Advertisement

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

, Volume 43, Issue 4, pp 938–945 | Cite as

Transconjunctival Müller’s muscle Tucking Method for Non-incisional Correction of Mild Ptosis: The Effectiveness and Maintenance

  • Hyun Ho Han
  • Min Soo KimEmail author
Original Article Oculoplastic
  • 274 Downloads

Abstract

Background

In patients with a mild degree ptosis who undergo non-incisional double-eyelid blepharoplasty, simultaneous correction of ptosis is needed to prevent loosening. The transconjunctival Müller’s muscle tucking (TMMT) method may be useful in these cases.

Objectives

The authors performed this study to present the details of the current use of the TMMT method and to provide objective evidence for ptosis correction and its sustained effect.

Methods

A total of 322 eyelids in 161 patients who underwent mild ptosis correction with the TMMT method from July 2012 to December 2017 were retrospectively examined. The continuous suture method using a single stitch was used for double-fold formation, and the TMMT method was used for ptosis correction for the other incision. The margin to reflex distance (MRD) 1 was evaluated at pre-operation, immediate post-operation, and at 2, 6 months post-operation.

Results

A total of 34 patients who had more than 6 months of follow-up were included. Right-side MRD1 values were 2.08 (± 0.19) mm before the surgery, 3.49 (± 0.16) mm immediately after the surgery, 3.33 (± 0.14) mm at postoperative 2 months, and 3.22 (± 0.17) mm at postoperative 6 months (p < 0.001). The difference of MRD1 between immediate post-operation and at 6 months was 0.25 mm without statistical significance (p > 0.05). Complications (fold loosening, asymmetry, and ptosis recurrence) occurred in three cases (8.8%), all of which were re-corrected by applying the TMMT method.

Conclusions

The TMMT method was useful for correction of mild ptosis, showed little recurrence, and prevented loss of fold by giving a vertical force to the double-fold.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Keywords

Müller’s muscle Tucking Blepharoplasty Ptosis 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose and no financial support.

Ethical Approval

This study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed Consent

All patients provided written informed consent prior to enrollment.

Supplementary material

Video showing non-incisional double-eyelid blepharoplasty (MP4 69965 kb)

Video showing TMMT method for ptosis correction (MP4 64318 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Baek S-M, Kim S-S, Tokunaga S, Bindiger A (1989) Oriental blepharoplasty: single-stitch, nonincision technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 83:236–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lee Y-J, Baek R-M, Chung W-J (2003) Nonincisional blepharoplasty using the debulking method. Aesthet Plast Surg 27:434–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Moon K-C, Yoon E-S, Lee J-M (2013) Modified double-eyelid blepharoplasty using the single-knot continuous buried non-incisional technique. Arch Plast Surg 40:409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mikamo M (1997) Mikamo’s double-eyelid operation: the advent of Japanese aesthetic surgery 1896. Plast Reconstr Surg 99:664 discussion-9 Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jang SY, Chin S, Jang JW (2014) Ten years’ experience with unilateral conjunctival mullerectomy in the Asian eyelid. Plast Reconstr Surg 133:879–886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Putterman AM, Urist MJ (1975) Müller muscle-conjunctiva resection: technique for treatment of blepharoptosis. Arch Ophthalmol 93:619–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Guyuron B, Davies B (1988) Experience with the modified Putterman procedure. Plast Reconstr Surg 82:775–780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liu MT, Totonchi A, Katira K, Daggett J, Guyuron B (2012) Outcomes of mild to moderate upper eyelid ptosis correction using Müller’s muscle-conjunctival resection. Plast Reconstr Surg 130:799e–809eCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Simon GJB, Lee S, Schwarcz RM, McCann JD, Goldberg RA (2005) External levator advancement vs Müller’s muscle–conjunctival resection for correction of upper eyelid involutional ptosis. Am J Ophthalmol 140:426–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shimizu Y, Nagasao T, Asou T (2010) A new non-incisional correction method for blepharoptosis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63:2004–2012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hu J-W, Byeon JH, Shim H-S (2015) Simultaneous double eyelid blepharoplasty and ptosis correction with a single-knot, continuous, nonincisional technique: a five-year review. Aesthet Surg J 36:14–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lee EJ, Hwang K (2013) Balanced plication of Müller muscle tendon through conjunctiva for blepharoptosis correction. J Craniofac Surg 24:599–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Beard C (1966) The surgical treatment of blepharoptosis: a quantitative approach. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 64:401Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vagefi MR, Lin CC, McCann JD, Anderson RL (2008) Local anesthesia in oculoplastic surgery: precautions and pitfalls. Arch Facial Plast Surg 10:246–249Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Marcet MM, Setabutr P, Lemke BN et al (2010) Surgical microanatomy of the Müller muscle-conjunctival resection ptosis procedure. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 26:360–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Maheshwari R, Maheshwari S (2011) Muller’s muscle resection for ptosis and relationship with levator and Muller’s muscle function. Orbit 30:150–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Weinstein GS, Buerger JG (1982) Modification of the Müller’s muscle-conjunctival resection operation for blepharoptosis. Am J Ophthalmol 93:647–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dresner SC (1991) Further modifications of the Müller’s muscle-conjunctival resection procedure for blepharoptosis. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 7:114–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jeong S, Lemke BN, Dortzbach RK, Park YG, Kang HK (1999) The Asian upper eyelid: an anatomical study with comparison to the Caucasian eyelid. Arch Ophthalmol 117:907–912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Choi Y, Kang HG, Nam YS (2017) Three skin zones in the Asian upper eyelid pertaining to the Asian blepharoplasty. J Craniofac Surg 28:892–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Murchison AP, Sires BA, Jian-Amadi A (2009) Margin reflex distance in different ethnic groups. Arch Facial Plast Surg 11:303–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jutley G, Carpenter D, Hau S et al (2016) Upper and lower conjunctival fornix depth in healthy white caucasian eyes: a method of objective assessment. Eye 30:1351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hwang K, Shin YH, Kim DJ (2008) Conjoint fascial sheath of the levator and superior rectus attached to the conjunctival fornix. J Craniofac Surg 19:241–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mizuno T (2016) Treatment of suture-related complications of buried-suture double-eyelid blepharoplasty in Asians. Plast Reconstr Surg Global Open 4(8):e839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Putterman A, Urist M (1978) Müller’s muscle-conjunctival resection ptosis procedure. Ophthalmic Surg 9:27–32Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Asan Medical CenterUniversity of Ulsan College of MedicineSeoulRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Yonsei ENB Plastic Surgery ClinicSeoulRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations