Anatomy of clavicle in the Indian population and its applicability in pre-contoured plating

  • Mohamed Faheem KotekarEmail author
  • Shailesh Pai
  • K. Yogesh
  • M. Ajith Kumar
  • M. Shantharam Shetty
Original Paper



Fractures of the clavicle are traditionally treated non-operatively, but with the increase of high-energy trauma, there has been an increase in the operative management of these fractures. Controversy exists on the type of fixation for middle third clavicle fractures. The anatomically pre-contoured plates are low-profile mechanically sound plates which do not cause much soft tissue irritation.


To characterise the clavicular morphology through computerised tomography and determine the applicability of pre-contoured plates for our population.


In this study, the mean total length was 145.31 mm and the apex of superior clavicle bow was located 38.15 mm from the acromial end, thereby giving a zone of 107.16 mm for plating. In the 107.16 mm of platable zone, the zone of ideal fracture location was 43.16 mm. Superior anterior plates had a good fit in 89.3% of the CT subset, whereas superior plates had a good fit in only 71.6% of the population.


Superior anterior pre-contoured clavicle plates have approximately 98% good to fair compatibility for clavicles in the South Indian population without any need for further intra-operative moulding.


Clavicle Pre-contoured plating Fractures of the clavicle 


Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    NEER CS II (1968) 5 fractures of the distal third of the clavicle. Clin Orthop Relat Res (1976–2007) 1(58):43–50Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nordqvist A, Petersson C (1994) The incidence of fractures of the clavicle. Clin Orthop Relat Res 300:127–132Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Postacchini F, Gumina S, De Santis P, Albo F Epidemiology of clavicle fractures. J Shoulder Elb Surg 11(5):452–6Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Robinson CM (1998) Fractures of the clavicle in the adult. Epidemiology and classification. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 80(3):476–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen W, Zhu Y, Liu S, Hou Z, Zhang X, Lv H et al (2018) Demographic and socioeconomic factors influencing the incidence of clavicle fractures, a national population-based survey of five hundred and twelve thousand, one hundred and eighty seven individuals. Int Orthop 42(3):651–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Allman FL (1967) Fractures and ligamentous injuries of the clavicle and its articulation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 49(4):774–784CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    O’Neill BJ, Hirpara KM, O’Briain D, McGarr C, Kaar TK (2011) Clavicle fractures: a comparison of five classification systems and their relationship to treatment outcomes. Int Orthop 35(6):909–914CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rowe CR (1968) An atlas of anatomy and treatment of midclavicular fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res (1976–2007) 1(58):29–42Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zlowodzki M, Zelle BA, Cole PA, Jeray K, McKee MD (2005) Evidence-based Orthopaedic trauma working group. Treatment of acute midshaft clavicle fractures: systematic review of 2144 fractures: on behalf of the Evidence-Based Orthopaedic Trauma Working Group. J Orthop Trauma 19(7):504–507CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society (2007) Nonoperative treatment compared with plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg 89(1):1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    McKee MD, Pedersen EM, Jones C, Stephen DJG, Kreder HJ, Schemitsch EH et al (2006) Deficits following nonoperative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg 88(1):35PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Andermahr J, Jubel A, Elsner A, Johann J, Prokop A, Rehm KE et al (2007) Anatomy of the clavicle and the intramedullary nailing of midclavicular fractures. Clin Anat 20(1):48–56CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Golish SR, Oliviero JA, Francke EI, Miller MD (2008) A biomechanical study of plate versus intramedullary devices for midshaft clavicle fixation. J Orthop Surg Res 3(1):28CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Iannotti MR, Crosby LA, Stafford P, Grayson G, Goulet R (2002) Effects of plate location and selection on the stability of midshaft clavicle osteotomies: a biomechanical study. J Shoulder Elb Surg 11(5):457–62Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Huang JI, Toogood P, Chen MR, Wilber JH, Cooperman DR (2007) Clavicular anatomy and the applicability of precontoured plates. J Bone Joint Surg 89(10):2260PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chechik O, Batash R, Goldstein Y, Snir N, Amar E, Drexler M et al (2018) Surgical approach for open reduction and internal fixation of clavicle fractures: a comparison of vertical and horizontal incisions. Int Orthop 5:1–6Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Smekal V, Deml C, Irenberger A, Niederwanger C, Lutz M, Blauth M et al (2008) Length determination in midshaft clavicle fractures: validation of measurement. J Orthop Trauma 22(7):458–462CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Daruwalla ZJ, Courtis P, Fitzpatrick C, Fitzpatrick D, Mullett H (2010) Anatomic variation of the clavicle: a novel three-dimensional study. Clin Anat 23(2):199–209PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Walters J, Solomons M, Roche S (2010) A morphometric study of the clavicle. SA Orthop J 9(3):47–52Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bernat A, Huysmans T, Van Glabbeek F, Sijbers J, Gielen J, Van Tongel A (2014) The anatomy of the clavicle: a three-dimensional cadaveric study. Clin Anat 27(5):712–723CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bachoura A, Deane AS, Kamineni S (2012) Clavicle anatomy and the applicability of intramedullary midshaft fracture fixation. J Shoulder Elb Surg 21(10):1384–1390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kim H, Nam K, Kang D, Oh S, Kho D (2013) Anatomical analysis of clavicles in Korean adults and compatibility of pre-contoured anatomical plates. J Korean Orthop Assoc 48(5):350–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    King PR, Scheepers S, Ikram A (2014) Anatomy of the clavicle and its medullary canal: a computed tomography study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 24(1):37–42CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Haque MK, Mansur DI, Krishnamurthy A, Karki R, Sharma K, Shakya R (2011) Analysis of clavicle in Nepalese population. Kathmandu Univ Med J 9(3):193–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chavda HS, Khatri CR, Varlekar PD, Saiyad SS (2013) Morphometric analysis and sex determination from clavicles in Gujarati population. Natl J Integr Res Med 4:6Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nagarchi K, Pillai JT, Saheb SH, Brekeit K, Alharbi M (2014) Morphometry of clavicle. J Pharm Sci Res 6(2):112Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Paladini P, Pellegrini A, Merolla G, Campi F, Porcellini G (2012) Treatment of clavicle fractures. Transl Med UniSa 2:47–58PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Parsons FG (1916) On the proportions and characteristics of the modern English clavicle. J Anat 51(Pt 1):71–93PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nourian A, Dhaliwal S, Vangala S, Vezeridis PS (2017) Midshaft fractures of the clavicle. J Orthop Trauma 31(9):461–467CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zhang T, Chen W, Sun J, Zhang Q, Zhang Y (2017) Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis technique for displaced midshaft clavicular fracture using the clavicle reductor. Int Orthop 41(8):1679–1683CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SICOT aisbl 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryTejasvini Hospital & SSIOTMangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations