World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 42, Issue 5, pp 1327–1339 | Cite as

Impact of Trauma System Structure on Injury Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  • Lynne Moore
  • Howard Champion
  • Pier-Alexandre Tardif
  • Brice-Lionel Kuimi
  • Gerard O’Reilly
  • Ari Leppaniemi
  • Peter Cameron
  • Cameron S. Palmer
  • Fikri M. Abu-Zidan
  • Belinda Gabbe
  • Christine Gaarder
  • Natalie Yanchar
  • Henry Thomas Stelfox
  • Raul Coimbra
  • John Kortbeek
  • Vanessa K. Noonan
  • Amy Gunning
  • Malcolm Gordon
  • Monty Khajanchi
  • Teegwendé V. Porgo
  • Alexis F. Turgeon
  • Luke Leenen
  • On behalf of the International Injury Care Improvement Initiative
Scientific Review
  • 329 Downloads

Abstract

Background

The effectiveness of trauma systems in decreasing injury mortality and morbidity has been well demonstrated. However, little is known about which components contribute to their effectiveness. We aimed to systematically review the evidence of the impact of trauma system components on clinically important injury outcomes.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and BIOSIS/Web of Knowledge, gray literature and trauma association Web sites to identify studies evaluating the association between at least one trauma system component and injury outcome. We calculated pooled effect estimates using inverse-variance random-effects models. We evaluated quality of evidence using GRADE criteria.

Results

We screened 15,974 records, retaining 41 studies for qualitative synthesis and 19 for meta-analysis. Two recommended trauma system components were associated with reduced odds of mortality: inclusive design (odds ratio [OR] = 0.72 [0.65–0.80]) and helicopter transport (OR = 0.70 [0.55–0.88]). Pre-Hospital Advanced Trauma Life Support was associated with a significant reduction in hospital days (mean difference [MD] = 5.7 [4.4–7.0]) but a nonsignificant reduction in mortality (OR = 0.78 [0.44–1.39]). Population density of surgeons was associated with a nonsignificant decrease in mortality (MD = 0.58 [−0.22 to 1.39]). Trauma system maturity was associated with a significant reduction in mortality (OR = 0.76 [0.68–0.85]). Quality of evidence was low or very low for mortality and healthcare utilization.

Conclusions

This review offers low-quality evidence for the effectiveness of an inclusive design and trauma system maturity and very-low-quality evidence for helicopter transport in reducing injury mortality. Further research should evaluate other recommended components of trauma systems and non-fatal outcomes and explore the impact of system component interactions.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Michèle Shemilt for her assistance with the search strategy.

Funding

This research is funded by the Fonds de Recherche du Québec—Santé (research career award, LM) and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Foundation Grant #353374 [LM], Canada Research Chair in Critical Care Neurology and Trauma [AFT]).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

268_2017_4292_MOESM1_ESM.docx (12 kb)
Online resource 1 MEDLINE research strategy via PubMed (DOCX 12 kb)
268_2017_4292_MOESM2_ESM.docx (86 kb)
Online resource 2 Description of included studies (DOCX 85 kb)
268_2017_4292_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (90 kb)
Online resource 3 Methodological quality of studies using the Risk of Bias In Non-randomized Studies—of Interventions (ROBINS-I) assessment tool (PDF 90 kb)
268_2017_4292_MOESM4_ESM.tif (18 kb)
Online resource 4 Funnel plots of odds ratio (OR, left) and mean differences (MD, right). Legend for online resource 4: The Y axis shows the standard errors (SE) of log OR (left) and MD (right) (TIFF 18 kb)
268_2017_4292_MOESM5_ESM.pdf (181 kb)
Online resource 5 Associations between trauma system components and clinically significant outcomes measured on a multiplicative (HR, OR, RR) or additive (DP, MD) scale from studies not included in meta-analyses and for which data were available to calculate summary measures. Legend for online resource 5: CI: confidence interval; benchmarking: a = complications, b = mechanical ventilation (days), c = hospital length of stay, d = intensive care unit length of stay, e = survival; DP: difference of proportions; HR: hazard ratio; interf. trans. prot.: interfacility transfer protocols; IRR: incidence rate ratio; MD: mean difference; OR: odds ratio; Pre-hos. maj.traum.def: pre-hospital major trauma definition; RR: relative risks; TC: trauma center. Measures in black are on a multiplicative scale (null value = 1), whereas measures in gray are on the additive scale (null value = 0) (PDF 180 kb)
268_2017_4292_MOESM6_ESM.tif (69 kb)
Online resource 6 Sensitivity analysis restricted to studies of high methodological quality (TIFF 69 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Levit K, Wier L, Stranges E et al (2009) HCUP facts and figures: statistics on hospital-based care in the United States 2007. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, RockvilleGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hofman K, Primack A, Keusch G et al (2005) Addressing the growing burden of trauma and injury in low- and middle-income countries. Am J Public Health 95:13–17CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mackenzie EJ, Rivara FP, Jurkovich GJ et al (2007) The national study on costs and outcomes of trauma. J Trauma 63:S54–S67 discussion S81–56 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Moore L, Turgeon AF, Lauzier F et al (2015) Evolution of patient outcomes over 14 years in a mature, inclusive Canadian trauma system. World J Surg 39:1397–1405. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-2977-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2012) The burden of disease and injury in Australia. http://www.aihw.gov.au/burden-of-disease/. Accessed 18 Apr 2016
  6. 6.
    World Health Organisation (2013) WHO global alliance for care of the injured. http://www.who.int/emergencycare/gaci/gaci_flyer_web.pdf?ua=1%5d. Accessed 11 May 2016
  7. 7.
    Mock C, Lormand J, Goosen J et al (2004) Guidelines for essential trauma care. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/42565/1/9241546409_eng.pdf. Accessed 10 Oct 2016
  8. 8.
    American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma (2008) Regional trauma systems: optimal elements, integration, and assessment. Systems consultation guide. American College of Surgeons, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nathens AB, Ball JW, Burton RA et al (2008) Regional trauma systems: optimal elements, integration, and assessment systems consultation guide. In: Surgeons Cotaco (ed). Chicago: American College of SurgeonsGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Celso B, Tepas J, Langland-Orban B et al (2006) A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing outcome of severely injured patients treated in trauma centers following the establishment of trauma systems. J Trauma 60:371–378 discussion 378 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gabbe BJ, Biostat GD, Simpson PM et al (2012) Improved functional outcomes for major trauma patients in a regionalized, inclusive trauma system. Ann Surg 255:1009–1015CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Higgins JPT, Green S (eds) (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration. Available from www.cochranehandbook.org
  13. 13.
    Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M et al (2015) Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ 349:g7647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Moore L, Champion H, O’Reilly G et al (2017) Impact of trauma system structure on injury outcomes: a systematic review protocol. Syst Rev 6:12CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lefebvre C, Manheimer E, Glanville J et al (2011) Searching for studies. In: Higgins J, Green S (eds) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Cochrane Collaboration, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sterne J, Higgins J, Reeves B (2016) ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions. http://www.riskofbias.info. Accessed 25 Mar 2016
  17. 17.
    DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7:177–188CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Berkman ND, Lohr KN, Ansari M, et al (2008) Grading the strength of a body of evidence when assessing health care interventions for the effective health care program of the agency for healthcare research and quality: an update methods guide for effectiveness and comparative effectiveness reviews. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and QualityGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Carr BG, Wolff CS, Schwab CW et al (2013) The association between geographic access to trauma care and injury death in the us. Acad Emerg Med 20:S313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Husum H, Gilbert M, Wisborg T et al (2003) Rural prehospital trauma systems improve trauma outcome in low-income countries: a prospective study from North Iraq and Cambodia. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care 54:1188–1196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Arreola-Risa C, Mock C, Herrera-Escamilla AJ et al (2004) Cost-effectiveness and benefit of alternatives to improve training for prehospital trauma care in Mexico. Prehosp Disaster Med 19:318–325CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    La Banque Mondiale (2014) Médecins (pour 1000 personnes). http://donnees.banquemondiale.org/indicateur/SH.MED.PHYS.ZS. Accessed 10 Sep 2015
  23. 23.
    Cheng CH, Graham CA, Gabbe BI et al (2008) Trauma care systems—a comparison of trauma care in Victoria, Australia, and Hong Kong, China. Ann Surg 247:335–342CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nijboer JMM, Wullschleger ME, Nielsen SE et al (2010) A comparison of severely injured trauma patients admitted to level 1 trauma centres in Queensland and Germany. ANZ J Surg 80:145–150CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Haider AH, David JS, Zafar SN et al (2013) Comparative effectiveness of inhospital trauma resuscitation at a French trauma center and matched patients treated in the United States. Ann Surg 258:178–183CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Timm A, Maegele M, Lefering R et al (2014) Pre-hospital rescue times and actions in severe trauma. A comparison between two trauma systems: Germany and the Netherlands. Injury 45:S43–S52CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Stiell IG, Nesbitt LP, Pickett W et al (2008) The OPALS major trauma study: impact of advanced life-support on survival and morbidity. CMAJ Can Med Assoc J = journal de l’Association medicale canadienne 178:1141–1152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Garner AA, Lee A, Weatherall A (2012) Physician staffed helicopter emergency medical service dispatch via centralised control or directly by crew—case identification rates and effect on the Sydney paediatric trauma system. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 20:82CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hesselfeldt R, Steinmetz J, Jans H et al (2013) Impact of a physician-staffed helicopter on a regional trauma system: a prospective, controlled, observational study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 57:660–668CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Carr BG, Geiger J, McWilliams N et al (2014) Impact of adding Level II and III trauma centers on volume and disease severity at a nearby Level i trauma center. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 77:764–768CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lecky F, Russell W, Fuller G et al (2016) The head injury transportation straight to neurosurgery (HITS-NS) randomised trial: a feasibility study. Health Technol Assess 20:1–198CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ali J, Adam RU, Gana TJ, Williams JI et al (1997) Trauma patient outcome after the prehospital trauma life support program. J Trauma 42:1018–1021CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rios-Diaz AJ, Metcalfe D, Olufajo OA et al (2016) Geographic distribution of trauma burden, mortality, and services in the United States: Does availability correspond to patient need? J Am Coll Surg 223(764–773):e762Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Latifi R, Hadeed GJ, Rhee P et al (2009) Initial experiences and outcomes of telepresence in the management of trauma and emergency surgical patients. Am J Surg 198:905–910CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Utter GH, Maier RV, Rivara FP et al (2006) Inclusive trauma systems: Do they improve triage or outcomes of the severely injured? J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care 60:529–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Murad MK, Larsen S, Husum H (2012) Prehospital trauma care reduces mortality. Ten-year results from a time-cohort and trauma audit study in Iraq. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 20:13CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    He JC, Kreiner LA, Sajankila N et al (2016) Performance of a regional trauma network: a state-wide analysis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 81:190–195CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Afifi R (2012) Impact of trauma system preparedness on the outcomes of severe injuries among child populations. Indian J Surg 74:456–461CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Deasy C, Gabbe B, Palmer C et al (2012) Paediatric and adolescent trauma care within an integrated trauma system. Injury 43:2006–2011CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Brown JB, Rosengart MR, Billiar TR et al (2016) Geographic distribution of trauma centers and injury-related mortality in the United States. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 80:42–50CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Chang DC, Eastman B, Talamini MA et al (2011) Density of surgeons is significantly associated with reduced risk of deaths from motor vehicle crashes in US Counties. J Am Coll Surg 212:862–866CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Desai A, Bekelis K, Zhao WY et al (2012) Increased population density of neurosurgeons associated with decreased risk of death from motor vehicle accidents in the United States Clinical article. J Neurosurg 117:599–603CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Moore L, Evans D, Hameed SM et al (2016) Mortality in Canadian trauma systems: a multicenter cohort study. Ann Surg 265:212–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Nathens AB, Jurkovich GJ, Maier RV et al (2001) Relationship between trauma center volume and outcomes. JAMA 285:1164–1171CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Mohammad A, Branicki F, Abu-Zidan FM (2014) Educational and clinical impact of advanced trauma life support (ATLS) courses: a systematic review. World J Surg 38:322–329. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2294-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Brown JB, Gestring ML, Stassen NA et al (2016) Geographic variation in outcome benefits of helicopter transport for trauma in the United States: a retrospective cohort study. Ann Surg 263:406–412CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Butler DP, Anwar I, Willett K (2010) Is it the H or the EMS in HEMS that has an impact on trauma patient mortality? a systematic review of the evidence. Emerg Med J EMJ 27:692–701CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Delgado MK, Staudenmayer KL, Wang NE et al (2013) Cost-effectiveness of helicopter versus ground emergency medical services for trauma scene transport in the United States. Ann Emerg Med 62(351–364):e319Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Taylor CB, Stevenson M, Jan S et al (2010) A systematic review of the costs and benefits of helicopter emergency medical services. Injury 41:10–20CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Galvagno SM, Thomas S, Stephens C et al (2013) Helicopter emergency medical services for adults with major trauma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 28(3):CD009228. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009228.pub2
  51. 51.
    Center for Disease Control and Prevention (2012) Guidelines for the field triage of injured patients. www.facs.org/~/media/files/quality%20programs/trauma/vrc%20resources/6_guidelines%20field%20triage%202011.ashx. Accessed 13 Apr 2017
  52. 52.
    Lidal IB, Holte HH, Vist GE (2013) Triage systems for pre-hospital emergency medical services—a systematic review. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 21:28CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Holmer H, Lantz A, Kunjumen T et al (2015) Global distribution of surgeons, anaesthesiologists, and obstetricians. Lancet Glob Health 3(Suppl 2):S9–11CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Meara JG, Leather AJ, Hagander L et al (2015) Global Surgery 2030: evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development. Lancet 386:569–624CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Hoyler M, Finlayson SR, McClain CD et al (2014) Shortage of doctors, shortage of data: a review of the global surgery, obstetrics, and anesthesia workforce literature. World J Surg 38:269–280. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2324-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Daniels KM, Riesel JN, Meara JG (2015) The scale-up of the surgical workforce. Lancet 385(Suppl 2):S41CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    WHO emergency and essential surgical care: WHO EESC Global database. http://www.who.int/surgery/eesc_database/en/. Accessed 27 Mar 2017
  58. 58.
    Melton SM, McGwin G Jr, Abernathy JH 3rd et al (2003) Motor vehicle crash-related mortality is associated with prehospital and hospital-based resource availability. J Trauma 54:273–279 discussion 279 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Vali Y, Rashidian A, Jalili M et al (2017) Effectiveness of regionalization of trauma care services: a systematic review. Public Health 146:92–107CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Nathens AB, Jurkovich GJ, Cummings P et al (2000) The effect of organized systems of trauma care on motor vehicle crash mortality. JAMA 283:1990–1994CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Liberman M, Mulder D, Lavoie A et al (2003) Multicenter Canadian study of prehospital trauma care. Ann Surg 237:153–160PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Schiller J, McCormack JE, Tarsia V et al (2009) The effect of adding a second helicopter on trauma-related mortality in a county-based trauma system. Prehosp Emerg Care 13:437–443CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Arthur M, Newgard CD, Mullins RJ et al (2009) A population-based survival assessment of categorizing level III and IV rural hospitals as trauma centers. J Rural Health 25:182–188CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Hamlat CA, Arbabi S, Koepsell TD et al (2012) National variation in outcomes and costs for splenic injury and the impact of trauma systems: a population-based cohort study. Ann Surg 255:165–170CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Vanni AJ, Hotaling J, Hamlat C et al (2012) Do inclusive trauma systems improve outcomes after renal trauma? J Trauma Acute Care Surg 72:385–389CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    McKee JL, Roberts DJ, Van Wijngaarden-Stephens MH et al (2015) The right treatment at the right time in the right place: a population-based, before-and-after study of outcomes associated with implementation of an all-inclusive trauma system in a large Canadian province. Ann Surg 261:558–564CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Simon R, Stone M, Cucuzzo J (2009) The impact of a new trauma center on an existing nearby trauma center. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care 67:645–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Crandall M, Sharp D, Wei X et al (2016) Effects of closure of an urban level I trauma centre on adjacent hospitals and local injury mortality: a retrospective, observational study. BMJ Open 6: 5 Article Number: e011700Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Boyd JM, Moore L, Atenafu EG et al (2017) A retrospective cohort study of the relationship between quality indicator measurement and patient outcomes in adult trauma centers in the United States. Injury 48:13–19CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Cameron PA, Gabbe BJ, Cooper DJ et al (2008) A statewide system of trauma care in Victoria: effect on patient survival. Med J Aust 189:546–550PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Moore L, Stelfox HT, Evans D et al (2017) Trends in injury outcomes across Canadian trauma systems. JAMA Surg 152:168–174CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Moore L, Stelfox H, Evans D et al (2016) Hospital and intensive care unit length of stay for injury admissions: a Pan-Canadian cohort study. Ann Surg. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002036
  73. 73.
    Bakke HK, Wisborg T (2011) Rural high north: a high rate of fatal injury and prehospital death. World J Surg 35:1615–1620. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1102-y CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Lipsky AM, Karsteadt LL, Gausche-Hill M et al (2014) A comparison of rural versus urban trauma care. J Emerg Trauma Shock 7:41–46CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Sampalis JS, Denis R, Lavoie A et al (1999) Trauma care regionalization: a process-outcome evaluation. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care 46:565–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lynne Moore
    • 1
    • 2
  • Howard Champion
    • 3
  • Pier-Alexandre Tardif
    • 1
    • 2
  • Brice-Lionel Kuimi
    • 2
  • Gerard O’Reilly
    • 4
    • 8
  • Ari Leppaniemi
    • 5
  • Peter Cameron
    • 4
    • 8
  • Cameron S. Palmer
    • 6
  • Fikri M. Abu-Zidan
    • 7
  • Belinda Gabbe
    • 8
  • Christine Gaarder
    • 9
  • Natalie Yanchar
    • 10
  • Henry Thomas Stelfox
    • 11
  • Raul Coimbra
    • 12
  • John Kortbeek
    • 13
  • Vanessa K. Noonan
    • 14
  • Amy Gunning
    • 15
  • Malcolm Gordon
    • 16
  • Monty Khajanchi
    • 17
  • Teegwendé V. Porgo
    • 1
    • 2
  • Alexis F. Turgeon
    • 1
    • 2
  • Luke Leenen
    • 15
  • On behalf of the International Injury Care Improvement Initiative
  1. 1.Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Division of Critical Care MedicineUniversité LavalQuébecCanada
  2. 2.Axe Santé des Populations et Pratiques Optimales en Santé (Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit), Traumatologie – Urgence - Soins intensifs (Trauma – Emergency – Critical Care Medicine)CHU de Québec – Université Laval Research Center (Enfant-Jésus Hospital)QuébecCanada
  3. 3.Department of SurgeryUniversity of the Health SciencesAnnapolisUSA
  4. 4.Emergency and Trauma CentreThe Alfred HospitalMelbourneAustralia
  5. 5.Abdominal CenterHelsinki University hospitalHelsinkiFinland
  6. 6.Trauma ServiceRoyal Children’s HospitalMelbourneAustralia
  7. 7.Department of Surgery, College of Medicine and Health SciencesUnited Arab Emirates UniversityAl-AinUnited Arab Emirates
  8. 8.School of Public Health and Preventive MedicineMonash UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  9. 9.Department of TraumatologyOslo University Hospital UllevalOsloNorway
  10. 10.Department of SurgeryDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada
  11. 11.Departments of Critical Care Medicine, Medicine and Community Health Sciences, O’Brien Institute for Public HealthUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada
  12. 12.Division of Trauma, Surgical Critical Care, Burns, and Acute Care SurgeryUniversity of California, San Diego Health SystemSan DiegoUSA
  13. 13.Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery and Division of Critical CareUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada
  14. 14.Rick Hansen InstituteVancouverCanada
  15. 15.Department of SurgeryUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
  16. 16.Department of Emergency MedicineUniversity of GlasgowGlasgowUK
  17. 17.Seth G.S. Medical College and KEM HospitalMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations