Letter to the editor regarding “Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy versus microendoscopic discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a meta-analysis”
Letter to the Editor
- 17 Downloads
Compliance with ethical standards
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- 2.Higgins JPT, Green S (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 [EB/OL]. The Cochrane Collaboration. Http: // www. cochrane-handbook.orgGoogle Scholar
- 4.Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D (2011) The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, OttawaGoogle Scholar
- 5.Mu X, Wei J, A J, Li Z, Ou Y (2018) The short-term efficacy and safety of artificial total disc replacement for selected patients with lumbar degenerative disc disease compared with anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 13(12):e0209660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
© SICOT aisbl 2019