Release from ecological constraint erases sex difference in social ornamentation
Sex differences in animal ornamentation are thought largely genetically fixed due to stronger sexual selection on males of species with conventional sex roles. But, other types of sex differences are not genetically fixed. For example, several differences in human social behavior result instead from sociocultural or economic constraints on women. Since gregarious animals use ornamentation for various social functions, perhaps some of their sex differences are, similarly to human behavior, due to social coercion or ecological constraint (their closest equivalents to human social and economic constraints, respectively). We found sex differences in ornamentation that disappear plastically in a social species with conventional sex roles. The red bill of common waxbills (Estrilda astrild) is on average more saturated in males, but in our experiment female bill color correlated with night temperature, an important energetic stressor, suggesting that sexual dichromatism disappears when ecological conditions are favorable to females. Female ornamentation may be more adversely affected by ecology because of their life history that requires balancing investment in ornamentation with maintaining reproductive condition. Manipulation of stress-related physiology (ACTH challenge) suggests that this effect was not mediated by stress mechanisms. Social coercion appears to not explain sexual dichromatism: males were not more aggressive than females, aggressiveness was not related to bill color, and manipulation of reproductive axis’ physiology (GnRH challenge, which in many species mediates aggressiveness) did not increase bill color. Our results show parallels to the plastic sex differences of humans in social animals and suggest that studying their ecological vs. social causes provides a biological backdrop for understanding the human case as well.
Many sex differences in human social behavior result from economic or sociocultural constraints on women, while sex differences in the ornamentation of animals with conventional sex roles are thought largely genetically fixed. We show that a sex difference in ornamentation—the redder bills of male than female common waxbills—disappears plastically in an animal with conventional sex roles due to, in part, changes in female ornamentation. Social coercion did not explain reduced female ornamentation: aggressiveness did not predict bill color, and males were not dominant over females. Instead, female bill color was reduced during colder weather, perhaps because females under energetic stress need to balance investment in social ornamentation vs. maintaining reproductive condition. Similarly to humans, some sex differences of gregarious animals may be due to females requiring appropriate conditions to express their full social potential.
KeywordsPlastic sex differences Ecological constraint Social coercion Color ornamentation
We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for valuable comments that much improved this article.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Bakken GS, Murphy MT, Erskine DJ (1991) The effect of wind and air temperature on metabolism and evaporative water loss rates of dark-eyed juncos, Junco hyemalis: a standard operative temperature scale. Physiol Biochem Zool 64:1023–1049Google Scholar
- Clement P, Harris A, Davies J (1993) Finches and sparrows. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Montgomerie R (2006) Analyzing colors. In: Hill GE, McGraw KJ (eds) Bird coloration, vol. 1: mechanisms and measurements. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 90–147Google Scholar
- Observatório Astronómico de Lisboa (2014) Nascimento e Ocaso do Sol (Porto), http://oal.ul.pt
- Romero LM, Soma KK, Wingfield JC (1998) Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis changes allow seasonal modulation of corticosterone in a bird. Am J Phys 274:R1338–R1344Google Scholar
- Schull Q, Dobson FS, Stier A, Robin JP, Bize P, Viblanc VA (2016) Beak color dynamically signals changes in fasting status and parasite loads in king penguins. Behav Ecol 27:1684–1693Google Scholar
- West-Eberhard MJ (1979) Sexual selection, social competition, and evolution. PAm Philos Soc 123:222–234Google Scholar
- West-Eberhard MJ (2003) Developmental plasticity and evolution. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Wharton AS (2012) The sociology of gender: an introduction to theory and research, 2nd edn. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
- Wingfield JC, O’Reilly KM, Astheimer LB (1995) Modulation of the adrenocortical responses to acute stress in arctic birds: a possible ecological basis. Integr Comp Biol 35:285–294Google Scholar