Clinical and radiological outcomes in thoracolumbar fractures using the SpineJack device. A prospective study of seventy-four patients with a two point three year mean of follow-up
- 1 Downloads
The aim of this study was to assess clinical and radiological results of SpineJack on the treatment of vertebral body fractures in a continuous prospective series of patients.
Material and methods
Between May 2012 and April 2015, all patients operated using the SpineJack device were prospectively included in this monocentric study. Demographic data, clinical, and radiological results were recorded. Complications and surgical managements were recorded.
At a mean follow-up of 2.3 years, 74 patients with 77 fractured vertebrae were included. The stand-alone SpineJack group comprised 60 patients with 63 fractured vertebrae (group 1) and the group with additional posterior fixation 14 patients with 14 fractured vertebrae (group 2). The average initial vertebral wedge angle was 13.3 ± 6.1 degrees for group 1 and 15.3 ± 5.7 degrees for group 2 (p = 0.25). Post-operative values were 6.5 ± 4.6 degrees for group 1 and 5.1 ± 3.9 degrees for group 2 (p = 0.31). The differences within the same group were highly significant (p < 0.0005). The loss of reduction at last follow-up was 0.8 ± 1.6 degrees in group 1 and 0.6 ± 2.0 degrees in group 2 (p = 0.77). Subjective results were considered as very good or good for 57 patients (95%) in group 1 and for 11 patients (79%) in group 2, p = 0.07.
The SpineJack seems to be a promising tool in the treatment of traumatic vertebral fractures with a correction in the sagittal plane comparable with what can be found in the literature.
KeywordsSpineJack Vertebral augmentation Vertebral compression fracture Percutaneous surgery Sagittal correction
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- 2.Mayer M, Ortmaier R, Koller H, Koller J, Hitzl W, Auffarth A, Resch H, von Keudell A (2017) Impact of sagittal balance on clinical outcomes in surgically treated T12 and L1 burst fractures: analysis of long-term outcomes after posterior-only and combined posteroanterior treatment. Biomed Res Int 2017:1568258. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1568258 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Van Meirhaeghe J, Bastian L, Boonen S, Ranstam J, Tillman JB, Wardlaw D, investigators FREE (2013) A randomized trial of balloon kyphoplasty and nonsurgical management for treating acute vertebral compression fractures: vertebral body kyphosis correction and surgical parameters. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:971–983. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828e8e22 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Zairi F, Court C, Tropiano P, Charles YP, Tonetti J, Fuentes S, Litrico S, Deramond H, Beaurain J, Orcel P, Delecrin J, Aebi M, Assaker R, French Society of Spine Surgery (2012) Minimally invasive management of thoraco-lumbar fractures: combined percutaneous fixation and balloon kyphoplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 98:S105–S111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2012.06.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Garnier L, Tonetti J, Bodin A, Vouaillat H, Merloz P, Assaker R, Court C, French Society for Spine Surgery (2012) Kyphoplasty versus vertebroplasty in osteoporotic thoracolumbar spine fractures. Short-term retrospective review of a multicentre cohort of 127 consecutive patients. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 98:S112–S119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2012.03.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Krüger A, Oberkircher L, Figiel J, Floßdorf F, Bolzinger F, Noriega DC, Ruchholtz S (2015) Height restoration of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures using different intravertebral reduction devices: a cadaveric study. Spine J 15:1092–1098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.094 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Rotter R, Schmitt L, Gierer P, Schmitz KP, Noriega D, Mittlmeier T, Meeder PJ, Martin H (2015) Minimum cement volume required in vertebral body augmentation--a biomechanical study comparing the permanent SpineJack device and balloon kyphoplasty in traumatic fracture. Clin Biomech 30:720–725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2015.04.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Noriega D, Krüger A, Ardura F, Hansen-Algenstaedt N, Hassel F, Barreau X, Beyerlein J (2015) Clinical outcome after the use of a new craniocaudal expandable implant for vertebral compression fracture treatment: one year results from a prospective multicentric study. Biomed Res Int 2015:927813. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/927813 Google Scholar
- 19.Noriega DC, Rodrίguez-Monsalve F, Ramajo R, Sánchez-Lite I, Toribio B, Ardura F (2019) Long-term safety and clinical performance of kyphoplasty and SpineJack® procedures in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a pilot, monocentric, investigator-initiated study. Osteoporos Int 30:637–645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-018-4773-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Muñoz Montoya JE, Torres C, Ferrer ER, Muñoz Rodríguez EE (2018) A Colombian experience involving SpineJack®, a consecutive series of patients experiencing spinal fractures, percutaneous approach and anatomical restoration 2016-2017. J Spine Surg 4:624–629. https://doi.org/10.21037/jss.2018.07.08 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Premat K, Vande Perre S, Cormier É, Shotar E, Degos V, Morardet L, Fargeot C, Clarençon F, Chiras J (2018) Vertebral augmentation with the SpineJack® in chronic vertebral compression fractures with major kyphosis. Eur Radiol 28:4985–4991. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5544-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Yue JJ, Sossan A, Selgrath C, Deutsch LS, Wilkens K, Testaiuti M, Gabriel JP (2002) The treatment of unstable thoracic spine fractures with transpedicular screw instrumentation: a 3-year consecutive series. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27:2782–2787Google Scholar
- 23.Khare S, Sharma V (2013) Surgical outcome of posterior short segment trans-pedicle screw fixation for thoracolumbar fractures. J Orthop 10:162–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2013.09.010