Invited Discussion on: Masculinizing Chest Reconstruction in Transgender and Nonbinary Individuals: An Analysis of Epidemiology, Surgical Technique and Postoperative Outcomes
- 21 Downloads
Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
In this study, the authors’ objectives are to compare the postoperative outcomes associated with two different categories of masculinizing chest surgery in transgender and nonbinary individuals. They perform an epidemiological review of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Database (ACS-NSQIP) to evaluate techniques similar to traditional mastectomy with and without free nipple grafts versus techniques resembling more traditional breast reduction procedures. This is a retrospective analysis of data culled from 2010 to 2107 and identified only by procedural CPT codes and ICD-9 and 10 diagnosis codes. Preoperative history and postoperative morbidity (up to 30 days) were examined and subjected to statistical...
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Human and Animal Rights
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
For this type of study, informed consent is not required.
- 1.NSQIP A. Users Guide for the 2015 ACS NSQIP participant use data file 2015Google Scholar
- 2.Gatherwright J, Wanta J, Long TC, Knackstedt R, Medalie D (2018) Female to male mastectomy in 245 transgender patients: a prospective study of demographics, patient satisfaction, and outcomes using a novel, validated “TRANS”-questionnaire (Trans-Q). Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 6(9 Suppl):108–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar