How Does Socio-institutional Diversity Affect Collaborative Governance of Social–Ecological Systems in Practice?
- 187 Downloads
Social and institutional diversity (“diversity” hereafter) are important dimensions in collaborative environmental governance, but lack empirical assessment. In this paper, we examine three aspects of diversity hypothesized in the literature as being important in collaborative forms of environmental governance—the presence of diverse actors, diverse perspectives, and diverse institutions. The presence of these aspects and formative conjectures were empirically considered using a mixed methods approach in four biosphere reserves in Sweden and Canada. We found that the diversity of actors involved and domains of authority varied among cases, that stakeholder perspectives were highly diverse in all cases, and that institutional variety (in terms of strategies, norms, and rules) was evident in all cases, but differed among them. Empirical support from the cases further affirms that diversity contributes to the ability to engage with a broader set of issues and challenges; diversity contributes to novel approaches to solving problems within the governance group; and diversity contributes to the flexibility of the group involved in governance in terms of addressing challenges. One conjecture, that diversity decreases the efficiency of governance in decision-making and responding to issues, was not supported by the data. However, our analysis indicates that there might be a trade-off between diversity and efficiency. The findings highlight differences in the ways in which diversity is conceptualized in the literature and on the ground, emphasizing the pragmatic advantages of actively seeking diversity in terms of competencies and capacities.
KeywordsBiosphere reserves Bridging organizations Diversity Resilience Collaborative environmental governance
This research was funded by Vetenskapsrådet, the Swedish Research Council, grant 2012-5498. We also acknowledge funding by MISTRA through a core grant to Stockholm Resilience Centre. Participation by the managers and others from the Frontenac Arch, Georgian Bay, Kristianstads Vattenrike, and Östra Vätterbranterna Biosphere Reserves is gratefully acknowledged. Our thanks are also extended to our colleague, Beatrice Crona, for her insights in conceptualizing the project. Finally, we wish to acknowledge Flor de Luna Estrada, Malena Heinrup, Katrina Krievins, and Kerrie Pickering for their research assistance.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Bäckstrand K (2006) Multi-stakeholder partnerships for sustainable development: rethinking legitimacy, accountability, and effectiveness. Environ Policy Gov 16:290–306Google Scholar
- Biggs R, Schlüter M, Biggs D, Bohensky EL, BurnSilver S, Cundill G, Dakos V, Daw TM, Evans LS, Kotschy K, Leitch AM, Meek C, Quinlan A, Raudsepp-Hearne C, Robards MD, Schoon ML, Schultz L, West PC (2012) Toward principles for enhancing the resilience of ecosystem services. Annu Rev Environ Resour 37:421–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Booher DE, Innes JE (2006) Complexity and adaptive policy systems: CALFED as an emergent form of governance for sustainable management of contested resources. In Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the ISSS-2006, Sonoma, CA, USA.Google Scholar
- Chapin FS, Kofinas GP, Folke C (eds) (2009) Principles of ecosystem stewardship: resilience-based natural resource management in a changing world. Springer Science & Business Media, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
- Creswell JW (2009) Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
- Ellis F (2000) Rural livelihoods and diversity in developing countries. Oxford University Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
- Gray B (1989) Collaborating: finding common ground for multiparty problems. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
- Lax DA, Sebenius JK (1986) The manager as negotiator: bargaining for cooperation and competitive gain. The Free Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
- Leonard R, Jones GT (1989) Quantifying diversity in archaeology. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Lietaer B, Ulanowicz RE, Goerner SJ, McLaren N (2010) Is our monetary structure a systemic cause for financial instability? Evidence and remedies from nature. J Future Stud 14:89–108Google Scholar
- Low B, Ostrom E, Simon C, Wilson J (2003) Redundancy and diversity: do they influence optimal management? In: Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (eds) Navigating social-ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, p 83–114Google Scholar
- May RM (1974) Stability and complexity in model ecosystems. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Naeem S, Bunker DE, Hector A, Loreau M, Perrings C (eds) (2009) Biodiversity, ecosystem functioning, and human wellbeing: an ecological and economic perspective. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Norberg J, Wilson J, Walker B, Ostrom E (2008) Diversity and resilience of social-ecological systems. In: Norberg J, Cumming G (eds) Complexity theory for a sustainable future. Columbia University Press, New York, NY, p 46–79Google Scholar
- Odum EP (1953) Fundamentals of ecology. Saunders, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
- Ostrom E (2005) Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University Press, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
- Sabatier PA, Focht W, Lubell M, Trachtenberg Z, Vedlitz A, Matlock M (2005) Collaborative approaches to watershed management. In: Sabatier PA, Focht W, Lubell M, Trachtenberg Z, Vedlitz A, Matlock M (eds) Swimming upstream: collaborative approaches to watershed management. The MIT Press, Cambridge, p 3–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schultz L (2009) Nurturing resilience in social-ecological systems: lessons learned from bridging organizations. Dissertation, Stockholm University, Stockholm, SwedenGoogle Scholar
- UNESCO (1996) Biosphere Reserves: The Seville Strategy and the Statutory Framework. UNESCO, ParisGoogle Scholar
- Wondolleck JM, Yaffee SL (2000) Making collaboration work: lessons from innovation in natural resource management. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- Yin RK (2009) Case study research: design and methods, 4th edn. SAGE Publications, Inc., Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar