A Flexible Suspension Technique of Blepharoplasty: Clinical Application and Comparison with Traditional Technique
Double-eyelid blepharoplasty is one of the most popular aesthetic surgeries in China. But the traditional method produces a hidebound double eyelid due to its rigid suturing between the skin and the tarsus. The authors of this article concluded a novel technique of “flexible suspension technique” compared with traditional blepharoplasty which is considered as a “rigid fixation technique.”
This is a retrospective study of two groups of 100 Chinese Han females, on whom double-eyelid blepharoplasty was performed, 50 cases by “flexible suspension technique” and the other 50 by “rigid fixation technique.” The basic procedure of “flexible suspension technique” is suturing the orbicularis oculi muscle to the septal extension. Thus, the surgical connection between skin and tarsus is flexible. The surgical results were evaluated and compared using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale and Visual Analogue Scale/Score.
The “very much improved” rate in the “flexible suspension technique” group was higher than that in the “rigid fixation technique” group (p < 0.05). Postoperative appearances of the “flexible suspension technique” group were also better than the “rigid fixation technique” group with less edema (p < 0.05) and slighter incision scars (p < 0.05). However, the incidences of asymmetry and fold loss were higher in the “flexible suspension technique” group (p < 0.05).
The flexible suspension technique blepharoplasty can obtain a more natural appearance and has less adverse effects and shorter recovery time.
Level of Evidence IV
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
KeywordsBlepharoplasty Orbital septum Orbicularis oculi muscle Levator aponeurosis Dynamic
Funding was provided by the General Project Funds from the Health Department of Zhejiang Province (Grant No. 2016KYB022).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Human and Animal Rights
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
For this type of study informed consent is not required.
- 5.Rhoda SN, Fredric B, James L et al (2003) A randomized, double-blind, multicenter comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of restylane versus zyplast for the correction of nasolabial folds. Dermatol Surg 29:588–595Google Scholar
- 8.Sufan Wu, Shi Hangyan, Yan Sheng et al (2010) Combined anchor suture with external upper eyelid blepharoplasty in Asian patients. Arch Fac Plast Surg 12(4):230–234Google Scholar
- 12.Flowers RS (1975) Aesthetic surgery of the eyelids. In: Marchac D (ed) Transactions of the 6th international congress of plastic and reconstructive surgery. Masson, ParisGoogle Scholar