Advertisement

Environmental Management

, Volume 63, Issue 1, pp 46–59 | Cite as

Expanding Staff Voice in Protected Area Management Effectiveness Assessments within Kenya’s Maasai Mara National Reserve

  • Lawrence AllenEmail author
  • Katie Krafte Holland
  • Hunter Holland
  • Salaton Tome’
  • Moriaso Nabaala
  • Simon Seno
  • James Nampushi
Article
  • 50 Downloads

Abstract

The concept of protected areas (PA) is one of the most widely used policy tools for biodiversity conservation including habitat and wildlife protection. Despite the importance and emphasis placed on protected area management, biodiversity is still in decline and more species are in danger of extinction. Some analyses have indicated that more than 40% of protected areas are poorly managed. To improve management effectiveness, the inclusion of diverse stakeholder information in articulating management strategies has been strongly encouraged; however, stakeholder involvement is often poorly integrated, and an opportunity granted only to select stakeholder groups, with PA staff, especially at lower organizational levels, minimally involved. Further, protected area management effectiveness (PAME) assessments are most frequently used as an aggregated outcome measure of effectiveness but these data should also inform management practice. Thus, for PA managers to obtain a greater understanding of issues impacting their effectiveness, they would benefit from including the voices of staff at all working levels. Therefore, the purpose of this investigation was to survey 135 wardens and rangers at all organizational levels from the two administrative sectors of Maasai Mara National Reserve to determine their perceptions of management effectiveness and to determine if significant differences existed across staff levels and administrative sectors. Significant differences were found to exist across staff levels and administrative authorities supporting the need for expanded staff voice in establishing effective PA management plans.

Keywords

Protected area management effectiveness Stakeholder participation RAPPAM Maasai Mara National Reserve Adaptive management 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Narok County Government, Kenya for its financial support and technical assistance in making this project possible. We also want to thank Clemson University Institute for Parks for its financial support and the International Conservation Caucus Foundation for its assistance in organizing this project. Further, we want to thank the Chief Warden, Narok sector of the Maasai Mara National Reserve and the Chief Executive for the Mara Conservancy, for their support in conducting the surveys of the rangers and officers in their respective sectors of the Maasai Mara National Reserve. Finally, we also want to acknowledge that a Kenyan Government research permit was obtained from the National Commission for Science, Technology, and Innovation (NACOSTI). We thank NACOSTI for its assistance and support.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Anthony, B (2014) Review of international protected area management effectiveness (PAME) experience. Association for Water and Rural Development, Budapest, Hungary. (USAID/RESLIM/ AID-674-A-13-00008)Google Scholar
  2. Coad L, Leverington F, Knights K, Geldmann J, Eassom A, Kapos V, Kingston N, de Lima M, Zamora C, Curadros I, Nolte C, Burgess ND, Hockings M (2015) Measuring impact of protected area management interventions: Current and future use of the global database of protected area management effectiveness. Philos Trans R Soc B 370:20140281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cook CN, Hockings M (2011) Opportunities for improving the rigor of management effectiveness evaluations in protected areas. Conserv Lett 4:372–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Eklund J, Cabeza M (2017) Quality of governance and effectiveness of protected areas: Crucial concepts for conservation planning. Ann New Y Acad Sci 1399:27–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Erwin J (2003) WWF: Rapid assessment and prioritization of protected areas management (RAPPAM) methodology. WWF, Gland, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  6. Francoso RD, Brandao R, Nogueira CC, Salmona YB, Bomfim Machado R, Colli GR (2015) Habitat loss and the effectiveness of protected areas in the Cerrado Biodiversity Hotspot. Nat & Conserv 13:35–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Geldmann J, Coad L, Barnes M, Craigie ID, Hockings M, Knights K, Leverington F, Cuadros IC, Zamora C, Woodley S, Burgess ND (2015) Changes in protected area management effectiveness over time: A global analysis. Biol Conserv 191:692–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gitau JW (ed.) (2012) Payment for wildlife conservation in the Maasai Mara Ecosystem. ABCD Series Policy Brief 2. Association for the Strengthening of Agricultural Research in Eastern and Central Africa, Entebbe, UgandaGoogle Scholar
  9. Hockings M, Stolton S, Leverington F, Dudley N, Courrau J (2006) Evaluating effectiveness: A framework for assessing the management of protected areas, 2nd Edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN (n.d.)) Protected area categories. http://www.iucn.org/theme/protected-areas/about/protected-area-categories
  11. International Union for Conservation of Nature and United Nations Environment Program - World Conservation Monitoring Centre (IUCN & UNEP-WCMC (2015). The World Database on Protected Areas. UNEP-WCMC, November 2015. http://www.protectedplanet.net
  12. Jones N, McGinlay J, Dimitrakopoulos PG (2017) Improving social impact assessment of protected areas: A review of the literature and directions for future research. Environ Impact Assess Rev 64:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Leverington F, Hockings M, Pavese H, Lemos Costa K, Courrau J (2008) Management effectiveness evaluation in protected areas—a global study. Supplementary report No. 1: Overview of approaches and methodologies. The University of Queensland, Gatton, TNC, WWF, IUCN-WCPA, AustrailaGoogle Scholar
  14. Leverington F, Lemos Costa K, Pavese H, Lisle A, Hockings M (2010) A global analysis of protected area management effectiveness. Environ Manag 46:685–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lockwood M (2010) Good governance for terrestrial protected areas: A framework, principles, and performance outcomes. J Environ Manag 91:754–766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Løvschal M, Bøcher PK, Pilgaard J, Amoke I, Odingo A, Thuo A, Svemmomg. J-C (2017) Fencing bodes a rapid collapse of the unique Greater Mara ecosystem. Sci Rep 7:41450.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep41450 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Luyet V, Schlaepfer R, Parlane MB, Buttler A (2012) A framework to implement stakeholder participation in environmental projects. J Environ Manag 111:213–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Petursson JG, Vedeld P, Vatn A (2013) Going transboundary? An institutional analysis of transboundary protected areas management challenges at Mt. Elgon, East Africa. Ecol Soc 18(4):28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Reed MS (2008) Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biol Conserv 141(10):417–2431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Reed MS, Graves A, Dandy N, Postumus H, Hubacek K, Morris J, Prell C, Quinn DH, Stringer LC (2009) Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. J Environ Manag 90:1933–1949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Stringer L, Dougill A, Fraser E, Hubacek K, Prell C, Reed MS (2006) Unpacking “participation” in the adaptive management of social–ecological systems: a critical review. Ecol Soc 11(2):39, http://www.ecologyandsoceity.org/vol11/iss2/art39/ CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. UNESCO. (2010) The African Great Rift Valley - The Maasai Mara. http://whc.unesco.org/en/tentativelists/5512/
  23. Watson D (2014) Masai Mara: The Mara Triangle official guide. Photoprint, ScotlandGoogle Scholar
  24. Watson EM, Dudley N, Segan DB, Hockings M (2014) The performance and potential of protected areas. Nature 515:67–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Western D, Russell SC, Cuthill I (2009) The status of wildlife in protected areas compared to non-protected areas of Kenya PLoS ONE 4(7):e6140CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Clemson University Institute for ParksClemsonUSA
  2. 2.University of North Carolina-WilmingtonWilmingtonUSA
  3. 3.Maasai Mara UniversityNarokKenya

Personalised recommendations