Emergence of Collaborative Environmental Governance: What are the Causal Mechanisms?
Conflict in environmental governance is common, and bringing together stakeholders with diverse perspectives in situations of conflict is extremely difficult. However, case studies of how diverse stakeholders form self-organized coalitions under these circumstances exist and provide invaluable opportunities to understand the causal mechanisms that operate in the process. We focus on the case of the Georgian Bay Biosphere Reserve nomination process, which unfolded over several years and moved the region from a series of serious conflicts to one where stakeholders came together to support a Biosphere Reserve nomination. Causal mechanisms identified from the literature and considered most relevant to the case were confirmed in it, using an 'explaining outcomes' process tracing methodology. Perceived severity of the problem, institutional emulation, and institutional entrepreneurship all played an important role in the coalition-building process. The fear of marginalization was identified as a potential causal mechanism that requires further study. The findings here contribute to filling an important gap in the literature related to causal mechanisms for self-organized coalition-building under conflict, and contribute to practice with important considerations when building a coalition for natural resource management and governance.
KeywordsEnvironmental governance Causal mechanism Collaboration
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All data collection procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Armitage, D, Plummer R, Baird J, Dzyundzyak A, Schultz L, Armitage D, Bodin Ö (2017) Learning and adaptive co-management. Environ Policy Gov. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eet.1781/full
- Buckles D (Ed) (1999) Cultivating peace: Conflict and collaboration in natural resource management. International Development Research Centre and The World Bank, Ottawa, CanadaGoogle Scholar
- Coleman JS (1990) Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. ISBN 9780674312265Google Scholar
- Daniels SE, Walker GB (2001) Working through environmental conflict: The collaborative learning approach. Praeger Publishers, WestportGoogle Scholar
- Dolowitz D, Marsh D (1996) Who learns what from whom: A review of the policy transfer literature. Political Stud 44(2):343–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00334.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Environment Canada (n.d.) Science and monitoring synthesis for South-Eastern Georgian Bay. Environ Canada. https://georgianbay.civicweb.net/document/118759
- Fulmer CA, Gelfand MJ (2012) At what level (and in whom) we trust: Trust across multiple organizational levels. J Manag 38(4):1167–1230Google Scholar
- GBBR (n.d.) History and achievements. Georgian Bay Biosphere Reserve http://www.gbbr.ca/about-us/history-and-achievements/
- Georgian Bay Biosphere Reserve Inc. (2004) Nomination Submission from Canada for the Georgian Bay Littoral Biosphere Reserve. Greater Bay Area Foundation and the Georgian Bay Biosphere Reserve Inc. https://www.gbbr.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/GBLBR-nomination-document1.pdf
- Georgian Bay (Township) v. Skidmore, 1992 CanLii 8597 (ON SCDC) Google Scholar
- Gerring John (2007) Case study research—principles and practices. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Gruber A (2004) Navigating diverse identities: Building coalitions through redistribution of academic capital-An exercise in praxis. Seton Hall L. Rev. 35:1201Google Scholar
- Kingdon JW (1995) Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies. New York: Addison-Wesley Educational Pulishers, IncGoogle Scholar
- Lubell M (2005) Do watershed partnerships enhance beliefs conducive to collective action? In: Sabatier PA, Focht W, Lubell M, Trachtenberg Z, Vedlitz A, Matlock M (eds) Swimming upstream: collaborative approaches to watershed management. MIT Press, Cambridge MA, pp. 201–232Google Scholar
- McAvoy M, McDonald D, Carlson M (2003) American Indian/First Nation place attachment to park lands: The case of the Nuu-chah-nulth of British Columbia. J Park Recreat Adm 21(2):84–104Google Scholar
- Meinzen-Dick R, Knox A (1999) Collective action property rights and devolution of natural resource management: A conceptual framework. Workshop on Collective Action Property Rights and Devolution of Natural Resource Puerto Azul Philippines June (pp 21–24)Google Scholar
- Mulgan G, Tucker S, Ali R, Sanders B (2006) Social innovation: What it is, why it matters and how it can be accelerated. The Young Foundation, London, UKGoogle Scholar
- Olson M (1965) The logic of collective action. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Olson M. (2002). Power and prosperity. New York: Basic Books 2000. Q J Austrian Econ 5(2): 85–87Google Scholar
- Olsson P, Folke C, Berkes F (2004b) Adaptive comanagement for building resilience in social-ecological systems. J Environ Manag 34(1):75–90Google Scholar
- Ontario (Minister of Natural Resources) v. Cote, 2005 CanLii33542 (ON SC).Google Scholar
- Ostrom E (2007) A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas. Science 104(39):15181–15187Google Scholar
- Ostrom E (2009) Institutional rational choice: An assessment of the institutional analysis and development framework. In: Sabatier PA, Weible CM (eds) Theories of policy process, 3rd edn. Westview Press, Boulder, CO, pp. 267–306Google Scholar
- Plummer R, Dzyundzyak A, Baird J, Schultz L, Armitage D, Bodin, Ö (2017b) Understanding how environmental governance leads to social and ecological outcomes using participant perceptions and causal pathways. PLOS One http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0185375
- Sabatier PA, Focht W, Lubell M., Trachtenberg Z, Veditz A, Matlock M. (2005). Swimming upstream. Collaborative approaches to watershed management. M.I.T. Press Cambridge, Massachusetts, USAGoogle Scholar
- Schlager E (2004) Common-pool resource theory. In: Durant RF, Fiorino DJ, O’Leary R Eds. Environmental governance reconsidered: challenges, choices and opportunities. MIT Press, Massachusetts, pp. 145–176Google Scholar
- Sealey-Ruiz Y (2013) Learning to resist: Educational counter-narratives of black college re-entry mothers. Teach Coll Rec 115(4):1–31Google Scholar
- Statistics Canada (1996) 1996 Census of population. Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 95F0181XDB96001.Google Scholar
- Stone D (2001) Learning lessons, policy transfer and the international diffusion of policy ideas. CSGR Working Paper No. 69/01Google Scholar
- UNESCO (1996) Biosphere reserves: the Seville strategy and the statutory framework of the world network. UNESCO, ParisGoogle Scholar
- Wondolleck JM, Yaffee SL (2000) Making collaboration work. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar