Advertisement

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

, Volume 41, Issue 1, pp 232–233 | Cite as

Rhinophyma: “Less is More” and “Old is Gold”

  • Marco MarcascianoEmail author
  • Nicola Vaia
  • Diego Ribuffo
  • Mauro Tarallo
  • Sergio Ciaschi
Letter to the Editor

Abstract

Rhinophyma is a deforming disorder of the nose and considered the most severe stage of rosacea. Since 1950, a large variety of surgical and non-surgical treatments have been adopted to treat it. From January 2014 to June 2016, we treated ten patients (average age: 58 years) affected by moderate (4) and severe (6) degrees of rhinophyma. A nasal skin decortication was performed with a loop-shaped electrotome (Valleylab E1560 15 x 12 mm) in order to excise the hypertrophic tissue and restore a pleasing appearance to the nose.

Level of Evidence V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the A3 online Instructions to Authors. www.springer.com/00266.

Keywords

Aesthetic Result Rosacea Severe Stage Carbon Dioxide Laser Pilosebaceous Unit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors certify that they have NO affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (MP4 21225 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Bogetti P, Boltri M, Spagnoli G, Dolcet M (2002) Surgical treatment of rhinophyma: a comparison of techniques. Aesthetic Plast Surg 26(1):57–60CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sadick H, Goepel B, Bersch C, Goessler U, Hoermann K, Riedel F (2008) Rhinophyma: diagnosis and treatment options for a disfiguring tumor of the nose. Ann Plast Surg 61(1):114–120CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Farina R (1950) Rhinophyma; plastic correction 1946. Plast Reconstr Surg 6(6):461–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clark DP, Hanke CW (1990) Electrosurgical treatment of rhinophyma. J Am Acad Dermatol 22(5):831–837CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Karacor-Altuntas Z, Dadaci M, Ince B, Altuntas M (2015) A new surgical technique of rhinophyma (gull-wing technique). J Craniofac Surg 26(1):e28–e30CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marco Marcasciano
    • 1
    Email author
  • Nicola Vaia
    • 1
  • Diego Ribuffo
    • 1
  • Mauro Tarallo
    • 1
  • Sergio Ciaschi
    • 1
  1. 1.Plastic Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery “P Valdoni”Sapienza UniversityRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations