The social functions of complex vocal sequences in wild geladas
Several studies show that highly social taxa produce relatively more complex vocalizations. Yet, very few of these cases have demonstrated the function that vocal complexity plays within a highly social setting. Here, we assess potential functions of vocal complexity in male geladas (Theropithecus gelada) living in the Simien Mountains National Park, Ethiopia. Geladas are known for both their diverse vocalizations (routinely produced in long sequences) and their complex social structure (extremely large groups and long-term male-female bonds). We tested whether sequence complexity (i.e., including elaborate “derived” calls that are unique to geladas and absent in closely related taxa) or size (i.e., number of calls) may function (1) to counteract the challenges of living in a large group (overcoming conspecific noise and crowding, maintaining cohesion), or (2) to maintain social bonds with females. We found that an increase in conspecific noise contributed to the use of longer and more complex sequences. However, behavioral contexts in which the risk of separation was highest (i.e., traveling) were associated with only longer (but not more complex) sequences. We also found that sequence complexity (but not size) was associated with male-female bonding as complex call sequences were produced primarily when males were in close proximity to and approached females, and they led to males being groomed by females. Together, these findings suggest that, while a noisy backdrop of conspecific vocalizations might contribute to vocal complexity, the potential driver of gelada vocal complexity is the need to maintain cross-sex bonds.
Why do some animals make many diverse sounds while others make only a few simple sounds? Broad comparisons suggest that sociality may be important as more social species (e.g., those with large group size and social bonding) tend to make more types of sounds. Yet, it remains unclear why gregarious species need an expanded call repertoire. Here, we take advantage of previous work on a highly social primate (geladas) that identified several complex vocalizations that contribute to gelada’s expanded vocal repertoire. To better understand why geladas evolved an expanded set of calls, we focus on the context where complex calls are produced and the responses those calls elicit. We found that the potential driver of the use of more call types is the need to maintain cross-sex bonds, suggesting an important role for male-female bonds in the evolution of vocal complexity.
KeywordsSocial complexity Vocal complexity Conspecific noise Communication Social bonding Primate
We thank the Ethiopian Wildlife Conservation Authority (EWCA) as well as the wardens and staff of the Simien Mountain National Park for permission and support in conduction research on geladas. We thank all the members of the University of Michigan Gelada Research Project (UMGRP) for assistance in data collection and valuable insight on analyses and interpretation. This manuscript was improved by helpful comments from Susanne Shultz and two anonymous reviewers.
MLG was supported by grants from the National Geographic Society (9122-12, W304-14), the Leakey Foundation, University of Michigan, and Petridish (primary supporter, John Allen). ETJ was supported by grants from the National Science Foundation (NSF-1340911) and the Leakey Foundation. UMGRP was supported by the Wildlife Conservation Society (SSF 67250), the National Geographic Society (8100-06), the Leakey Foundation, the National Science Foundation (BCS-0715179, BCS-0962118, IOS-1255974), and the University of Michigan.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Research was approved by the University Committee on Use and Care of Animals at the University of Michigan and adhered to the laws and guidelines of Ethiopia.
- Aich H, Moos-Heilen R, Zimmermann E (1990) Vocalizations of adult gelada baboons (Theropithecus gelada): acoustic structure and behavioural context. Folia Primatol 55:109–132. https://doi.org/10.1159/000156508
- Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour 49:227–267. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853974X00534
- Altmann G (1980) Prolegomena to Menzerath’s law. Glottometrika 2:1–10Google Scholar
- Baker CM (1988) Vocalizations of captive water mongooses, Atilax paludinosus. Z Saugetierkd 53:83–91Google Scholar
- Blumstein DT, Armitage KB (1997) Does sociality drive the evolution of communicative complexity? A comparative test with ground-dwelling sciurid alarm calls. Am Nat 150:179–200. https://doi.org/10.1086/286062
- Bronkhorst AW (2000) The cocktail party phenomenon: a review of research on speech intelligibility in multiple-talker conditions. Acta Acust United AC 86:117–128Google Scholar
- Brumm H, Voss K, Köllmer I, Todt D (2004) Acoustic communication in noise: regulation of call characteristics in a New World monkey. J Exp Biol 207:443–448. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.00768
- Catchpole CK, Slater PJB (2003) Bird song: biological themes and variations. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM (1997) Reconciliatory grunts by dominant female baboons influence victims’ behaviour. Anim Behav 54:409–418. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1996.0438
- Cowlishaw G (1996) Sexual selection and information content in gibbon song bouts. Ethology 102:272–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1996.tb01125.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dunbar RIM (1998) Grooming, gossip, and the evolution of language. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Dunbar RIM (2003) The social brain: mind, language, and society in evolutionary perspective. Annu Rev Anthropol 32:163–181. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.32.061002.093158 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dunbar RIM, Dunbar P (1975) Social dynamics of gelada baboons. Kager, BaselGoogle Scholar
- Ey E, Rahn C, Hammerschmidt K, Fischer J (2009) Wild female olive baboons adapt their grunt vocalizations to environmental conditions. Ethology 115:493–503. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2009.01638.x
- Gil D, Graves JA, Slater PJB (1999) Seasonal patterns of singing in the willow warbler: evidence against the fertility announcement hypothesis. Anim Behav 58:995–1000. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1999.1211
- Lack D (1968) Ecological adaptations for breeding in birds. Chapman and Hall, Methuen, MAGoogle Scholar
- Leighton GM (2017) Cooperative breeding influences the number and type of vocalizations in avian lineages. Proc R Soc B 284:20171508. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.1508
- Manser MB, Jansen DAWAM, Graw B, Hollén LI, Bousquet CAH, Furrer RD, Le Roux A (2014) Vocal complexity in meerkats and other mongoose species. Adv Stud Behav 46:281–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800286-5.00006-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Menzerath P (1954) Die Architektonik des deutschen Wortschatzes. Dümmler, BonnGoogle Scholar
- Mitani JC (1988) Male gibbon (Hylobates agilis) singing behavior: natural history, song variations and function. Ethology 79:177–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1988.tb00710.x
- Palombit RA, Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM (1999) Male grunts as mediators of social interaction with females in wild chacma baboons (Papio cynocephalus ursinus). Behaviour 136:221–242. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853999501298
- Pappano DJ (2013) The reproductive trajectories of bachelor geladas. PhD Dissertation, University of MichiganGoogle Scholar
- Richman B (1976) Some vocal distinctive features used by gelada monkeys. J Acoust Soc Am 60:718–724. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.381144
- Richman B (1987) Rhythm and melody in gelada vocal exchanges. Primates 28:199–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02382570
- Searcy WA, Andersson M (1986) Sexual selection and the evolution of song. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 17:507–533. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.17.110186.002451 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tomaszycki ML, Adkins-Regan E (2006) Is male song quality important in maintaining pair bonds? Behaviour 143:549–567. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853906776759529
- Wilkinson GS (2003) Social and vocal complexity in bats. In: de Waal FBM, Tyack PL (eds) Animal social complexity: intelligence, culture, and individualized societies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 322–341Google Scholar