Helpers improve fledgling body condition in bigger broods of cooperatively breeding African pygmy falcon
Universal predictions on the occurrence of cooperative breeding are still elusive. This breeding strategy is strongly linked to phylogeny; therefore, studies on species within groups where cooperative breeding is more prevalent could improve our understanding. Many diurnal raptors exhibit cooperative breeding, although occurrence rates are mostly based on anecdotal observations at nests. Here, we present a detailed study of the reproductive output and social organisation of the African pygmy falcon. Using data from six breeding seasons, we found helpers at 19% of nests. Helper presence had a positive effect on the body condition of the chicks as brood size increased, likely due to their contribution to feeding the chicks. Cooperative breeding groups were more likely to occur following years of higher reproductive output. Indeed, most of the helpers (77%) were non-dispersed offspring from the previous year, whereas the other helpers were immigrant adults (23%). We identified groups that included retained offspring (46%), immigrant adults (27%) or both types of helpers (27%). Breeding groups were also described as multi-male (65%), multi-female (26%) and multi-male-female (9%). Pygmy falcon group composition proved to be highly variable and diverse compared to other raptor species, in which helpers are generally unrelated adult males, showing that selection pressures leading to group formation in diurnal raptors may be more diverse than previously thought.
Cooperative breeding occurs when more than two individuals contribute to raising a brood of young. It occurs in approximately 9% of bird species and it is particularly frequent in diurnal raptors. We studied the breeding performance and social organisation of the African pygmy falcon and found that they form breeding groups at 19% of the nests. These breeding groups included the breeding pair plus helpers that are either males or females. Helpers were also either adult immigrants or retained offspring. We also found that groups produced healthier fledglings than pairs and that groups are more likely to occur following years with high fledgling success. With this work, we expand the number of studies on raptor cooperative breeding and explore the fitness advantages of group breeding in this species as well as the mechanisms behind group formation.
KeywordsRaptor breeding Avian polyandry Group formation Fledgling production Natal philopatry Delayed dispersal
We thank the Oppenheimer family, Tswalu Foundation and Tswalu Kalahari for permitting us to conduct research on their property. We thank also Anna Gamero for comments on previous versions of this manuscript and Arjun Amar for help with statistical analyses. Thanks to Stephen Pruett-Jones, Christie Riehl and Jim Bednarz for their review and helpful suggestions to improve the manuscript.
The field work was funded by the NRF-DST Centre of Excellence of the FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology and by a Tswalu Foundation grant. RLT was initially supported by the Academy of Finland (grant no. 138049) and the University of Turku Collegium for Science and Technology grant for this work.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
The project conformed to the legal requirements of South Africa and has received research FAUNA permits from the Northern Cape Province’s Department of Environment and Nature Conservation, and an ethics approval from the Science Animal Ethics Committee (SFAEC) of the University of Cape Town, South Africa.
- Bertran J, Margalida A (2002) Social organization of a trio of bearded vultures (Gypaetus barbatus): sexual and parental roles. J Raptor Res 36:66–70Google Scholar
- Brown JL, Brown ER (1981) Kin selection and individual fitness in babblers. In: Alexander RD, Tinkle DW (eds) Natural selection and social behavior. Chiron, New York, pp 244–256Google Scholar
- Covas R and du Plessis MA (2005) The effect of helpers on artificially increased brood size in sociable weavers (Philetairus socius). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 57:631–636Google Scholar
- Covas R, Du Plessis MA and Doutrelant C (2008) Helpers in colonial cooperatively breeding sociable weavers Philetairus socius contribute to buffer the effects of adverse breeding conditions. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:103–112Google Scholar
- Emlen ST (1991) Evolution of cooperative breeding in birds and mammals. In: Krebs R, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, pp 301–335Google Scholar
- Emlen ST and Wrege PH (1991) Breeding biology of White-fronted Bee-eaters at Nakuru: The influence of helpers on breeder fitness. J Anim Ecol 60:309–326Google Scholar
- Faaborg J (1986) Reproductive success and survivorship of the Galapagos hawk Buteo galapagoensis: potential costs and benefits of cooperative polyandry. Ibis 128:337–347. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.1986.tb02684.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Faaborg J, Vries T, Patterson CB, Griffin CR (1980) Preliminary observations on the occurrence and evolution of polyandry in the Galapagos hawk (Buteo galapagoensis). Auk 97:581–590Google Scholar
- Garcelon DK, Slater GL, Danilson CD, Helm RC (1995) Cooperative nesting by a trio of bald eagles. J Raptor Res 29:210–213Google Scholar
- Hamilton W (1964) The genetical evolution of social behaviour. J Theor Biol 7:1–52Google Scholar
- Heinsohn R and Cockburn A (1994) Helping is costly to young birds in cooperatively breeding White-winged Choughs. Proc R Soc B 256:293–298Google Scholar
- Krochuk BA, Bolopo D, Lowney A, Meyers PR, Spottiswoode CN, Raman RMG, Thomson RL (2018) Why defaecate on your doorstep? Investigating an unusual behaviour in Africa’s smallest falcon. Ostrich (published online. https://doi.org/10.2989/00306525.2018.1529001)
- Malan G (1998) Solitary and social hunting in pale chanting goshawk (Melierax canorus) families: why use both strategies? J Raptor Res 32:195–201Google Scholar
- Malan G, Crowe TM, Biggs R, Herholdt JJ (1997) The social system of the pale chanting goshawk Melierax canorus; monogamy v polyandry and delayed dispersal. Ibis 139:313–321. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.1997.tb04630.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Moreno J, Merino S, Sanz JJ, Arriero E, Morales J, Tomás G (2005) Nestling cell-mediated immune response, body mass and hatching date as predictors of local recruitment in the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca. J Avian Biol 36:251–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0908-8857.2005.03413.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Parker JW, Ports M (1982) Helping at the nest by yearling Mississippi kites. J Raptor Res 16:14–17Google Scholar
- Riehl C (2013) Evolutionary routes to non-kin cooperative breeding in birds. Phil Trans R Soc B 280:20132245Google Scholar
- Tella JL (1993) Polyandrous trios in a population of Egyptian vultures. J Raptor Res 27:119–120Google Scholar
- Thomsett S (1991) Polyandrous pygmy falcons? Gabar 6:73Google Scholar