Anatomy of clavicle in the Indian population and its applicability in pre-contoured plating
- 51 Downloads
Fractures of the clavicle are traditionally treated non-operatively, but with the increase of high-energy trauma, there has been an increase in the operative management of these fractures. Controversy exists on the type of fixation for middle third clavicle fractures. The anatomically pre-contoured plates are low-profile mechanically sound plates which do not cause much soft tissue irritation.
To characterise the clavicular morphology through computerised tomography and determine the applicability of pre-contoured plates for our population.
In this study, the mean total length was 145.31 mm and the apex of superior clavicle bow was located 38.15 mm from the acromial end, thereby giving a zone of 107.16 mm for plating. In the 107.16 mm of platable zone, the zone of ideal fracture location was 43.16 mm. Superior anterior plates had a good fit in 89.3% of the CT subset, whereas superior plates had a good fit in only 71.6% of the population.
Superior anterior pre-contoured clavicle plates have approximately 98% good to fair compatibility for clavicles in the South Indian population without any need for further intra-operative moulding.
KeywordsClavicle Pre-contoured plating Fractures of the clavicle
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.NEER CS II (1968) 5 fractures of the distal third of the clavicle. Clin Orthop Relat Res (1976–2007) 1(58):43–50Google Scholar
- 2.Nordqvist A, Petersson C (1994) The incidence of fractures of the clavicle. Clin Orthop Relat Res 300:127–132Google Scholar
- 3.Postacchini F, Gumina S, De Santis P, Albo F Epidemiology of clavicle fractures. J Shoulder Elb Surg 11(5):452–6Google Scholar
- 5.Chen W, Zhu Y, Liu S, Hou Z, Zhang X, Lv H et al (2018) Demographic and socioeconomic factors influencing the incidence of clavicle fractures, a national population-based survey of five hundred and twelve thousand, one hundred and eighty seven individuals. Int Orthop 42(3):651–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Rowe CR (1968) An atlas of anatomy and treatment of midclavicular fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res (1976–2007) 1(58):29–42Google Scholar
- 9.Zlowodzki M, Zelle BA, Cole PA, Jeray K, McKee MD (2005) Evidence-based Orthopaedic trauma working group. Treatment of acute midshaft clavicle fractures: systematic review of 2144 fractures: on behalf of the Evidence-Based Orthopaedic Trauma Working Group. J Orthop Trauma 19(7):504–507CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Iannotti MR, Crosby LA, Stafford P, Grayson G, Goulet R (2002) Effects of plate location and selection on the stability of midshaft clavicle osteotomies: a biomechanical study. J Shoulder Elb Surg 11(5):457–62Google Scholar
- 16.Chechik O, Batash R, Goldstein Y, Snir N, Amar E, Drexler M et al (2018) Surgical approach for open reduction and internal fixation of clavicle fractures: a comparison of vertical and horizontal incisions. Int Orthop 5:1–6Google Scholar
- 19.Walters J, Solomons M, Roche S (2010) A morphometric study of the clavicle. SA Orthop J 9(3):47–52Google Scholar
- 25.Chavda HS, Khatri CR, Varlekar PD, Saiyad SS (2013) Morphometric analysis and sex determination from clavicles in Gujarati population. Natl J Integr Res Med 4:6Google Scholar
- 26.Nagarchi K, Pillai JT, Saheb SH, Brekeit K, Alharbi M (2014) Morphometry of clavicle. J Pharm Sci Res 6(2):112Google Scholar