Advertisement

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

, Volume 43, Issue 1, pp 91–97 | Cite as

Continuous Negative Pressure Drain is Associated with Better Outcome: A Randomized Prospective Trial in Plastic Surgery Patients

  • Ting Jiang
  • Jun Li
  • Jun RenEmail author
Original Article Facial Surgery
  • 136 Downloads

Abstract

Background

A randomized prospective trial to compare the effects on minimizing complications using continuous negative pressure drain and intermittent suction mode in plastic surgeries.

Methods

There were 174 cases of stage II post-auricular flap expansion and ear reconstruction, 76 cases of skin expansion flap repair, 56 cases of breast augmentation surgery, 58 cases of abdominoplasty, and 76 cases with free skin grafts. Patients were randomized to intermittent suction mode group (control group) and continuous negative pressure external drain group (intervention group) stratified by surgery types. In the intervention group, different pressure levels were applied according to the surgery types. The drainage volume, the length of time of external drainage, incidence of seroma, flap necrosis, the first intending healing rate and drain-associated bleeding were recorded and compared.

Results

Generally, fewer complications and better healing were observed in the intervention group. In patients with stage II post-auricular flap expansion and ear reconstruction, lower incidence of flap necrosis and seroma, higher first intention healing rate, greater drain volume but shorter time of drainage were observed in the intervention group (p < 0.05 for all). Similar results were shown in patients with skin expansion flap repair, breast augmentation, abdominoplasty, and free skin grafts. In patients who underwent free skin grafts, a higher graft success rate and lower graft infection rate were also observed (p < 0.01 for both). No drain-associated bleeding was observed.

Conclusions

A continuous negative pressure drain was associated with better outcomes in patients underwent various plastic surgeries and is a powerful technique in the postoperative management of plastic surgery.

Level of Evidence II

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Keywords

Continuous negative pressure drain Flap graft Intermittent drain Plastic surgery 

Notes

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the clinical study of continuous negative pressure drainage in the observation of curative effect after plastic surgery, Wuhan Municipal Health Bureau [2012] 70WX12C43.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors report no proprietary or commercial interest in any product mentioned or concept discussed in this article.

References

  1. 1.
    Lindsey WH, Masterson TM, Llaneras M, Spotnitz W, Wanebo HJ, Morgan RF (1988) Seroma prevention using fibrin glue during modified radical neck dissection in a rat model. Am J Surg 156:310–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nakatsuka T, Harii K, Asato H, Takushima A, Ebihara S, Kimata Y et al (2003) Analytic review of 2372 free flap transfers for head and neck reconstruction following cancer resection. J Reconstr Microsurg 19:363–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Van Heurn L, Brink P (1995) Prospective randomized trial of high versus low vacuum drainage after axillary lymphadenectomy. BJS 82:931–932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Morykwas MJ, Simpson J, Punger K, Argenta A, Kremers L, Argenta J (2006) Vacuum-assisted closure: state of basic research and physiologic foundation. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:121S–126SCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lee DL, Ryu AY, Rhee SC (2011) Negative pressure wound therapy: an adjuvant to surgical reconstruction of large or difficult skin and soft tissue defects. Int Wound J 8:406–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Swanson EW, Cheng H-T, Susarla SM, Lough DM, Kumar AR (2016) Does negative pressure wound therapy applied to closed incisions following ventral hernia repair prevent wound complications and hernia recurrence? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Plastic Surg 24(2):113–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Banwell PE, Musgrave M (2004) Topical negative pressure therapy: mechanisms and indications. Int Wound J 1:95–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Borgquist O, Ingemansson R, Malmsjö M (2011) The influence of low and high pressure levels during negative-pressure wound therapy on wound contraction and fluid evacuation. Plast Reconstr Surg 127:551–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Argenta LC, Morykwas MJ, Marks MW, DeFranzo AJ, Molnar JA, David LR (2006) Vacuum-assisted closure: state of clinic art. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:127S–142SCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Armstrong DG, Lavery LA, Consortium DFS (2005) Negative pressure wound therapy after partial diabetic foot amputation: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet 366:1704–1710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Evans D, Land L (2001) Topical negative pressure for treating chronic wounds: a systematic review. Br J Plast Surg 54:238–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Petzina R, Malmsjö M, Stamm C, Hetzer R (2010) Major complications during negative pressure wound therapy in poststernotomy mediastinitis after cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 140:1133–1136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Li T, Zhuang Q, Weng X, Zhou L, Bian Y (2014) Non-continuous versus continuous wound drainage after total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Int Orthop 38:361–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Morykwas MJ, Argenta LC, Shelton-Brown EI, McGuirt W (1997) Vacuum-assisted closure: a new method for wound control and treatment: animal studies and basic foundation. Ann Plast Surg 38:553–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kilpadi DV, Cunningham MR (2011) Evaluation of closed incision management with negative pressure wound therapy (CIM): hematoma/seroma and involvement of the lymphatic system. Wound Repair Regen 19:588–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wilhelmi BJ, Blackwell SJ, Mancoll JS, Phillips LG (1998) Creep vs. stretch: a review of the viscoelastic properties of skin. Ann Plast Surg 41:215–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Austad ED, Thomas SB, Pasyk K (1986) Tissue expansion: dividend or loan? Plast Reconstr Surg 78:63–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chen S-Z, Li J, Li X-Y, Xu L-S (2005) Effects of vacuum-assisted closure on wound microcirculation: an experimental study. Asian J Surg 28:211–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chen K-D, Li Y-S, Kim M, Li S, Yuan S, Chien S et al (1999) Mechanotransduction in response to shear stress roles of receptor tyrosine kinases, integrins, and Shc. J Biol Chem 274:18393–18400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Berman AT, Fabiano D, Bosacco SJ, Weiss AA (1990) Comparison between intermittent (spring-loaded) and continuous closed suction drainage of orthopedic wounds: a controlled clinical trial. Orthopedics 13:309–314Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fujiwara T, Nishimoto S, Ishise H, Sotsuka Y, Kawai K, Fukuda K et al (2013) Influence of continuous or intermittent negative pressure on bacterial proliferation potency in vitro. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 47:180–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shin SJ, Han D, Song H, Jang YJ, Park DH, Park MC (2014) Continuous high-pressure negative suction drain: new powerful tool for closed wound management: clinical experience. J Craniofac Surg 25:1427–1431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bonnema J, van Geel AN, Ligtenstein DA, Schmitz PI, Wiggers T (1997) A prospective randomized trial of high versus low vacuum drainage after axillary dissection for breast cancer. Am J Surg 173:76–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Borgquist O, Ingemansson R, Malmsjö M (2010) Wound edge microvascular blood flow during negative-pressure wound therapy: examining the effects of pressures from − 10 to − 175 mmHg. Plast Reconstr Surg 125:502–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Medical Cosmetology and Plastic SurgeryThe Third Hospital of Wuhan CityWuhan CityChina

Personalised recommendations