Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

The effect of open-wedge and closed-wedge high tibial osteotomies on the tibial posterior slope—a study of two hundred seventy-nine cases

  • 30 Accesses

Abstract

Purpose

There are two established techniques for high tibial valgisation osteotomy (HTO): medial open wedge (MOW) and lateral closed wedge (LCW). The aim was to analyze the change of the posterior tibial slope (PTS) caused by HTOs dependent on the technique.

Methods

Four hundred fourteen cases of HTOs were analyzed retrospectively. Two hundred seventy-nine osteotomies in 247 patients matched the inclusion criteria and were divided into two treatment groups (MOW/LCW). The PTS was determined on pre- and post-surgical lateral knee X-rays by measuring the proximal posterior tibial angle (PPTA).

Results

One hundred ninety of the included 279 cases were assigned to the MOW and 89 to the LCW group. The mean PPTA in MOW HTOs was 79.9° ± 32° (68–88°) and in LCW HTOs 80.6° ± 2.6° (74–88°). There was no statistically significant change of the PPTA in the MOW group comparing the pre- and post-surgical values (delta PPTA 0.07° ±2.9° (− 12 to 11°)). In the LCW group, the surgery resulted in a statistically significant reduction (p< 0.001) of the PTS (delta PPTA − 3.09° ± 4.5° (− 12 to 5°)).

Conclusion

The important finding of this study is that the thesis of a slope increase in MOW osteotomies found in the literature could not be approved regarding our results as no statistically significant change of PTS in MOW HTOs was observed. The findings support the common thesis that LCW osteotomies cause a slope reduction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. 1.

    Agneskirchner JD, Hurschler C, Stukenborg-Colsman C, Imhoff AB, Lobenhoffer P (2004) Effect of high tibial flexion ostoeotomy on cartilage pressure and joint kinematics: a biomechanical study in human cadaveric knees. Winner of the AGA-Donjoy Award 2004. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124(9):575–584

  2. 2.

    Black MS, d’Entremont AG, McCormack RG, Hansen G, Carr D, Wilson DR (2018) The effect of wedge an tibial slope angles on knee contact pressure and kinematics following medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Clin Biomech 51:17–25

  3. 3.

    Brazier J, Migaud H, Gougeon F, Cotten A, Fontaine C, Duquennoy A (1996) Evaluation of methods for radiographic measurement of the tibial slope. A study of 83 healthy knees. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 82(3):195–200

  4. 4.

    Brouwer RW, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, van Koeveringe AJ, Verhaar JA (2005) Patellar height and the inclination of the tibial plateau after high tibial osteotomy. The open versus the closed-wedge technique. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 87(9):1227–1232

  5. 5.

    Ducat A, Sariali E, Lebel B, Mertl P, Hernigou P, Flecher X, Zayni R, Bonnin M, Jalil R, Amzallag J, Rosset P, Servien E, Gaudot F, Judet T, Catonné Y (2012) Posterior tibial slope changes after opening- and closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy: a comparative prospective multicenter study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 98(1):68–74

  6. 6.

    El-Azab H, Halawa A, Anetzberger H, Imhoff AB, Hinterwimmer S (2008) The effect of closed- and open-wedge high tibial osteotomy on tibial slope. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 90-B:1193–1197

  7. 7.

    Ferner F, Lutter C, Dickschas J, Strecker W (2018) Medial open wedge vs. lateral closed wedge high tibial osteotomy-indications based on the findings of patellar height, leg length, torsional correction and clinical outcome in one hundred cases. Int Orthop. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4155-9

  8. 8.

    Galla M, Lobenhoffer P (2004) Die öffnende valgisierende umstellungsosteotomie der proximalen tibia mit dem tomofix-plattenfixateur. Oper Orthop Traumatol 16:397–417

  9. 9.

    Giffin JR, Vogrin TM, Zantop T, Woo SL, Harner CD (2004) Effects of increasing the tibial slope on the biomechanics of the knee. Am J Sports Med 32:378–382

  10. 10.

    Hohmann E, Bryant A, Imhoff AB (2005) The effect of closed wedge high tibial osteotomy on tibial slope: a radiographic study. Knee Surg Sport Traumtol Arthrosc 14:454–459

  11. 11.

    Kaper Bp, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, MacDonald SJ (2001) Patellar infera after high tibial osteotomy. J Arthroplast 16:168–173

  12. 12.

    LaPrade RF, Oro FP, Ziegler CG, Wijdicks CA, Walsh MP (2010) Patellar height and tibial slope after opening-wedge proximal tibial osteotomy: a prospective study. Am J Sports Med 38:160–170

  13. 13.

    Matsuda S, Miura H, Nagamine R, Urabe K, Ikenoue T, Okazaki K, Iwamoto Y (1999) Posterior tibial slope in the normal and varus knee. Am J Knee Surg 12(3):165–168

  14. 14.

    Nha K-W, Kim H-J, Ahn H-S, Lee D-H (2016) Change in posterior tibial slope after open-wedge and closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy-a meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 44(11):3006–3013

  15. 15.

    Ogawa H, Matsumoto K, Ogawa T, Takeuchi K, Akiyama H (2016) Effect of wedge insertion angle on posterior tibial slope in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. Orthop J Sports Med 4(2):2325967116630748. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967116630748

  16. 16.

    Paley D, Herzenberg JE, Tetsworth K, McKie J, Bhave A (1994) Deformity planning for frontal and sagittal plane corrective osteotomies. Orthop Clin North Am 25:425–465

  17. 17.

    Portner O (2014) High tibial valgus osteotomy: closing, opening or combined? Patellar height as a determining factor. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472:3432–3440

  18. 18.

    Smith TO, Sexton D, Mitchel P, Hing CB (2011) Opening- or closing-wedged high tibial osteotomy: a meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes. Knee 18:361–368

  19. 19.

    Strecker W, Muller M, Urschel C (2014) High tibial closed wedge valgus osteotomy. Oper Orthop Traumatol 26:196–205

  20. 20.

    Turgut A, Kayali C, Agus H (2012) Radiological analysis of closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi 23(2):82–87

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Ilona Schubert.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schubert, I., Ferner, F. & Dickschas, J. The effect of open-wedge and closed-wedge high tibial osteotomies on the tibial posterior slope—a study of two hundred seventy-nine cases. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04499-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Posterior tibial slope
  • Medial open wedge osteotomy (MOW)
  • Lateral closed wedge osteotomy (LCW)