Advertisement

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

, Volume 42, Issue 6, pp 1499–1505 | Cite as

Degree of Acceptance of Breast Reconstruction and the Associated Factors Among a Population of Chinese Women with Breast Cancer

  • Fengqiu Gong
  • Liying Ding
  • Xiaojun Chen
  • Dianye Yao
  • Yaoye Wu
  • Lihong Xie
  • Qiuyi Ouyang
  • Ping Wang
  • Gang Niu
Original Article Breast Surgery
  • 80 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Breast cancer is one of the most common female “malignancies” reported worldwide in recent years. This study is aimed to understand the degree of acceptance of breast reconstruction among breast cancer patients in Chinese women and to explore the related factors.

Methods

Breast cancer patients were asked to fill in the demographic questionnaire, and consent for evaluation of Breast Reconstruction Acceptance Scale, Social Support Scale, and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-breast Quality of Life Instrument (FACT-B). The data were assessed using multivariate logistic regression analysis for the correlations between the degree of acceptance of breast reconstruction and age, marital status, family monthly income, quality of life, and social support.

Results

57.5% of 715 patients were not familiar with breast reconstruction. Results showed correlation with the degree of acceptance of breast reconstruction. Multivariate analysis indicated that age (41–50 years old, OR: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.08–0.76; > 50, OR: 0.05, 95% CI: 0.02–0.15), marital status (married, OR: 0.15, 95% CI: 0.05–0.43; divorced/widowed, OR: 0.11, 95% CI: 0.03–0.42), family income (3–10 thousand RMB, OR: 2.01, 95% CI: 1.08–3.76; > 10 thousand RMB, OR: 2.14, 95% CI: 1.05–4.37), quality of life (fair, OR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.39–0.91), and social support (excellent, OR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.30–0.83) were all correlated with the degree of acceptance of breast reconstruction.

Conclusion

Chinese breast cancer patients have a low degree of acceptance of breast reconstruction. The degree of acceptance was found to be correlated with age, marital status, family monthly income, quality of life, and social support.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Keywords

Breast cancer Breast reconstruction Degree of acceptance 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research Involving Human Participants

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Supplementary material

266_2018_1171_MOESM1_ESM.doc (34 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 33 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Yang L, Li LD, Chen YD et al (2006) Time trends, estimates and projects for breast cancer incidence and mortality in China. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi 28:438–440PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lee BT, Duggan MM, Keenan MT et al (2011) Commonwealth of Massachusetts Board of Registration in Medicine Expert Panel on immediate implant-based breast reconstruction following mastectomy for cancer: executive summary, June 2011. J Am Coll Surg 213:800–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Li W, Piao H, Qu D et al (2011) Assessment of quality-of-life influence of immediate or delayed autologous breast reconstructions. Cancer Res Prev Treat 2011:535–538Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Epstein S, Tran BN, Cohen JB et al (2018) Racial disparities in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: national trends in utilization from 2005 to 2014. Cancer 3:1–11Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mu L, Xin M, Luan J (2011) Valuation on and the current study status of breast reconstruction following breast cancer surgery. Chin J Breast Dis (Electronic Version) 2011:215–221Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhang X, Zhang P, Chen J (2010) Investigation of approval degree of breast conserving therapy and breast reconstruction of women with breast diseases. Chin J Bases Clin Gen Surg 2010:1240–1244Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhao R, Qiao Q, Yue Y et al (2003) The psychological impact of mastectomy on women with breast cancer. Chin J Plast Surg 19:294–296Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen H, Du Y, Jia G (2003) Factor analysis is applied in the test of family burden scale structure validity. Chin J Health Stat 20:93–94Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Xiao S (1994) The theoretical basis and application of social support rating scale. J Clin Psychiatry 2:98–100Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brady MJ, Cella DF, Mo F et al (1997) Reliability and validity of the functional assessment of cancer therapy-breast quality-of-life instrument. J Clin Oncol 15:974–986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wan CH, Zhang DM, Tang XL et al (2003) Introduction on measurement scale of quality of life for patients with breast cancer: Chinese version of FACT2B. Chin Mental Health J 17:298–300Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lee CN, Belkora J, Chang Y et al (2011) Are patients making high-quality decisions about breast reconstruction after mastectomy? Plast Reconstr Surg 127:18–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kruper L, Holt A, Xu XX et al (2011) Disparities in reconstruction rates after mastectomy: patterns of care and factors associated with the use of breast reconstruction in Southern California. Ann Surg Oncol 18:2158–2165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brennan ME, Spillane AJ (2013) Uptake and predictors of post-mastectomy reconstruction in women with breast malignancy–systematic review. Eur J Surg Oncol 39:527–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Levine SM, Levine A, Raghubir J, Levine JP (2012) A 10-year review of breast reconstruction in a university-based public hospital. Ann Plast Surg 69:376–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Charavel M, Bremond A, Courtial I (1997) Psychosocial profile of women seeking breast reconstruction. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 74:31–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhao R, Qiao Q, Yue Y et al (2003) The psychological impact of mastectomy on women with breast cancer. Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi 19:294–296PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jeevan R, Mennie JC, Mohanna PN et al (2016) National trends and regional variation in immediate breast reconstruction rates. Br J Surg 103:1147–1156CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fengqiu Gong
    • 1
  • Liying Ding
    • 1
  • Xiaojun Chen
    • 1
  • Dianye Yao
    • 1
  • Yaoye Wu
    • 1
  • Lihong Xie
    • 1
  • Qiuyi Ouyang
    • 1
  • Ping Wang
    • 1
  • Gang Niu
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Operating RoomThe First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen UniversityGuangzhouChina
  2. 2.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyThe First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen UniversityGuangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations