The Evolving Role of Vacuum Assisted Biopsy of the Breast: A Progression from Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy
The management of breast disease has been greatly facilitated by the technology of needle biopsy interventions, and over the past 30 years, this has evolved from the use of fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) to the current methodology of vacuum assisted biopsy (VAB).
This article provides an historical review of the application of needle interventions of the breast in the diagnosis and management of breast conditions, and discusses current indications for the use of vacuum assisted biopsies and vacuum assisted excisions.
Whilst FNAB continues to have a limited role in breast disease diagnosis, the necessity of achieving an histological diagnosis has preferentially seen the development and wider application of automated core needle biopsies (CNB) and VAB in the assessment and management of breast lesions. The advantages of CNB and VAB include the ability to distinguish in situ and invasive disease pre-operatively, and the ability to achieve prior knowledge of immunohistochemical tumour markers particularly in the setting of neoadjuvant drug treatments.
Due to its ability to obtain larger tissue samples, VAB does have diagnostic advantages over CNB and indications for the utilization of VAB are discussed. VAB additionally has an expanding role as a tool for breast lesion excision.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.Richard J Santen MD (2017) Benign breast disease in women; Endotext: www.endotext.org
- 3.Franzen S (1968) Zajicek j. Acta Radiol 7:241Google Scholar
- 12.American College of Radiology BI-RADS Reporting Classification. http://www.acr.org/Quality-Safety/RAD
- 18.Di LC, Puglisi F, Rimondi G et al (1996) Large core biopsy for diagnostic and prognostic evaluation of invasive breast carcinomas. Eur J Cancer 32A:1693–1700Google Scholar
- 25.Clarke D, Sudhakaran N, Gateley CA (2001) Replace fine needle aspiration cytology with automated core biopsy in the triple assessment of breast cancer. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 83:110–112Google Scholar
- 27.BreastScreen Australia National Accreditation Standards October 2015. http://www.cancerscreening.gov.au/internet/screening/publishing.nsf/Content/bsa-nas-comm
- 28.BreastScreen Queensland Open Biopsy Data Report; BSQ Surgery Quality Group Meeting 27 May 2016. Report to meetingGoogle Scholar
- 35.Krug B, Hellmich M, Ulhaas A, Krämer S, Rhiem K, Zarghooni V, Püsken M, Schwabe H, Grinstein O, Markiefka B, Maintz D (2016) Vacuum-assisted breast biopsies (VAB) carried out on an open 1.0T MR imager: influence of patient and target characteristics on the procedural and clinical results. Eur J Radiol. 85(6):1157–1166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.Wang ZL, Liu G, Li JL, Su L, Liu XJ, Wang W, Tang J (2011) Breast lesions with imaging-histologic discordance during 16-gauge core needle biopsy system: would vacuum-assisted removal get significantly more definitive histologic diagnosis than vacuum-assisted biopsy? Breast J 17(5):456–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 39.Suh YJ, Kim MJ, Kim E-K, Moon HJ, Kwak JY, Koo HR, Yoon JH (2012) Comparison of the underestimation rate in cases with ductal carcinoma in situ at ultrasound-guided core biopsy: 14-gauge automated core-needle biopsy vs 8- or 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy. Br J Radiol 85:e349–e356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 44.Park HL, Hong J (2014) Vacuum-assisted breast biopsy for breast cancer. Gland Surg 3(2):120–127Google Scholar
- 45.Hahn M, Krainick-Strobel U, Toellner T, Gissler J, Kluge S, Krapfl E, Peisker U, Duda V, Degenhardt F, Sinn HP, Wallwiener D, Gruber IV (2012) Interdisciplinary consensus recommendations for the use of vacuum-assisted breast biopsy under sonographic guidance: first update 2012. Minimally Invasive Breast Intervention Study Group (AG MiMi) of the German Society of Senology (DGS); Study Group for Breast Ultrasonography of the German Society for Ultrasound in Medicine (DEGUM). Ultraschall Med. 33(4):366–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar