Bringing down the house: male widow spiders reduce the webs of aggressive females more
Abstract
Theory suggests that males should adjust courtship in response to a variety of factors, including female quality, the risk of male-male competition, and often in spiders, the risk of sexual cannibalism. Male black widow spiders demonstrate a behavior during courtship whereby they tear down and bundle a female’s web in addition to providing other vibratory and contact sexual signals. This web reduction has been hypothesized to play a role in all three factors (sexual signaling, competition reduction, and cannibalism reduction), but rarely are these tested together. Here, we test these hypotheses by conducting mating trials using the western black widow (Latrodectus hesperus) and measuring both male and female quality and behavior. Our results indicate that amount of web reduction is best predicted by female aggression, and not aspects of either male or female quality (e.g., body mass), or by the potential for the web to attract other males (e.g., web mass). Yet, actual mating success was best predicted by the proportion of web reduced. Furthermore, there was no consistent among-individual variation in either reduction behavior or male success, indicating that all variation in both measures was due to plasticity and/or other unaccounted-for male or female traits. Collectively, we conclude that the primary function of web reduction behavior is to reduce female aggression and thus the risk of sexual cannibalism, and that any other functions such as signaling and reducing male-male competition have relatively lower importance.
Significance statement
Male widow spiders must account for female aggression, quality, and male-male competition when courting females. During courtship, males will reduce a female’s web by tearing it down and bundling the silk, which may aid in all three of these issues. Our results demonstrate that males reduce the webs of aggressive females more, and less so to potentially reduce competition from other males or in response to female quality. Ultimate mating success was dictated by how much a male reduced the web of a given female. Finally, males showed no among-individual variation in reduction behavior, indicating that the extensive variation in this behavior is due solely to plasticity in response to the female.
Keywords
Courtship behavior Web reduction Sexual cannibalism Mate choice LatrodectusNotes
Acknowledgements
Thanks to Cameron Jones for comments on an early version of this manuscript.
Author contributions
ND and AD designed the study. ND conducted the experiment and data processing in conjunction with CB and CS. ND conducted the statistical analysis, and wrote the initial draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the final editing of the manuscript.
Funding information
Funding was provided by a University of Arizona Postdoctoral Excellence in Research and Teaching Fellowship (NIH # 5K12GM000708-17) awarded to ND and by the NSF (grant no. IOS-1455983 to AD).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Widow spiders are not subject to any ethical protocals in the United States.
References
- Akaike H (1987) Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika 52:317–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Anava A, Lubin Y (1993) Presence of gender cues in the web of a widow spider, Latrodectus revivensis, and a description of courtship behaviour. Bull Br Arachnol Soc 9:119–122Google Scholar
- Andersson M, Simmons LW (2006) Sexual selection and mate choice. Trends Ecol Evol 21:296–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Andrade MC (2003) Risky mate search and male self-sacrifice in redback spiders. Behav Ecol 14:531–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Arnqvist G, Henriksson S (1997) Sexual cannibalism in the fishing spider and a model for the evolution of sexual cannibalism based on genetic constraints. Evol Ecol 11:255–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Avigliano E, Scardamaglia RC, Gabelli FM, Pompilio L (2016) Males choose to keep their heads: preference for lower risk females in a praying mantid. Behav Process 129:80–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bartoń K (2013) MuMIn: multi-model inference. R package version 1.9. The Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN), Vienna, p 13Google Scholar
- Baruffaldi L, Andrade MC (2015) Contact pheromones mediate male preference in black widow spiders: avoidance of hungry sexual cannibals? Anim Behav 102:25–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2013) lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1Google Scholar
- Berning AW, Gadd RD, Sweeney K, MacDonald L, Eng RY, Hess ZL, Pruitt JN (2012) Sexual cannibalism is associated with female behavioural type, hunger state and increased hatching success. Anim Behav 84:715–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Blackledge TA, Zevenbergen JM (2007) Condition-dependent spider web architecture in the western black widow. Anim Behav 73:855–864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bonduriansky R (2001) The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence. Biol Rev 76:305–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Breene RG, Sweet MH (1985) Evidence of insemination of multiple females by the male black widow spider, Latrodectus mactans (Araneae, Theridiidae). J Arachnol:331–335Google Scholar
- Burnham K, Anderson D (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. SpringerGoogle Scholar
- Byrne PG, Rice WR (2006) Evidence for adaptive male mate choice in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. Proc R Soc B 273:917–922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- DeWitt TJ, Sih A, Wilson DS (1998) Costs and limits of phenotypic plasticity. Trends Ecol Evol 13:77–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dingemanse NJ, Kazem AJ, Réale D, Wright J (2010) Behavioural reaction norms: animal personality meets individual plasticity. Trends Ecol Evol 25:81–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- DiRienzo N, Aonuma H (2017) Individual differences are consistent across changes in mating status and mediated by biogenic amines. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 71:118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- DiRienzo N, Aonuma H (2018) Plasticity in extended phenotype increases offspring defence despite individual variation in web structure and behaviour. Anim Behav 138:9–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- DiRienzo N, Montiglio P-O (2016a) Linking consistent individual differences in web structure and behavior in black widow spiders. Behav Ecol 27:1424–1431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- DiRienzo N, Montiglio PO (2016b) The contribution of developmental experience vs. condition to life history, trait variation and individual differences. J Anim Ecol 85:915–926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- DiRienzo N, Bradley CT, Smith CA, Dornhaus A (2018) Data From: Bringing down the house: male widow spiders reduce the webs of aggressive females more. Behav Ecol Socibiol. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.tp7637c
- Edward DA, Chapman T (2011) The evolution and significance of male mate choice. Trends Ecol Evol 26:647–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Elgar MA (1991) Sexual cannibalism, size dimorphism, and courtship behavior in orb-weaving spiders (Araneidae). Evolution 45:444–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Emlen ST, Oring LW (1977) Ecology, sexual selection, and evolution of mating systems. Science 197:215–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gaskett AC, Herberstein ME, Downes BJ, Elgar MA (2004) Changes in male mate choice in a sexually cannibalistic orb-web spider (Araneae: Araneidae). Behaviour 141:1197–1210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Harari AR, Ziv M, Lubin Y (2009) Conflict or cooperation in the courtship display of the white widow spider. J Arachnol 37:254–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Harrison XA (2014) Using observation-level random effects to model overdispersion in count data in ecology and evolution. PeerJ 2:e616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Head G (1995) Selection on fecundity and variation in the degree of sexual size dimorphism among spider species (class Araneae). Evolution 49:776–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Herberstein ME, Wignall AE, Hebets E, Schneider JM (2014) Dangerous mating systems: signal complexity, signal content and neural capacity in spiders. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 46:509–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Johnson JC, Sih A (2005) Precopulatory sexual cannibalism in fishing spiders (Dolomedes triton): a role for behavioral syndromes. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 58:390–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Johnson JC, Trubl P, Blackmore V, Miles L (2011) Male black widows court well-fed females more than starved females: silken cues indicate sexual cannibalism risk. Anim Behav 82:383–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kasumovic MM, Andrade MC (2004) Discrimination of airborne pheromones by mate-searching male western black widow spiders (Latrodectus hesperus): species-and population-specific responses. Can J Zool 82:1027–1034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Landolfa M, Barth F (1996) Vibrations in the orb web of the spider Nephila clavipes: cues for discrimination and orientation. J Comp Physiol A 179:493–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lubin YD (1986) Courtship and alternative mating tactics in a social spider. J Arachnol:239–257Google Scholar
- MacLeod EC, Andrade MC (2014) Strong, convergent male mate choice along two preference axes in field populations of black widow spiders. Anim Behav 89:163–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Møller AP, Alatalo RV (1999) Good-genes effects in sexual selection. Proc R Soc B 266:85–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Montiglio P-O, DiRienzo N (2016) There’s no place like home: the contribution of direct and extended phenotypes on the expression of spider aggressiveness. Behav Ecol:arw094Google Scholar
- Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H (2010) Repeatability for Gaussian and non-Gaussian data: a practical guide for biologists. Biol Rev 85:935–956PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H (2013) A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods Ecol Evol 4:133–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Persons MH, Uetz GW (2005) Sexual cannibalism and mate choice decisions in wolf spiders: influence of male size and secondary sexual characters. Anim Behav 69:83–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- R Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. In. Available from CRAN sitesGoogle Scholar
- Réale D, Reader SM, Sol D, McDougall PT, Dingemanse NJ (2007) Integrating animal temperament within ecology and evolution. Biol Rev 82:291–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Richards SA (2005) Testing ecological theory using the information-theoretic approach: examples and cautionary results. Ecology 86:2805–2814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ross K, Smith RL (1979) Aspects of the courtship behavior of the black widow spider, Latrodectus hesperus (Araneae: Theridiidae), with evidence for the existence of a contact sex pheromone. J Arachnol:69–77Google Scholar
- Rovner JS (1968) Territoriality in the sheet-web spider Linyphia triangularis (Clerck)(Araneae, Linyphiidae). Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 25:232–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rubenstein DI (1987) Alternative reproductive tactics in the spider Meta segmentata. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 20:229–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schielzeth H, Nakagawa S (2011) rptR: repeatability for Gaussian and non-Gaussian data. R package version 0.6 404:r36Google Scholar
- Scott C, Vibert S, Gries G (2012) Evidence that web reduction by western black widow males functions in sexual communication. Can Entomol 144:672–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Scott C, Kirk D, McCann S, Gries G (2015) Web reduction by courting male black widows renders pheromone-emitting females’ webs less attractive to rival males. Anim Behav 107:71–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Scott C, Gerak C, McCann S, Gries G (2017) The role of silk in courtship and chemical communication of the false widow spider, Steatoda grossa (Araneae: Theridiidae). Ethology:1–7Google Scholar
- Sih A, Bell A, Johnson JC (2004) Behavioral syndromes: an ecological and evolutionary overview. Trends Ecol Evol 19:372–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Van Helsdingen P (1965) Sexual behaviour of Lepthyphantes leprosus (Ohlert)(Araneida, Linyphiidae), with notes on the function of the genital organs. Zoologische Mededelingen 41:15–42Google Scholar
- Vibert S, Scott C, Gries G (2014) A meal or a male: the ‘whispers’ of black widow males do not trigger a predatory response in females. Front Zool 11(1):4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wagenmakers E-J, Farrell S (2004) AIC model selection using Akaike weights. Psychon Bull Rev 11:192–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Watanabe T (2000) Web tuning of an orb-web spider, Octonoba sybotides, regulates prey-catching behaviour. Proc R Soc B 267:565–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Watson PJ (1986) Transmission of a female sex pheromone thwarted by males in the spider Linyphia litigiosa (Linyphiidae). Science 233:219–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wise DH (1979) Effects of an experimental increase in prey abundance upon the reproductive rates of two orb-weaving spider species (Araneae: Araneidae). Oecologia 41:289–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zahavi A (1975) Mate selection—a selection for a handicap. J Theor Biol 53:205–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar