Advertisement

World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 34, Issue 4, pp 784–790 | Cite as

Use of Rigid Nephroscope for Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration—A Single-Center Experience

  • Muneer Khan
  • Syed Javid Farooq QadriEmail author
  • Syed Sajad Nazir
Article

Abstract

Background

Increasingly, laparoscopic biliary surgeons are undertaking laparoscopic cholecystectomy and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for patients with cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis. In laparoscopic common bile duct exploration a flexible choledochoscope is ordinarily used, and with this instrument the surgeon usually fails to remove large impacted stones. In contrast with use of a rigid nephroscope it is possible to remove all common bile duct stones irrespective of size and degree of impaction. The present study evaluates the efficiency of rigid nephroscope for managing common bile duct stones laparoscopically.

Methods

In the present study laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for stones was performed in 80 patients via standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy port sites. Patients with a common bile duct diameter >10 mm were included in this study. The rigid nephroscope was passed through the epigastric port and negotiated into the common bile duct through a choledochotomy. Stones were removed with graspers. Large hard stones were fragmented by pneumatic lithotripsy.

Results

Of the 80 patients treated in this manner, 72 (90%) had multiple common bile duct calculi, and 8 (10%) had a solitary common bile duct calculus. Mean common bile duct diameter was 15.3 mm (range: 10–37 mm). Conversion to open common bile duct exploration was necessary in 1 case (1.25%) because of difficult dissection secondary to extensive dense adhesions. In 7 patients (8.75%) a pneumatic lithotripter was used to fragment stones. Choledochotomy was managed by placing a T-tube in 21 (26.25%) patients, by effecting primary closure in 58 (72.5%) patients, and by choledochoduodenostomy in 1 (1.25%) patient. The mean operative time in this series was 83 min (range: 53–135 min). The mean postoperative hospital stay was 4.2 days (range: 3–19 days). One patient (1.25%) developed cholangitis 5 months after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration; the cause was a residual common bile duct stone.

Conclusions

A rigid nephroscope can be used for managing all types of common bile duct calculi irrespective of site, size, composition, or degree of impaction. Its use can be expected to become the standard for laparoscopic common bile duct exploration, especially for removing large calculi from a dilated common bile duct.

Keywords

Common Bile Duct Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Common Bile Duct Stone Common Bile Duct Exploration Distal Common Bile Duct 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Rahila Javid Qadri for assistance in reviewing the literature and formatting the manuscript.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (wmv 3484 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Nahrwold D (1986) The biliary system. In: Sabiston X (ed) Textbook of surgery. W. B. Saunders, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Way LW, Admirand WJ, Dunphy JE (1972) Management of choledocholithiasis. Ann Surg 176:347–359CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cuschieri A, Croce E, Faggioni A et al (1996) EAES [European Association of Endoscopic Surgeons] ductal stone study. Preliminary findings of multi-center prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage vs single-stage management. Surg Endosc 10:1130–1135CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arregui M, Davis CJ, Arkush AM et al (1992) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with endoscopic sphincterotomy and stone extraction or laparoscopic choledochoscopy and electrohydraulic lithotripsy for management of cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 6:10–15CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cotton PB (1984) Endoscopic management of bile duct stones (apples and oranges). Gut 25:587–597CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carr-Locke DL (1990) Acute gallstone pancreatitis and endoscopic therapy. Endoscopy 22:180–183CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vitale GC, Larson GM, Wieman TJ et al (1993) The use of ERCP in the management of common bile duct stones in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 7:9–11CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hunter J (1992) Laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration. Am J Surg 163:53–58CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Carroll BJ, Phillips EH, Daykhovsky L et al (1992) Laparoscopic choledochoscopy: an effective approach to the common duct. J Laparoendosc Surg 2:15–21PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Petelin J (1993) Laparoscopic approach to common duct pathology. Am J Surg 165:487–491CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Franklin ME, Pharand D (1994) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Surg Laparosc Endosc 4:119–124CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Phillips E, Carroll BJ, Pearlstein R et al (1993) Laparoscopic choledochoscopy and extraction of common bile duct stones. World J Surg 17:22–28CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tranter Se, Thompson MH (2002) Comparison of endoscopic sphicterotomy and laparoscopic exploration of CBD. Br J Surg 89:1495–1504CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sand J, Airo I, Hiltunen KM et al (1992) Changes in biliary bacteria after endoscopic cholangiography and sphincterotomy. Am Surg 58:324–328PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gupta P, Bhartia VK (2005) Laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones: our experience. Indian J Surg 67:94–99Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tanaka M, Takahta S, Konomi H et al (1998) Long-term consequences of endosphincterotomy for bile duct stones. Gastointest Endosc 48:465–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ekbom A, Hsieh C, Yuen J et al (1993) Risk of extrahepatic bile duct cancer after cholecystectomy. Lancet 342:1262–1265CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Leibermann MA, Philips EH, Carroll BJ et al (1996) Cost effective management of complicated choledocholithiasis: laparoscopic transcystic exploration vs ES. J Am Coll Surg 182:488–494Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Martin IJ, Bailey IS, Rhodes M et al (1998) Towards T-tube free laparoscopic bile duct exploration. Am Surg 228:29–34Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wu JS, Soper NJ (2002) Comparison of laparoscopic choledochotomy closure techniques. Surg Endosc 16:1309–1313CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Williams JAR, Treacy PJ, Sidey CS et al (1994) Primary duct closure versus T-tube drainage following exploration of the common bile duct. Aust N Z J Surg 64:823–826CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lygidakis NJ (1983) Choledochotomy for biliary lithiasis: T-tube drainage or primary closure—effects on postoperative bacteremia and T-tube bile infection. Am J Surg 146:254–256CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lygidakis NJ (1983) Operative risk factors of cholecystectomy–choledochotomy in the elderly. Surg Gynecol Obstet 157:l5–l19Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lygidakis NJ (1984) Incidence of bile infection in biliary lithiasis. Effects on postoperative bacteremia of choledochoduodenostomy, T-tube drainage, and primary closure of the common bile duct after choledochotomy—a prospective trial. Am Surg 50:236–240PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Koivusalo A, Mäkisalo H, Talja A et al (1996) Bacterial adherence and biofilm formation on latex and silicone T-tubes in relation to bacterial contamination of bile. Scand J Gastroenterol 31:398–403CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Horgan PG, Campbell AC, Gray GR et al (1989) Biliary leakage and peritonitis following removal of T tubes after bile duct exploration. Br J Surg 76:1296–1297CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Galan CP, Alonso AC (1990) Bile leakage after removal of T tubes from the common bile duct. Br J Surg 77:1075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bark K, Gamblin TC, Zuckerman R et al (2009) Operative choledochoscopic laser lithotripsy for impacted intrahepatic gallstones: a novel surgical approach. Surg Endosc 23:221–224CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wenner DE, Whitwam P, Rosser J et al (2005) A stone extraction facilitation device to achieve an improved technique for performing LCBDE. Surg Endosc 19:120–125CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Muneer Khan
    • 1
  • Syed Javid Farooq Qadri
    • 1
    Email author
  • Syed Sajad Nazir
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryGovernment Medical College SrinagarSrinagarIndia

Personalised recommendations