Advertisement

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

, Volume 43, Issue 4, pp 1128–1129 | Cite as

Meta-Analysis Should be Done in a Normative Manner

  • Pengfei Sun
  • Yanjin Wang
  • Zhenyu ChenEmail author
Letter to the Editor

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

References

  1. 1.
    Lynch JM, Sebai ME, Rodriguez-Unda NA et al (2018) Breast pocket irrigation with antibiotic solution at implant insertion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg 42(5):1179–1186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Downs SH, Black N (1998) The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of\nthe methodological quality both of randomised and\non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Commun Health 52:377–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hagströmer M, Ainsworth BE, Kwak L, Bowles HR (2012) A checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of validation studies on self-report instruments for physical activity and sedentary behavior. J Phys Act Health 9:S29–S36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Peters JL, Sutton AJ, Jones DR et al (2006) Comparison of two methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis. JAMA 295(6):676–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 339:b2700CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MedicineQingdao UniversityQingdaoPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Department of Plastic SurgeryAffiliated Hospital of Qingdao UniversityQingdaoPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations