Advertisement

Environmental Management

, Volume 63, Issue 3, pp 352–365 | Cite as

Frozen Histories or Narratives of Change? Contextualizing Land-Use Dynamics for Conservation of Historical Rural Landscapes

  • Martin DolejšEmail author
  • Jiří Nádvorník
  • Pavel Raška
  • Jiří Riezner
Article
  • 55 Downloads

Abstract

Current research has identified extensive changes in land-use structure and land management of Central European rural landscapes due to shifting political and economic trajectories. These changes are exemplified by diverse processes of agricultural intensification, privatization and land fragmentation, land abandonment and overall changes in modes of production. The extensive record of these historically specific processes has posed a fundamental challenge for rural landscape conservation, which is addressed in this paper. First, we identify the key contradictions in rural landscape conservation, which include (i) conservation based on cultural versus environmental/ecological values, (ii) conservation based on spatial landscape patterns versus individual landscape features, and (iii) conservation based on the preservation of past landscapes versus conservation that also address the processes of change. Subsequently, we use a case study of an existing open-air museum in Zubrnice, northern Czechia, to analyze and discuss these dichotomies. In this regional case study, we first contextualize the land-use/land-cover change (LULC) reconstructed from old maps using a thorough archive (documentary proxies) and field research (survey of agrarian terraces, clearance cairns, and remnants of orchards) that enabled the construction of a narrative of specific landscape structures and features. Finally, we integrate the collected data with a novel methodological approach that allow for the spatial identification of the landscape segments that represent the narratives of historical change in modes of rural production and are therefore suitable for integration within the existing open-air museum to improve its conservation and education status.

Keywords

Land use Land cover Natural heritage Cultural landscape Landscape biography 

Notes

Acknowledgments

MD thanks Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Environmental Sciences Internal Grant Agency (Grant no. 42300/1312/423154) and JR, PR, and JN to Jan Evangelista Purkyně University SGS-173-07-06 “Landscape belongs to winners: Environmental history of NW Bohemia” grant for funding of the study.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Antrop M (2005) Why landscapes of the past are important for the future. Landsc Urban Plan 70:21–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. AOPK ČR (2018). Ústřední seznam ochrany přírody—CHKO České středohoří [nature conservation catalogue]. http://drusop.nature.cz/. Accessed 19 Jan 2018
  3. Balej M, Anděl J (2008) Land use changes and environmental stress accounting (case study from northwestern part of the Czech-German borderland). J Geogr Reg Plan 1:97–109Google Scholar
  4. Balej M, Raška P, Anděl J, Chvátalová A (2010) Memory of a Landscape—a Constituent of Regional Identity and Planning? In: Anděl J, Bičík I, Dostál P, Lipský Z, Shahneshin SG (eds) Landscape Modelling: Geographical Space, Transformation and Future Scenarios. Urban and Landscape Perspectives, Volume 8. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg, p 109–123Google Scholar
  5. Balestrieri M (2015) Theories and methods of rural landscape classification in Europe: the Italian approach. Int J Rural Manag 11:156–174.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0973005215604932 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baumann M, Kuemmerle T, Elbakidze M, Ozdogan M, Radeloff VC, Keuler NS, Prishchepov AV, Kruhlov I, Hostert P (2011) Patterns and drivers of post-socialist farmland abandonment in Western Ukraine. Land Use Policy 28:552–562.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.11.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beranová L, Balej M, Raška P (2017) Assessing the geotourism potential of abandoned quarries with multitemporal data (České Středohoří Mts., Czechia). GeoScape 11(2):93–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (2000) Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecol Appl 10:1251–1262Google Scholar
  9. Bičík I, Štěpánek V (1994) Post-war changes of the land-use structure in Bohemia and Moravia: case study Sudetenland. GeoJournal 32:253–259.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01122117 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bičík I, Jeleček L, Štěpánek V (2001) Land-use changes and their social driving forces in Czechia in the 19th and 20th centuries. Land Use Policy 18:65–73.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-8377(00)00047-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Black AE, Strand E, Wright RG, Scott JM, Morgan P, Watson C (1998) Landsc Urban Plan 43:49–63.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(98)00096-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brockwell S, O’Connor S, Byrne D (2013) Transcending the Culture–Nature Divide in Cultural Heritage: Views from the Asia–Pacific region. Australian National University, CanberraCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bürgi M, Hersperger AM, Hall M, Southgate, EWB, Schneeberger N (2007) Using the past to understand the present land use and land cover. In: A Changing World. Challenges for Landscape Research p 133–144.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4436-6_9
  14. Cerreta M, Mele R (2012) A landscape complex values map: integration among soft values and hard values in a spatial decision support system. In: Beniamino Murgante O, Gervasi S, Misra N, Nedjah AM, Rocha D, Taniar D, Apduhan BO (eds) Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin,  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31075-1_49 653–669
  15. Chuman T, Romportl D (2010) Multivariate classification analysis of cultural landscapes: an example from the Czech Republic. Landsc Urban Plan 98:200–209.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.08.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Davis P (2008) New museologies and the ecomuseum. In: Graham BJ, Howard P (eds) The Ashgate research companion to heritage and identity. Ashgate, Burlington, p 397–414Google Scholar
  17. Davis P, Corsane G (2014) Communities, heritage and new cultural landscapes: ecomuseological approaches. In: Roe M, Taylor K (eds) New cultural landscapes. Routledge, London, p 118–135Google Scholar
  18. Déjeant-Pons M (2006) The European landscape convention. Landsc Res 31:363–384.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01426390601004343 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. ESRI (2014) ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10.3. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, CAGoogle Scholar
  20. Fialová D, Chromy P, Kucera Z, Spilková J, Štych P, Vágner J (2010) The forming of regional identity and identity of regions in Czechia - Introduction to the research on the impact of second housing and tourism. Acta Univ Carol Geogr 45:49–60Google Scholar
  21. Filipe B, José de M (2011) Why are cultural landscapes of various values? Thinking about heritage landscape evaluation and monitoring tools. J Landsc Ecol 4:5–17.  https://doi.org/10.2478/v10285-012-0030-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Forejt M, Dolejš M, Raška P (2018) How reliable is my historical land-use reconstruction? Assessing uncertainties in old cadastral maps. Ecol Indic 94(Part 1):237–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Foundation of PLA České středohoří. Czechoslovak Ministry of Culture (1976, bill no. 6883/76)Google Scholar
  24. Galletti CS, Ridder E, Falconer SE, Fall PL (2013) Maxent modeling of ancient and modern agricultural terraces in the Troodos foothills, Cyprus. Appl Geogr 39:46–56.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.11.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. George AL, Bennet A (2005) Case studies and theory development in the Social Sciences. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  26. Glassheim E (2006) Ethnic cleansing, communism, and environmental devastation in Czechoslovakia’s Borderlands, 1945–1989. J Mod Hist 78:65–92.  https://doi.org/10.1086/499795 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Glassheim E (2015) Unsettled landscapes: Czech and German conceptions of social and ecological decline in the Postwar Czechoslovak Borderlands. J Contemp Hist 50:318–336.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022009414551103 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gullino P, Larcher F (2013) Integrity in UNESCO World Heritage sites. A comparative study for rural landscapes. J Cult Herit 14:389–395.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2012.10.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Havlíček T, Hupková M (2013) Sacred structures in the landscape: the case of rural Czechia. Scott Geogr J 129:100–121.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14702541.2012.754931 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hamre LN, Domaas ST, Austad I, Rydgren K (2007) Land-cover and structural changes in a western Norwegian cultural landscape since 1865, based on an old cadastral map and a field survey. Landsc Ecol 22:1563–1574.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-007-9154-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Harrison R (2015) Beyond “Natural” and “Cultural” Heritage: toward an ontological politics of heritage in the age of anthropocene. Herit & Soc 8:24–42.  https://doi.org/10.1179/2159032X15Z.00000000036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Harvey F (2013) The power of mapping: considering discrepancies of Polish Cadastral Mapping. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 103:824–843.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2012.720228 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ihse M, Lindahl C (2000) A holistic model for landscape ecology in practice: the Swedish survey and management of ancient meadows and pastures. Landsc Urban Plan 50:59–84.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00080-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jančárek P (1994) Marriage in Zubrnice in 19th Century. Hist Demogr 18:167–178. in czechGoogle Scholar
  35. Janda J, Urbanová M, Štibinger J (2000) Revitalization of riverine systems of Luční stream, minucipality of Zubrnice, Ústí nad Labem. KONIP, Praha, (in czech)Google Scholar
  36. Jepsen MR, Kuemmerle T, Müller D, Erb K, Verburg PH, Haberl H, Vesterager JP, Andrič M, Antrop M, Austrheim G, Björn I, Bondeau A, Bürgi M, Bryson J, Caspar G, Cassar LF, Conrad E, Chromý P, Daugirdas V, Van Eetvelde V, Elena-Rosselló R, Gimmi U, Izakovicova Z, Jančák V, Jansson U, Kladnik D, Kozak J, Konkoly-Gyuró E, Krausmann F, Mander Ü, McDonagh J, Pärn J, Niedertscheider M, Nikodemus O, Ostapowicz K, Pérez-Soba M, Pinto-Correia T, Ribokas G, Rounsevell M, Schistou D, Schmit C, Terkenli TS, Tretvik AM, Trzepacz P, Vadineanu A, Walz A, Zhllima E, Reenberg A (2015) Transitions in European land-management regimes between 1800 and 2010 Land Use Policy 49:53–64.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.07.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jones M, Howard P, Olwig KR, Primdahl J, Sarlöv Herlin I (2007) Multiple interfaces of the European Landscape Convention. Nor J Geogr 61:207–216.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00291950701709176 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kopecký M, Vojta J (2009) Land use legacies in post-agricultural forests in the Doupovské Mountains, Czech Republic. Appl Veg Sci 12:251–260.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-109X.2009.01023.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Krivosudský R (2014) Viticulture in the context of historical landscape structure in the small Carpathian region—model area of Rača. GeoScape 8:9–16.  https://doi.org/10.2478/geosc-2014-0002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kučera Z, Kučerová-Kuldová S, Chromý P (2008) Landscape heritage between areal preservation and areal development—the Case of Czechia. Geogr Pol 81:5–24Google Scholar
  41. Kupková L, Bičík I, Najman J (2013) Land cover changes along the iron curtain 1990–2006. Geografie 118:95–115Google Scholar
  42. Lasanta T, Arnáez J, Pascual N, Ruiz-Flaño P, Errea MP, Lana-Renault N (2017) Space–time process and drivers of land abandonment in Europe. CATENA 149:810–823.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2016.02.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ledvinka F, Hušek P, Nováková J (1999) The enlargement of MLA Zubrnice proposal. Národní památkový ústav, Ústí nad Labem. (in czech)Google Scholar
  44. LeGoff J (2015) Must We Divide History into Periods?. Columbia University Press, New York, NY, (English translation)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Levers C, Müller D, Erb K, Haberl H, Jepsen MR, Metzger MJ, Meyfroidt P, Plieninger T, Plutzar C, Stürck J, Verburg PH, Verkerk PJ, Kuemmerle T (2018) Archetypical patterns and trajectories of land systems in Europe. Reg Environ Change 18:715–732.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0907-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Linnell JDC, Kaczensky P, Wotschikowsky U, Lescureux N, Boitani L (2015) Framing the relationship between people and nature in the context of European conservation. Conserv Biol 29:978–985.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12534 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Liu ZH, Lee YJ (2015) A method for development of ecomuseums in Taiwan. Sustainability 7:13249–13269.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su71013249 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. NPÚ (2018) Památkový katalog, památková rezervace Zubrnice [cultural heritage catalogue]. http://pamatkovykatalog.cz/. Accessed 19 Jan 2018
  49. Palang H, Spek T, Stenseke M (2011) Digging in the past: new conceptual models in landscape history and their relevance in peri-urban landscapes. Landsc Urban Plan 100:344–346.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.01.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Plieninger T, Draux H, Fagerholm N, Bieling C, Bürgi M, Kizos T, Kuemmerle T, Primdahl J, Verburg PH (2016) The driving forces of landscape change in Europe: a systematic review of the evidence. Land Use Policy 57:204–214.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.04.040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pressenda P, Sturani ML (2007) Landscape and museums: some critical reflections on initial developments in Italy. Erde 138:47–69Google Scholar
  52. Primdahl J (2014) Agricultural landscape sustainability under pressure. Landsc Res 39(2):123–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Raška P, Zábranský V, Dubišar K, Kadlec A, Hrbáčová A, Strnad T (2014) Documentary proxies and interdisciplinary research on historic geomorphologic hazards: a discussion of the current state from a central European perspective. Nat Hazards 70:705–732.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0839-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rivière GH (1985) The ecomuseum—an evolutive definition. Mus Int 37:182–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Roymans N, Gerritsen F, Van der Heijden C, Bosma K, Kolen J (2009) Landscape biography as research strategy: the case of the South Netherlands Project. Landsc Res 34:337–359.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01426390802381185 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Schmucki R, De Blois S, Bouchard A, Domon G (2002) Spatial and temporal dynamics of hedgerows in three agricultural landscapes of southern Quebec, Canada. Environ Manag 30:651–64.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-002-2704-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sklenicka P, Molnarova K, Brabec E, Kumble P, Pittnerova B, Pixova K, Salek M (2009) Remnants of medieval field patterns in the Czech Republic: analysis of driving forces behind their disappearance with special attention to the role of hedgerows. Agric Ecosyst Environ 129:465–473.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2008.10.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Slámová M, Jančura P, Daniš D (2013) Methods of historical landscape structures identification and implementation into landscape studies. Ekologia 32:267–276.  https://doi.org/10.2478/eko-2013-0023 Google Scholar
  59. Sowińska-Świerkosz BN, Chmielewski TJ (2016) A new approach to the identification of landscape quality objectives (LQOs) as a set of indicators J Environ Manag 184:596–560.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.10.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Stark K (1907) Ergebnisse der Obstbaumzählung im Vereinsgebiete des Obst- und Gartenbau-Vereines für das deutsche Elbetal in Böhmen nach dem Stande vom Jahre 1905. Otto Henckel, TetschenGoogle Scholar
  61. Statistische Zentralkommission, k.k. (1904) Gemeindelexikon von Böhmen. Bearbeitet auf Grund der Ergebnisse der Volkszählung vom 31. Dezember 1900. Wien, k. k. Hof- und Staatsdruckerei.Google Scholar
  62. Trombulak SC, Baldwin RF (2010) Landscape-scale conservation planning. Springer, Heidelberg, London, New York, NYCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Turner S, Bolòs J, Kinnaird T (2017) Changes and continuities in a Mediterranean landscape: a new interdisciplinary approach to understanding historic character in western Catalonia. Landsc Res 1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2017.1386778
  64. ÚAZK—Ústřední archiv zeměměřictví a katastru (2018) Výkazy s porovnáním ploch 1845 a 1948. http://archivnimapy.cuzk.cz/. Accessed 19 Jan 2018. (in czech)
  65. Verešová M, Supuka J (2013) Changes of landscape structure and cultural values of vineyard landscape. Acta Univ Agric Silvic Mendel Brun 61:1459–1470.  https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201361051459 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Vojta J (2007) Relative importance of historical and natural factors influencing vegetation of secondary forests in abandoned villages. Preslia 79:223–244Google Scholar
  67. Volpiano M (2011) Indicators for the assessment of historic landscape features. In: Cassatella C, Peano A (eds) Landscape Indicators: Assessing and Monitoring Landscape QualitySpringer, Dordrecht,  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0366-7_5 77–104
  68. Vos W, Meekes H (1999) Trends in European cultural landscape development: perspectives for a sustainable future. Landsc Urban Plan 46:3–14.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00043-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Vráblíková J, Ledvinka F, Součková H, Šoch M, Tempír Z, Zahálka J (1995) Perspectives of ecomuseums in Zubrnice: final report. Univerzita J. E. Purkyně, Ústí nad Labem. (in czech)Google Scholar
  70. Wickham H (2009) ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York, NYCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Yang Y, Zhang S, Yang J, Chang L, Bu K, Xing X (2014) A review of historical reconstruction methods of land use/land cover. J Geogr Sci 24:746–766.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-014-1117-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Environmental SciencesCzech University of Life Sciences PraguePraha-SuchdolCzechia
  2. 2.Department of Geography, Faculty of ScienceJan Evangelista Purkyně University in Ústí nad LabemÚstí nad LabemCzechia

Personalised recommendations