Advertisement

A New Perspective to the Periorbital Aesthetics: Bella Eyes

  • Ufuk Askeroglu
  • Ozgur Pilanci
Original Article Oculoplastic
  • 62 Downloads

Abstract

Introduction

The term beautiful eyes can be defined as youthful, brilliant, vivid, and attractive eyes. The anthropometric findings about beautiful eyes may differ according to gender or race. In order to form such a beautiful eye, a variety of surgical, nonsurgical, or combination methods for periorbital region rejuvenation have been proposed. The surgical methods include coronal/peritrichial, endoscopic, upper and lower eyelid, or transconjunctival incisional procedures. Neuromodulators, fillers, and laser treatments are some of the nonsurgical approaches. Regardless of the method, while treating this particular area, the aesthetic unit concept should always be taken into consideration.

Methods

We attempted to combine an endoscopic dynamic canthopexy procedure with endoscopic temporal and brow lift, which we call “bella eyes” to achieve a more attractive look, especially in young people who desire a slanted eyelid. We aim to share our clinical experience from 35 patients and the technical details of the bella eyes procedure.

Results

Patient satisfaction was high, and the endoscopic technique eliminated all of the minor deformities and provided excellent harmony through each subunit of the periocular area with minimal discomfort and well-hidden scars.

Conclusion

We believe that this procedure is a good way to achieve a beautiful eye in young women.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Keywords

Periorbital rejuvenation Bella eyes Endoscopic brow lift Endoscopic dynamic canthopexy Slanted eyelid 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

All patients signed an informed consent.

Supplementary material

Video 1

The endoscopic dissection starting from the temporal zone down to the lateral canthal retinaculum. The suture is passed from the middle 1/3 of the retinaculum. You can see the effect of dynamic canthopexy with adequate vectoral pull on our patient (MP4 129478 kb)

266_2019_1497_MOESM2_ESM.mp4 (11.4 mb)
Video 2 A short video of preoperative (left) and postoperatively 6 months after the Bella eyes procedure (right) of a 33-year-old female is presented (MP4 11711 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Rhee SC, Woo KS, Kwon K (2012) Biometric study of eyelid shape and dimensions of different races with references to beauty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 36(5):1236–1245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Romm S (1989) The changing face of beauty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 13(2):91–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Iglesias-Linares A, Yáñez-Vico RM, Moreno-Manteca B, Moreno-Fernández AM, Mendoza-Mendoza A, Solano-Reina E (2011) Common standards in facial esthetics: craniofacial analysis of most attractive black and white subjects according to People magazine during previous 10 years. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 69(6):e216–e224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Perrett DI, May KA, Yoshikawa S (1994) Facial shape and judgements of female attractiveness. Nature 368(6468):239–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    McCurdy JA Jr (2006) Beautiful eyes: characteristics and application to aesthetic surgery. Facial Plast Surg 22(3):204–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liu D, Hsu WM (1986) Oriental eyelids anatomic difference and surgical consideration. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 2(2):59–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Heir JS, Sandhu BS, Barber HD (2000) Considerations for esthetic facial surgery in the African-American patient Atlas. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 8(2):113–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rhee SC, Lee SH (2010) Attractive composite faces of different races. Aesthetic Plast Surg 34(6):800–801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Arnaoutakis D, Bassichis B (2018) Surgical and nonsurgical techniques in forehead rejuvenation. Facial Plast Surg 34(5):466–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Beer KR, Julius H, Dunn M, Wilson F (2014) Remodeling of periorbital, temporal, glabellar, and crow’s feet areas with hyaluronic acid and botulinum toxin. J Cosmet Dermatol 13(2):143–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Snider CC, Amalfi AN, Hutchinson LE, Sommer NZ (2017) New insights into the anatomy of the midface musculature and its implications on the nasolabial fold. Aesthetic Plast Surg 41(5):1083–1090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Park KS, Park DD (2017) Objective outcome measurement after upper blepharoplasty: an analysis of different operative techniques. Aesthetic Plast Surg 41(1):64–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bernardini FP, Gennai A, Izzo L, Zambelli A, Repaci E, Baldelli I, Fraternali-Orcioni G, Hartstein ME, Santi PL, Quarto R (2015) Superficial enhanced fluid fat injection (Seffi) to correct volume defects and skin aging of the face and periocular region. Aesthet Surg 35(5):504–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fathi R, Pfeiffer ML, Tsoukas M (2015) Minimally invasive eyelid care in dermatology: medical, laser, and cosmetic therapies. Clin Dermatol 33(2):207–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Morgan JM, Gentile RD, Farrior E (2005) Rejuvenation of the forehead and eyelid complex. Facial Plast Surg 21(4):271–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Langsdon P, Karter N (2018) Manipulation of the periorbital musculature. Facial Plast Surg 34(2):194–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wojtanowski MH (1994) Bicoronal forehead lift. Aesthetic Plast Surg 18(1):333–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ramirez OM (1995) Endoscopically assisted biplanar forehead lift. Plast Reconstr Surg 96(2):323–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Plowes Hernandez O, Montes-Bracchini JJ, Ulloa FL, LaFerriere K (2016) Endoscopic brow elevation and reshaping. Facial Plast Surg 32(6):607–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Guyuron B, Son JH (2017) Transpalpebral corrugator resection: 25-year experience, refinements and additional indications. Aesthetic Plast Surg 41(2):339–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Alghoul M (2019) Blepharoplasty: anatomy, planning, techniques, and safety. Aesthet Surg J 39(1):10–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Guida S, Nisticò SP, Farnetani F, Del Duca E, De Carvalho N, Persechino F, Verdina T, Giannetti L, D’Alessandro M, Urtis GG, Pellacani G, D’Alessandro G (2018) Resurfacing with ablation of periorbital skin technique: indications, efficacy, safety, and 3D assessment from a pilot study. Photomed Laser Surg 36(10):541–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Balzani A, Chilgar RM, Nicoli M, Sapountzis S, Lazzeri D, Cervelli V, Nicoli F (2013) Novel approach with fractional ultrapulse CO2 laser for the treatment of upper eyelid dermatochalasis and periorbital rejuvenation. Lasers Med Sci 28(6):1483–1487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lighthall JG (2018) Rejuvenation of the upper face and brow: neuromodulators and fillers. Facial Plast Surg 34(2):119–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Beer KR, Bayers S, Beer J (2014) Aesthetic treatment considerations for the eyebrows and periorbital complex. J Drugs Dermatol 13(1 Suppl):s17–s20PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    de Saint Cornette, Cyr B, Maillard GF, Scheflan M, Ramirez O (1993) The subperiosteal lift. Aesthetic Plast Surg 17(2):151–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gülbitti HA, Bouman TK, Marten TJ, van der Lei B (2018) The orbital oval balance principle: a morphometric clinical analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 142(4):451e–461eCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lessa S, Nanci M (2009) Simple canthopexy used in transconjunctival blepharoplasty. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 25(4):284–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yaremchuk MJ, Chen YC (2009) Bridge of bone canthopexy. Aesthet Surg J 29(4):323–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tepper OM, Steinbrech D, Howell MH, Jelks EB, Jelks GW (2015) A retrospective review of patients undergoing lateral canthoplasty techniques to manage existing or potential lower eyelid malposition: identification of seven key preoperative findings. Plast Reconstr Surg 136(1):40–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Botti G, Botti C, Rossati L, Gualdi A, Nocini P, Nocini R, Bertossi D (2019) “Dynamic Canthopexy” Drill Hole Canthal Repositioning. Aesthet Surg J.  https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjz077 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Flowers RS, Ceydeli A (2008) The open coronal approach to forehead rejuvenation. Clin Plast Surg 35(3):331–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Trussler AP, Schaub TA, Byrd HS (2012) Endoscopic management of the difficult lower eyelid: a review of 300 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 130(3):690–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bernardini FP, Skippen B, Gennai A, Zambelli A (2019) Minimal incisions vertical endoscopic lifting (MIVEL) for the management of lateral canthal and lower eyelid malposition. Aesthet Surg J 39(5):472–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ufuk Askeroglu
    • 1
  • Ozgur Pilanci
    • 1
  1. 1.IstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations