher household income were consistently more likely to have laparoscopic procedures, compared to other insurance types and income levels, p < 0.0001. Black patients, compared to white patients, were more likely to have postoperative complications (OR 1.23, 95% CI, 1.17, 1.29). Patients with Medicare and Medicaid, compared to private insurance, were also more likely to have postoperative complications (OR 1.30, 95% CI, 1.24, 1.37 and OR 1.40, 95% CI, 1.31, 1.50). Patients in low-household-income areas had higher rates of any complication (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.06, 1.16).
The use of laparoscopic surgery in patients with CRC is strongly influenced by insurance type and household income, with Medicare, Medicaid and low-income patients being less likely to undergo laparoscopic surgery. In addition, black patients, patients with public insurance, and patients with low household income have significant worse surgical outcomes.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest.
- 2.Chen CF, Lin YC, Tsai HL, et al (2018) Short-and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted surgery, mini-laparotomy and conventional laparotomy in patients with Stage I–III colorectal cancer. J Minim Access Surg, epub ahead of printGoogle Scholar
- 3.Shavers VL (2007) Racial/ethnic variation in the anatomic subsite location of in situ and invasive cancers of the colon. J Natl Med Assoc 99:733–748Google Scholar
- 7.Zhang Q, Wang Y, Hu H et al (2017) Impact of socioeconomic status on survival of colorectal cancer patients. Oncotarget 8:106121–106131Google Scholar
- 10.Schlottmann F, Gaber C, Strassle PD, et al (2018) Cholecystectomy vs. cholecystostomy for the management of acute cholecystitis in elderly patients. J Gastrointest Surg, epub ahead of printGoogle Scholar
- 14.Bagshaw PF, Allardyce RA, Frampton CM et al (2012) Long-term outcomes of the Australasian randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and conventional open surgical treatments for colon cancer: the Australasian Laparoscopic Colon Cancer Study trial. Ann Surg 256(6):915–919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Bolen JC, Rhodes L, Powell-Griner EE et al (2000) State-specific prevalence of selected health behaviors, by race and ethnicity—behavioral risk factor surveillance system, 1997. MMWR CDC Surveill Summ 49:1–60Google Scholar