Advertisement

Staged Mosaic Punching Excision of a Kissing Nevus on the Eyelid

  • Hyun-Jin Cho
  • Won Lee
  • Man-Kyung Jeon
  • Jai-Oong Park
  • Eun-Jung YangEmail author
Original Article Facial Surgery
  • 24 Downloads

Abstract

Background

A congenital divided nevus, also known as kissing nevus, is a type of congenital compound nevus that affects equal areas of the upper and lower eyelids. The edges of the nevus touch or “kiss” during closure of the lids, owing to its extension to the lid margins. Multiple treatment modalities, such as dermabrasion, cryotherapy, primary closure after excision, and skin grafts, have been proposed; however, complications such as recurrence, ectropion, skin color mismatch, and scar contractures are known to occur. This study aimed to introduce a staged excision using the 10,600-nm CO2 pulsed laser to remove a congenital divided nevus without noticeable complications.

Materials and Methods

From August 2015 to December 2018, patients with congenital divided nevus underwent staged laser excision. Seven patients underwent staged mosaic pattern punch excision with a laser. Eight patients underwent concomitant excision, and one patient underwent skin grafting of the medial canthus. Patient satisfaction was assessed immediately and at 3 months after the procedure.

Results

During the study period, 15 patients (10 women and 5 men), with a mean age of 26.0 years (range 13–73 years), underwent laser excision. Continuity of the eyelid margins was maintained in 13 patients. In one patient, the eyelashes grew inward and developed inflammation. No patient developed complications during the healing process, except for partial loss of cilia. Eleven patients were very satisfied, whereas three were satisfied with the results. One patient discontinued treatment after two laser sessions.

Conclusion

We performed multiple staged mosaic punching excisions of a congenital divided nevus with the CO2 laser in 15 cases. We observed consistent therapeutic results without definite recurrence, while maintaining the continuity of the eyelid and eyelash.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Keywords

Kissing nevus Congenital divided melanocytic nevus Staged excision UltraPulse CO2 laser 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Ethical Approval

The need for informed consent was waived by the institutional review board of the Cheil General Hospital because the study was retrospective. The study conformed to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed Consent

For this type of study, informed consent is not required.

Supplementary material

266_2019_1362_MOESM1_ESM.mp4 (23.3 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (MP4 23852 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Desai SC, Walen S, Holds JB, Branham G (2013) Divided nevus of the eyelid: review of embryology, pathology and treatment. Am J Otolaryngol 34(3):223–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Margulis A, Adler N, Bauer BS (2009) Congenital melanocytic nevi of the eyelids and periorbital region. Plast Reconstr Surg 124(4):1273–1283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jia R, Zhu H, Lin M et al (2012) Clinicopathological characteristics and surgical outcomes of divided nevus of the eyelids: a decade’s experience on 73 cases. Ann Plast Surg 68(2):166–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lim SA, Ryu AY, Lee DL, Yoon YI (2012) Treatment of congenital divided nevus of the eyelid with excision and blepharoplasty. Arch Plast Surg 39(4):437–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zeng Y (2014) Divided nevus of the eyelid: successful treatment with CO2 laser. J Dermatol Treat 25(4):358–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ozaki M, Suga H, Eto H et al (2014) Efficacy of serial excisions of melanocytic nevi on the face using a carbon dioxide laser: a cosmetic point of view. Aesthetic Plast Surg 38(2):316–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fitzpatrick RE, Tope WD, Goldman MP, Satur NM (1996) Pulsed carbon dioxide laser, trichloroacetic acid, Baker–Gordon phenol, and dermabrasion: a comparative clinical and histologic study of cutaneous resurfacing in a porcine model. Arch Dermatol 132(4):469–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hyun-Jin Cho
    • 1
  • Won Lee
    • 2
  • Man-Kyung Jeon
    • 1
  • Jai-Oong Park
    • 3
  • Eun-Jung Yang
    • 4
    • 5
    Email author
  1. 1.Labella ClinicSeoulSouth Korea
  2. 2.Yonsei E1 Plastic Surgery ClinicAnyangSouth Korea
  3. 3.Cleantatoo ClinicSeoulSouth Korea
  4. 4.Department of Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeryHanyang University Seoul Hospital, Hanyang University College of MedicineSeoulSouth Korea
  5. 5.Department of Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeryHanyang University Seoul Hospital, Hanyang University College of MedicineSeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations