Treatment of cephalotuberosity fractures in elderly patients treated by reverse shoulder prosthesis: a study of functional results in relation to deltoid tension
- 34 Downloads
The treatment of proximal humerus fractures is a therapeutic challenge in the elderly as the functional demands of these patients are high. We postulated that there may be a relationship between functional results and deltoid tension when these fractures are treated with a reverse prosthesis. This study was performed to determine the optimal tension of the deltoid. The primary outcome was the constant score in relation to humeral length at the final follow-up.
Materials and methods
Our retrospective cohort consisted of 45 patients treated with a reverse fracture prosthesis during the period from January 2010 to July 2017. The fractures were all classified as Neer III or IV, 91% of our patients were women and the average age was 82 years.
Constant score and antepulsion were improved with humeral elongation between 10 and 25 mm (p < 0.02 and p < 0.05, respectively). External rotation was improved with humeral elongation (p < 0.03).
Tuberosity reinsertion improves mobility in patients treated surgically for a reverse fracture prosthesis. The recovery of anatomical retroversion seems of fundamental importance, and we confirmed that deltoid tension that must also be taken into account to improve functional results of reverse shoulder prosthesis on fracture. The ideal humeral elongation seems to be between 10 and 25 mm, in relation to the contralateral side, to obtain better functional results.
KeywordsDeltoid tension Reverse shoulder prosthesis Proximal humerus fracture Geriatric trauma Functional results Radiological results
Compliance with Ethical standards
A study accepted by the ethics committee of our institution.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
- 3.Obert L, Saadnia R, Tournier C, Bonnevialle N, Saragaglia D, Sirveaux F, La S (2016) Four-part fractures treated with a reversed total shoulder prosthesis: prospective and retrospective multicenter study. Results and complications. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 102(3):279–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2016.01.019 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Jobin CM, Brown GD, Bahu MJ, Gardner TR, Bigliani LU, Levine WN, Ahmad CS (2012) Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for cuff tear arthropathy: the clinical effect of deltoid lengthening and center of rotation medialization. J Shoulder Elb Surg 21(10):1269–1277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2011.08.049 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Lowe JT, Lawler SM, Testa EJ, Jawa A (2018) Lateralization of the glenosphere in reverse shoulder arthroplasty decreases arm lengthening and demonstrates comparable risk of nerve injury compared with anatomic arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study. J Shoulder Elb Surg 27(10):1845–1851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2018.06.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Lenarz C, Shishani Y, McCrum C, Nowinski RJ, Edwards TB, Gobezie R (2011) Is reverse shoulder arthroplasty appropriate for the treatment of fractures in the older patient? Early observations. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(12):3324–3331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-2055-z CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 17.Bufquin T, Hersan A, Hubert L, Massin P (2007) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly: a prospective review of 43 cases with a short-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 89(4):516–520. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.89B4.18435 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Pape G, Tonne L, Raiss P, Loew M, Zeifang F (2013) Prostheses for fractures of the proximal humerus: presentation of current results of anatomical fracture shoulder prosthesis under consideration of alternative concepts. Orthopade 42(3):164–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-012-2059-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Mattiassich G, Marcovici LL, Krifter RM, Ortmaier R, Wegerer P, Kroepfl A (2013) Delta III reverse shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of complex 3- and 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus: 6 to 42 months of follow up. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 14:231. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-14-231 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar