Social modulation of individual differences in dance communication in honey bees
Group-living animals must constantly integrate and respond to information from other individuals within the group. The degree to which consistent inter-individual behavioural differences are influenced by social cues in such groups is largely unanswered. We used the honey bee waggle dance as an experimental paradigm to explore this question. Honey bee foragers use the waggle dance behaviour to communicate information about food sources in the environment to their nest mates. This recruitment process incorporates information about the food reward, the colony food stores and the environmental food availability and plays a major role in ensuring efficient exploitation of the food sources available to the colony. We first observed individual foragers visiting the same food source and quantified the probability and intensity of their dance activity. We found that there are consistent inter-individual differences in both measures of dance activity within a forager group. Next, we removed foragers and observed that this led to a significant increase in the average dance activity of some foragers. The individuals which increased their dance activity were the ones which were more active before the removal. Finally, we allowed recruits to join the foragers at the food source, which had a strong inhibitory effect on the dance activity of all the individual foragers. Our study shows that a complex interplay between individual behavioural differences and social interactions drives the dance communication needed to effectively organise the colony’s collective foraging behaviour.
Very little is known about the effect of social cues and signals on consistent inter-individual differences in behaviour amongst workers in the same colony in social insects. We studied this in the recruitment behaviour of honey bee foragers, the dance communication. Foragers visiting the same food source consistently differed in their dance activity, suggesting that there were strong inter-individual differences in the perception of the food reward. We then changed the social cues experienced by the foragers by either removing some of the foragers or allowing recruits to forage at the same food source. We found that the removal of some foragers had an individual specific effect, whereas the presence of all recruits affected all foragers. Our results show that the regulation of foraging in honey bees involves the social modulation of consistent differences in recruitment activity.
KeywordsSocial insects Waggle dance Repeatability of behaviour Foragers Response thresholds Social cues
We would like to thank Ravi Kumar Boyapati, Abhishek Anand, Hinal Kharva and other student interns for their help with the behavioural experiments. We would also like to thank Sruthi Unnikrishnan for providing valuable feedback on the manuscript. E.A.G. was supported by a fellowship from National Centre for Biological Sciences—Tata Institute of Fundamental Research; A.B. was supported by National Centre for Biological Sciences—Tata Institute of Fundamental Research institutional funds No. 12P4167.
Compliance with ethical standards
All applicable international, national and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.
- Al-Ghamdi AA, Adgaba N, Tadesse Y et al (2017) Comparative study on the dynamics and performances of Apis mellifera jemenitica and imported hybrid honeybee colonies in southwestern Saudi Arabia. Saudi J Biol Sci 24:1086–1093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2017.01.008 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Aplin LM, Firth JA, Farine DR, Voelkl B, Crates RA, Culina A, Garroway CJ, Hinde CA, Kidd LR, Psorakis I, Milligan ND, Radersma R, Verhelst BL, Sheldon BC (2015) Consistent individual differences in the social phenotypes of wild great tits, Parus major. Anim Behav 108:117–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.07.016 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Charbonneau D, Blonder B, Dornhaus A (2013) Social insects: a model system for network dynamics. In: Understanding Complex Systems Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 217–244Google Scholar
- Claus O. Wilke (2018) cowplot: streamlined plot theme and plot annotations for “ggplot2”. R package version 0.9.3. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=cowplot. Accessed 20 July 2017
- Cook CN, Mosqueiro T, Brent CS, Ozturk C, Gadau J, Pinter-Wollman N, Smith BH (2018) Individual differences in learning and biogenic amine levels influence the behavioural division between foraging honeybee scouts and recruits. J Anim Ecol 88:236. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12911 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- von Frisch K (1967) The dance language and orientation of bees. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- George E, Brockmann A (2018) Dataset for “Social regulation of individual differences in communication within honey bee foraging groups”. https://doi.org/10.17632/c85d3wczbs.2
- Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (2009) The superorganism. W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.Google Scholar
- Perry CJ, Barron AB (2013) Neural mechanisms of reward in insects. Annu Rev Entomol 58:543–562. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-120811-153631 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, et al (2018) Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. URL https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/nlme/nlme.pdf
- R Core Team (2017) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. https://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 02 July 2017
- RStudio Team (2016) RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio, Inc., Boston. http://www.rstudio.com/. Accessed 02 July 2017
- Seeley TD (1995) The wisdom of the hive. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Stephens DW, Brown JS, Ydenberg RC (2007) Foraging: Behavior and Ecology. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- Wickham H (2016) Ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis, 2nd edn. Springer International Publishing,Google Scholar