Advertisement

Do predators modify context-dependent dispersal of red squirrels?

  • Vesa Selonen
  • Karen Fey
  • Suvi Hämäläinen
  • Tytti Turkia
  • Erkki Korpimäki
Original Article

Abstract

Natal dispersal, the one-way movement between birth site and first breeding site, is an important determinant of species gene-flow and invasion potential. While dispersing in unfamiliar habitat, individuals may adjust their movement based on possible costs and benefits of moving, termed context-dependent dispersal. The role of factors, such as population density or spatial organisation of habitats, is well studied in the departure, transfer and settlement phases of dispersal. However, the role of predators for context-dependent dispersal remains less studied, particularly for the transfer phase and settlement phase of natal dispersal. We studied natal dispersal of radio-collared Eurasian red squirrels, Sciurus vulgaris, in relation to nest site locations of their main predator, the goshawk, Accipiter gentilis, in Finland. The locations of nest sites of goshawk had no influence on movement made during the transfer phase or on the location of settlement sites of juvenile red squirrels. Limited data on squirrel response to indices of predator presence (call playback of goshawk and faecal odours of mammalian predators) appeared to support the conclusion that predators had limited role in explaining movements of dispersers. We suggest that predators do not modify context-dependent dispersal among red squirrels in our boreal study area. This finding may be due to the low density of squirrel predators in northern boreal forests but may not hold true for species in which dispersers frequently encounter predators. Our study supports the conclusion that the resource and habitat availability are more important factors than predator presence for context-dependent dispersal among red squirrels.

Significance statement

Context-dependent dispersal means that individuals rely on a set of external cues, such as local population density and habitat quality, to adjust their movement tactics. One potentially important but little studied factor for context-dependent dispersal is the presence of predators. We studied movements of radio-collared dispersing Eurasian red squirrels in relation to nest site locations of their main predator, the goshawk. Movements of dispersing red squirrels were not influenced by the presence of predators. Thus, it seems likely that food and habitat availability, which were previously observed to shape dispersal patterns of red squirrels, determine where and how far Eurasian red squirrels disperse in boreal forests.

Keywords

Movement ecology Dispersal Boreal forest Squirrel 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Mikko Hänninen, Jorma Nurmi, Rauno Varjonen and Tanja Hannola for great help in the field. Constructive comments by two referees were valuable to improve the manuscript.

Funding

The study was financially supported by the Academy of Finland (no. 259562 to VS).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. No ethical approval was required from an institutional or national ethics review board.

References

  1. Bernstein C (1984) Prey and predator emigration responses in the acarine system Tetranychus urticae Phytoseiulus persimilis. Oecologia 61:134–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bestion E, Teyssier A, Aubret F, Clobert J, Cote J (2014) Maternal exposure to predator scents: offspring phenotypic adjustment and dispersal. Proc R Soc B 281:20140701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biro PA (2013) Are most samples of animals systematically biased? Consistent individual trait differences bias samples despite random sampling. Oecologia 171:339–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Biro PA, Dingemanse NJ (2009) Sampling bias resulting from animal personality. Trends Ecol Evol 24:66–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Björklund H, Santangeli AF, Blanchet G, Huitu O, Lehtoranta H, Lindén H, Valkama J, Laaksonen T (2016) Intraguild predation and competition impacts on a subordinate predator. Oecologia 181:257–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonte D, van Dyck H, Bullock JM, Coulon A, Delgado M, Gibbs M, Lehouck V, Matthysen E, Mustin K, Saastamoinen M, Schtickzelle N, Stevens VM, Vandewoestijne S, Baguette M, Barton K, Benton TG, Chaput-Bardy A, Clobert J, Dytham C, Hovestadt T, Meier CM, Palmer SCF, Turlure C, Travis JMJ (2012) Costs of dispersal. Biol Rev 87:290–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boonstra R, Hik D, Singleton GR, Tinnikov A (1998) The impact of predator-induced stress on the snowshoe hare cycle. Ecol Monogr 68:371–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carlson NV, Pargeter HM, Templeton CN (2017) Sparrowhawk movement, calling, and presence of dead conspecifics differentially impact blue tit (Cyanistes caeruleus) vocal and behavioral mobbing responses. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 71:133CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Clobert J, Le Galliard J-F, Cote J, Meylan S, Massot M (2009) Informed dispersal, heterogeneity in animal dispersal syndromes and the dynamics of spatially structured populations. Ecol Lett 12:197–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cooper EB, Taylor RW, Kelley AD, Martinig AR, Boutin S, Humphries MM, Dantzer B, Lane JE, McAdam AG (2017) Personality is correlated with natal dispersal in north American red squirrels. Behaviour 154:939–961CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cote J, Bestion E, Jacob S, Travis J, Legrand D, Baguette M (2017) Evolution of dispersal strategies and dispersal syndromes in fragmented landscapes. Ecography 40:56–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cote J, Clobert J (2007) Social information and emigration: lessons from immigrants. Ecol Lett 10:411–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cote J, Fogarty S, Tymen B, Sih A, Brodin T (2013) Personality dependent dispersal cancelled under predation risk. Proc R Soc B 280:20132349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De Meester N, Bonte D (2010) Information use and density-dependent emigration in an agrobiont spider. Behav Ecol 21:992–998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dell'Arte GL, Laaksonen T, Norrdahl K, Korpimäki E (2007) Variation in the diet composition of a generalist predator, the red fox, in relation to season and density of main prey. Acta Oecol 31:276–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Descamps S, Boutin S, Berteaux D, McAdam AG, Jean-Michel G (2008) Cohort effects in red squirrels: the influence of density, food abundance and temperature on future survival and reproductive success. J Anim Ecol 77:305–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Doligez B, Danchin E, Clobert J (2002) Public information and breeding habitat selection in a wild bird population. Science 297:1168–1170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fey K, Banks PB, Ylönen H, Korpimäki E (2010) Behavioural responses of voles to simulated risk of predation by a native and an alien mustelid: an odour manipulation experiment. Wildlife Res 37:273–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fey K, Hämäläinen S, Selonen V (2016) Roads are no barrier for dispersing red squirrels in an urban environment. Behav Ecol 27:741–747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Forsman JT, Mönkkönen M, Korpimäki E, Thomson RL (2013) Mammalian nest predator feces as a cue in avian habitat selection decisions. Behav Ecol 24:262–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fronhofer EA, Klecka J, Melián CJ, Altermatt F (2015) Condition-dependent movement and dispersal in experimental metacommunities. Ecol Lett 18:954–963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fülling O, Halle S (2004) Breeding suppression in free-ranging grey-sided voles under the influence of predator odour. Oecologia 138:151–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gendron RP, Staddon JER (1984) A laboratory simulation of foraging behavior: the effect of search rate on the probability of detecting prey. Am Nat 124:407–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gurnell J (1983) Squirrel numbers and the abundance of tree seeds. Mammal Rev 13:133–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hakkarainen H, Ilmonen P, Koivunen V, Korpimäki E (2001) Experimental increase of predation risk induces breeding dispersal of Tengmalm’s owl. Oecologia 126:355–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hakkarainen H, Korpimäki E (1994) Nest defence of Tengmalm’s owls reflects offspring survival prospects under fluctuating food conditions. Anim Behav 48:843–849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hakkarainen H, Mykra S, Kurki S, Korpimäki E, Nikula A, Koivunen V (2003) Habitat composition as a determinant of reproductive success of Tengmalm’s owls under fluctuating food conditions. Oikos 100:162–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hammond JI, Luttbeg B, Sih A (2007) Predator and prey space use: dragonflies and tadpoles in an interactive game. Ecology 88:1525–1535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hanski IK, Selonen V (2009) Female-biased natal dispersal in the Siberian flying squirrel. Behav Ecol 20:60–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hämäläinen A, McAdam AG, Dantzer B, Lane JE, Haines JA, Humphries MM, Boutin S (2017) Fitness consequences of peak reproductive effort in a resource pulse system. Sci Rep 7:9335CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Hämäläinen S, Fey K, Selonen V (2018) Habitat and nest use during natal dispersal of the urban red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris). Landscape Urban Plan 169:269–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hiddink JG, Kock RP, Wolff WJ (2002) Active pelagic migrations of the bivalve Macoma balthica are dangerous. Mar Biol 140:1149–1156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ims RA, Hjermann DØ (2001) Condition-dependent dispersal. In: Clobert J, Danchin E, Dhondt AA, Nichols JD (eds) Dispersal. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 203–216Google Scholar
  34. Kauhala K, Talvitie K, Vuorisalo T (2016) Encounters between medium-sized carnivores and humans in the city of Turku, SW Finland, with special reference to the red fox. Mammal Res 61:25–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Korpimäki E, Hakkarainen H (2012) The boreal owl: ecology, behaviour and conservation of a forest-dwelling predator. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Korpimäki E, Sulkava S (1987) Diet and breeding performance of Ural owls Strix uralensis under fluctuating food conditions. Ornis Fenn 64:57–66Google Scholar
  37. Kotler BP, Brown JS, Hasson O (1991) Factors affecting gerbil foraging behavior and rates of owl predation. Ecology 72:2249–2260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kuefler D, Avgar T, Fryxell JM (2012) Rotifer population spread in relation to food, density and predation risk in an experimental system. J Anim Ecol 81:323–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Larsen KW, Boutin S (1994) Movements, survival, and settlement of red squirrel (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus) offspring. Ecology 75:214–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Laundré JW, Hernández L, Altendorf KB (2001) Wolves, elk, and bison: reestablishing the “landscape of fear” in Yellowstone National Park, USA. Can J Zool 79:1401–1409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Le Galliard J-F, Remy A, Ims RA, Lambin X (2012) Patterns and processes of dispersal behaviour in arvicoline rodents. Mol Ecol 21:505–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lima SL (2009) Predators and the breeding bird: behavioral and reproductive flexibility under the risk of predation. Biol Rev 84:485–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lurz PWW, Garson PJ, Wauters LA (1997) Effects of temporal and spatial variation in habitat quality on red squirrel dispersal behaviour. Anim Behav 54:427–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lurz P, Gurnell J, Magris L (2005) Sciurus vulgaris. Mamm Spec 769:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Matthysen E (2005) Density-dependent dispersal in birds and mammals. Ecography 28:403–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McCauley SJ, Rowe L (2010) Notonecta exhibit threat-sensitive, predator-induced dispersal. Biol Lett 6:449–452CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. McIntosh AR, Peckarsky BL, Taylor BW (2002) The influence of predatory fish on mayfly drift: extrapolating from experiments to nature. Freshw Biol 47:1497–1513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Merrick MJ, Koprowski JL (2017) Altered natal dispersal at the range periphery: the role of behavior, resources, and maternal condition. Ecol Evol 7:58–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Morosinotto C, Thomson RL, Korpimäki E (2010) Habitat selection as an antipredator behaviour in a multi-predator landscape: all enemies are not equal. J Anim Ecol 79:327–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Morosinotto C, Villers A, Thomson RL, Varjonen R, Korpimäki E (2017) Competitors and predators alter settlement patterns and reproductive success of an intraguild prey. Ecol Monogr 87:4–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Petty SJ, Lurz PWW, Rushton SP (2003) Predation of red squirrels by northern goshawks in a conifer forest in northern England: can this limit squirrel numbers and create a conservation dilemma? Biol Conserv 111:105–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Poethke HJ, Weisser WW, Hovestadt T (2010) Predator-induced dispersal and the evolution of conditional dispersal in correlated environments. Am Nat 175:577–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ronce O (2007) How does it feel to be like a rolling stone? Ten questions about dispersal evolution. Annu Rev Ecol Evol S 38:231–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Selonen V, Hanski IK (2012) Dispersing Siberian flying squirrels (Pteromys volans) locate preferred habitats in fragmented landscapes. Can J Zool 90:885–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Selonen V, Hanski IK (2015) Occurrence and dispersal of the red squirrel and the Siberian flying squirrel in fragmented landscapes. In: Shuttleworth CM, Lurz P, Hayward MW (eds) Red squirrels: ecology. Conservation & Management in Europe. European Squirrel Initiative, Suffolk, pp 67–82Google Scholar
  56. Selonen V, Hanski IK, Desrochers A (2007) Natal habitat-biased dispersal in the Siberian flying squirrel. Proc R Soc Lond B 274:2063–2068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Selonen V, Sulkava P, Sulkava R, Sulkava S, Korpimäki E (2010) Decline of flying and red squirrels in boreal forests revealed by long-term diet analyses of avian predators. Anim Conserv 13:579–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Selonen V, Varjonen R, Korpimäki E (2015) Immediate or lagged responses of a red squirrel population to pulsed resources. Oecologia 177:401–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Selonen V, Varjonen R, Korpimäki E (2016a) Predator presence, but not food supplementation, affects forest red squirrels in winter. Ann Zool Fenn 53:183–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Selonen V, Wistbacka R (2017) Role of breeding and natal movements in lifetime dispersal of a forest-dwelling rodent. Ecol and Evol 7:2204–2213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Selonen V, Wistbacka R, Korpimäki E (2016b) Food abundance and weather modify reproduction of two arboreal squirrel species. J Mamm 97:1376–1384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Terraube J, Vasko V, Korpimäki E (2015) Mechanisms and reproductive consequences of breeding dispersal in a specialist predator under temporally varying food conditions. Oikos 124:762–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Thomson RL, Tomas G, Forsman JT, Broggi J, Mönkkönen M (2010) Predator proximity as a stressor in breeding flycatchers: mass loss, stress protein induction, and elevated provisioning. Ecology 91:1832–1840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tornberg R, Korpimäki E, Byholm P (2006) Ecology of the northern goshawk in Fennoscandia. Stud Avian Biol-Ser 31:141–157Google Scholar
  65. Turkia T, Korpimäki E, Villers A, Selonen V (2018) Predation risk landscape modifies flying and red squirrel nest site occupancy independently of habitat amount. PLoS One 13:e0194624CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  66. Verhulst S, Perrins CM, Riddington R (1997) Natal dispersal of great tits in a patchy environment. Ecology 78:864–872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wauters L, Dhondt AA (1993) Immigration pattern and success in red squirrels. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 33:159–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wauters LA, Githiru M, Bertolino S, Molinari A, Tosi G, Lens L (2008) Demography of alpine red squirrel populations in relation to fluctuations in seed crop size. Ecography 31:104–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wauters LA, Verbeylen G, Preatoni D, Martinoli A, Matthysen E (2010) Dispersal and habitat cuing of Eurasian red squirrels in fragmented habitats. Popul Ecol 52:527–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Section of Ecology, Department of BiologyUniversity of TurkuTurkuFinland

Personalised recommendations