Influence of predation risk on individual spatial positioning and willingness to leave a safe refuge in a social benthic fish
Certain individuals tend to occupy frontal positions within social groups. Less is known about how predation risk can affect individual spatial positioning and group fidelity. We tracked individuals within groups goldfish (Carassius auratus) as they left a safe, covered, microhabitat to enter a risky, open-water, microhabitat over 2 days: one with and one without an avian predator (little egret—Egretta garzetta) present. For each day, an outing index was calculated to take into account both individual order of emergence from the refuge and the proportion of outings participated in. Prior to the experiment, fish were individually marked for identification, measured, and tested for boldness to enter a novel area. Body size did not predict individual outing index scores on either control or experimental days. Boldness index scores influenced outing index scores only on days with an egret present. We found individual outing index scores to be relatively consistent across both days, regardless of the presence of a predator. However, the presence of a predator increased the mean outing index score of the highest ranked fish and decreased the number of fish that occupied lead positions, suggesting that risk amplified the behaviour of the boldest fish. Furthermore, the presence of the predator decreased individual willingness to leave the safety of cover. Thus, we show that the introduction of a predator influenced social group movement and that the boldest individuals emerge at the front of the group under risk.
Within social species, some bold individuals tend to occupy positions at the front of the group. Groups of goldfish were provided a safe covered refuge, and we recorded the order in which individuals left the refuge to enter an open water environment over multiple outings. We examined fish behaviour over 2 days: with and without a predator present. We found that the predator decreased the probability the fish would leave the safe refuge; however, relative individual fish behaviour and positioning were consistent over the 2 days. Interestingly, the presence of the predator amplified the behaviour of the boldest fish. Our results demonstrate that predation risk can influence group and individual prey behaviour and illustrate that bold individuals emerge at the front of groups when risk is high.
KeywordsGoldfish Social group Cohesion Predator-prey Consistency Refuge
This study was supported by Israel Science Foundation Grant 05/14. SV is grateful to the Azrieli Foundation for the award of an Azrieli Post-doctoral Fellowship at Ben-Gurion University. The authors thank two anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions.
Compliance with ethical standards
All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. The experiments were conducted in full accordance with the animal care and ethical guidelines of Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, and the Abramsky lab was granted permission to use egrets and goldfish in this study by the committee for the ethical care and use of animals in experiments (Authorization number: IL-37-07-2017).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Brown JS (1999) Vigilance, patch use and habitat selection: foraging under predation risk. Evol Ecol Res 1:49–71Google Scholar
- Hafner H, Boy V, Gory G (1982) Feeding methods, flock size and feeding success in the little egret Egretta garzetta and the Squacco heron Ardeola ralloides in Camargue, southern France. Ardea 70:45–54Google Scholar
- Holopainen IJ, Tonn WM, Paszkowski CA (1997) Tales of two fish: the dichotomous biology of crucian carp (Carassius carassius (L.)) in northern Europe. Ann Zool Fenn 34:1–22Google Scholar
- Katz MW, Abramsky Z, Kotler BP, Alteshtein O, Rosenzweig ML (2010) Playing the waiting game: predator and prey in a test environment. Evol Ecol Res 12:793–801Google Scholar
- Katz MW, Abramsky Z, Kotler BP, Roth I, Alteshtein O, Rosenzweig ML (2014) A predator–prey behavioural game: how does number of food patches influence foraging tactics? Evol Ecol Res 16:19–35Google Scholar
- Killen SS, Marras S, Steffensen JF, McKenzie DJ (2012a) Aerobic capacity influences the spatial position of individuals within fish schools. Proc R Soc Lond B 279:357–364Google Scholar
- Killen SS, Marras S, Ryan MR, Domenici P, McKenzie DJ (2012b) A relationship between metabolic rate and risk‐taking behaviour is revealed during hypoxia in juvenile European sea bass. Funct Ecol 26:134–143Google Scholar
- Magurran AE (1984) Gregarious goldfish. New Sci 103:32–33Google Scholar
- Pavlov DS, Kasumyan AO (2000) Patterns and mechanisms of schooling behaviour in fish: a review. J Ichthyol 40:S163–S231Google Scholar
- R Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, http://www.R-project.org
- Schaerf T, Herbert-Read JE, Myerscough MR, Sumpter DJ, Ward AJ (2016) Identifying differences in the rules of interaction between individuals in moving animal groups. arXiv:1601.08202Google Scholar
- Sogard SM (1997) Size-selective mortality in the juvenile stage of teleost fishes: a review. Bull Mar Sci 60:1129–1157Google Scholar