Kinship influences social bonds among male southern Australian bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops cf. australis)
Male mammals employ a wide variety of mating strategies in order to increase their reproductive success, which in turn influence their social behavior. In some populations of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops spp.), males cooperate in small groups or alliances to gain access to females for mating. However, the occurrence of these male cooperative groups has been predicted to occur only under certain social and ecological conditions, driven by factors such as differences in population density, operational sex ratio, and sexual size dimorphism. Here, we used generalized affiliation indices, social network techniques, and maternally and bi-parentally inherited genetic markers to investigate the affiliation patterns and genetic relatedness among male southern Australian bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops cf. australis) in a small embayment in South Australia. Photo-identification data and biopsy samples were collected in Coffin Bay from 2013 to 2015 through systematic boat-based surveys. We found that highly sighted male dolphins formed 12 social clusters composed of two to five individuals. Genetic analyses revealed that general male affiliation patterns were significantly correlated with mtDNA haplotype sharing. In addition, preferred affiliates showed significantly higher levels of genetic relatedness compared to casual and avoided male pairs. Our results corroborate theoretical expectations for the formation of social bonds in small delphinids and suggest that a high density of dolphins, with an expected skewed operational sex ratio and no apparent sexual size dimorphism, is likely to have favored the formation of strong male affiliations. In addition, the availability of genetic relatives within the population may have favored male affiliations based on kinship relationships.
Male bottlenose dolphins use different strategies to gain access to females, from single roving individuals, pairs or trios in alliances, to stable mixed-sex groups. Moreover, the role of kinship in the formation of male social bonds also varies within and among populations. This variability has been attributed to differences in ecological and intrinsic factors. Here, we studied the affiliation patterns and genetic relatedness in southern Australian bottlenose dolphins and demonstrated that kinship plays an important role in the formation of close male social ties. Furthermore, the results corroborate previous findings about the factors that contribute to the formation of male social bonds in these animals.
KeywordsBottlenose dolphins Tursiops cf. australis Male affiliations Kinship Generalized affiliation indices
We thank all the volunteers who helped us in collecting data in the field, particularly K. Indeck and F. Vivier for their support during multiple fieldwork seasons. M. Sasaki and E. Pratt provided guidance with laboratory work. Special acknowledgements to C. Castilla for her help in formatting the manuscript. We would also like to thank the referees that have highly improved the quality of this manuscript.
This work was partially supported by Flinders University, Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment (ANZ and Equity Trustees), Nature Foundation SA, Inc., and Lirabenda Research Endowment of the Field Naturalists Society of South Australia. The first author was sponsored by a BecasChile PhD Scholarship.
Compliance with ethical standards
All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of Flinders University Animal Welfare Committee, approval number E310 and under permits to undertake scientific research: E26171-1, E26171-2, E26171-3, and MR00056-1 from the Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources (DEWNR), South Australia, and under S115 ministerial exemptions (MEs: 9902601, 9902660, 9902714, and 9902779) from Primary Industries Resources South Australia (PIRSA).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Amos B, Hoelzel A (1991) Long-term preservation of whale skin for DNA analysis. Genetic ecology of whales and dolphins. Rep Int Whal Commn Special Issue 13:99–103Google Scholar
- Baker CS, Perry A, Bannister JL, Weinrich MT, Abernethy RB, Calambokidis J, Lien J, Lambertsen RH, Ramírez JU, Vasquez O (1993) Abundant mitochondrial DNA variation and world-wide population structure in humpback whales. P Natl Acad Sci USA 90:8239–8243. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.90.17.8239 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Borgatti S (2002) NetDraw software for network visualization. Analytic Technologies, Lexington, KYGoogle Scholar
- Caro TM (1994) Cheetahs of the Serengeti Plains: group living in an asocial species. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- Caro TM, Collins DA (1987) Male cheetah social organization and territoriality. Ethology 74:52–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1987.tb00921.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Connor RC, Smolker RA, Richards AF (1992a) Coalitions and alliances in humans and other animals. In: Harcourt A, de Waal FBM (eds) Dolphin alliances and coalitions. Oxford Science Publications, New York, pp 415–443Google Scholar
- Connor RC, Wells RS, Mann J, Read AJ (2000a) The bottlenose dolphin: social relationships in a fission-fusion society. In: Mann J, Connor RC, Tyack PL, Whitehead H (eds) Cetacean societies: field studies of dolphins and whales. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 91–126Google Scholar
- Connor RC, Read AJ, Wrangham R (2000b) Male reproductive strategies and social bonds. In: Mann J, Connor RC, Tyack PL, Whitehead H (eds) Cetacean societies: field studies of dolphins and whales. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 247–269Google Scholar
- Diaz-Aguirre F (2017) Socio-genetic structure of southern Australian bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops cf. australis) in a South Australian embayment. PhD thesis, Flinders University, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
- Frère CH, Krützen M, Mann J, Watson-Capps JJ, Tsai YJ, Patterson EM, Connor R, Bejder L, Sherwin WB (2010) Home range overlap, matrilineal and biparental kinship drive female associations in bottlenose dolphins. Anim Behav 80:481–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.06.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gailey G, Karczmarski L (2012) DISCOVERY: photo-identification data-management system for individually recognizable animals, http://www.cetaecoresearch.com/research-software-discovery.html
- Gilson A, Syvanen M, Levine K, Banks J (1998) Deer gender determination by polymerase chain reaction: validation study and application to tissues, bloodstains, and hair forensic samples from California. Calif Fish Game 84:159–169Google Scholar
- Goodall J (1986) The chimpanzees of Gombe: patterns of behavior. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
- Harcourt A, de Waal FBM (eds) (1992) Coalitions and alliances in humans and other animals. Oxford Science Publications, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Holm S (1979) A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat 6:65–70Google Scholar
- Krützen M, Barre LM, Möller LM, Heithaus MR, Simms C, Sherwin WB (2002) A biopsy system for small cetaceans: darting success and wound healing in Tursiops spp. Mar Mammal Sci 18:863–878. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2002.tb01078.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Krützen M, Barré LM, Connor RC, Mann J, Sherwin WB (2004a) “O father: where art thou?”—paternity assessment in an open fission-fusion society of wild bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops sp.) in Shark Bay, Western Australia. Mol Ecol 13:1975–1990. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02192.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Krützen M, Sherwin WB, Berggren P, Gales N (2004b) Population structure in an inshore cetacean revealed by microsatellite and mtDNA analysis: bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops sp.) in Shark Bay, Western Australia. Mar Mammal Sci 20:28–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2004.tb01139.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McSweeney DJ, Baird RW, Mahaffy SD (2007) Site fidelity, associations, and movements of Cuvier’s (Ziphius cavirostris) and Blainville’s (Mesoplodon densirostris) beaked whales off the island of Hawai’i. Mar Mammal Sci 23:666–687. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2007.00135.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Möller LM, Beheregaray LB (2001) Coastal bottlenose dolphins from South-Eastern Australia are Tursiops aduncus according to sequences of the mitochondrial DNA control region. Mar Mammal Sci 17:249–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2001.tb01269.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Owen ECG (2003) The reproductive and ecological functions of the pair-bond between allied, adult male bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops truncatus, in Sarasota Bay, Florida. PhD thesis, University of California, Santa CruzGoogle Scholar
- Pratt EAL, Beheregaray LB, Bilgmann K, Zanardo N, Diaz-Aguirre F, Möller LM (2018) Hierarchical metapopulation structure in a highly mobile marine predator: the southern Australian coastal bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops cf. australis). Conserv Genet 19:637–654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-017-1043-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 86:248–249. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a111573 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Saunders B (2012) Shores and shallows of Coffin Bay. An identification guide. Australian Printing Specialists, Torrensville, SAGoogle Scholar
- Sunnucks P, Hales DF (1996) Numerous transposed sequences of mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I-II in aphids of the genus Sitobion (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Mol Biol Evol 13:510–524. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025612 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- R Development Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, http://www.R-project.org
- Wilson DRB (1995) The ecology of bottlenose dolphins in the Moray Firth, Scotland: a population at the northern extreme of the species’ range. PhD thesis, University of AberdeenGoogle Scholar
- Würsig B, Jefferson TA (1990) Methods of photo-identification for small cetaceans. International Whaling Commission, Cambridge, EnglandGoogle Scholar