Advertisement

International Orthopaedics

, Volume 43, Issue 10, pp 2217–2226 | Cite as

A decade of Australian and New Zealand orthopaedic publications: a bibliometric trend analysis from 2008 to 2018

  • Agesilaus W. Churchill
  • Eva Malacova
  • Simon F. Journeaux
  • Martin Richardson
  • Ross Crawford
  • Mark L. VickersEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Purpose

We aimed to apply bibliometric tools to Australian and New Zealand orthopaedic publications produced between 2008 and 2018 to identify the most highly cited publications, author and institution collaboration networks and topic trends. Analysis of the literature can highlight areas of emerging interest and knowledge gaps, and direct future research.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted using Clarivate Analytics Web of Science. Citation analysis was carried out using Web of Science. Collaboration networks were constructed using chord diagrams. Trends in publication topics were analysed using simple linear regression to find the rate of change of publication volume on each topic.

Results

A total of 3097 publications contributed to by 8855 individual authors met inclusion criteria. Across the study period, there was a large increase in the annual volume of publications on the topic of ACL (Anterior Cruciate Ligament) surgery. We also found that collaboration between Australian and New Zealand authors was very low with only 1% (n = 31) of publications including authors from both countries and 0.4% (n = 12) including orthopaedic surgeons or trainees from both.

Conclusions

Publications on ACL surgery have increased over the past decade, likely due to the presence of competing surgical approaches and the recently recognized risk of osteoarthritis following ACL reconstruction. The overall collaboration between Australian and New Zealand authors was very low which lends itself to opportunities for future research.

Keywords

Orthopaedics Bibliometrics Australia New Zealand Anterior cruciate ligament 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

264_2019_4359_MOESM1_ESM.docx (13 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 12.6 kb)
264_2019_4359_MOESM2_ESM.docx (22 kb)
ESM 2 (DOCX 21.6 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    New Zealand Orthopaedic Association (2014) A brief history of orthopaedics in New Zealand. New Zealand Orthopaedic Association. http://www.nzoa.org.nz/brief-history-orthopaedics-new-zealand. Accessed 11 November 2018
  2. 2.
    Williams PF (1992) Orthopaedic surgery in Australia: an international perspective. Aust N Z J Surg 62(1):3–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Karunaratne S, Duan M, Pappas E, Fritsch B, Boyle R, Gupta S, Stalley P, Horsley M, Steffens D (2018) The effectiveness of robotic hip and knee arthroplasty on patient-reported outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Orthop.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4140-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rutherford M, Khan RJK, Fick DP, Haebich S, Nivbrant O, Kozak T (2019) Randomised clinical trial assessing migration of uncemented primary total hip replacement stems, with and without autologous impaction bone grafting. Int Orthop.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-019-04290-5
  5. 5.
    de Steiger RN, Hang JR, Miller LN, Graves SE, Davidson DC (2011) Five-year results of the ASR XL acetabular system and the ASR hip resurfacing system: an analysis from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(24):2287–2293.  https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.J.01727 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vijaysegaran P, Knibbs LD, Morawska L, Crawford RW (2018) Surgical space suits increase particle and microbiological emission rates in a simulated surgical environment. J Arthroplast 33(5):1524–1529.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.12.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gallagher CA, Jones CW, Kimmel L, Wylde C, Osbrough A, Bulsara M, Hird K, Yates P (2019) Osteoarthritis is associated with increased failure of proximal femoral fracture fixation. Int Orthop 43(5):1223–1230.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4014-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wallin JA (2005) Bibliometric methods: pitfalls and possibilities. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 97(5):261–275.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-7843.2005.pto_139.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Namdari S, Baldwin K, Kovatch K, Huffman GR, Glaser D (2012) Fifty most cited articles in orthopedic shoulder surgery. J Shoulder Elb Surg 21(12):1796–1802.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2011.11.040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Malik AT, Noordin S (2018) The top 50 most-cited articles on total ankle arthroplasty: a bibliometric analysis. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 10(1):7498.  https://doi.org/10.4081/or.2018.7498 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mehlman CT, Wenger DR (2006) The top 25 at 25: citation classics in the journal of pediatric orthopaedics. J Pediatr Orthop 26(5):691–694.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.bpo.0000235229.53163.de CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    White-Gibson A, O'Neill B, Cooper D, Leonard M, O'Daly B (2018) Levels of evidence in pelvic trauma: a bibliometric analysis of the top 50 cited papers. Ir J Med Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-018-1818-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Croker N, Lobo A, Croker A, Balogh ZJ, Dewar D (2017) Who, where, what and where to now? A snapshot of publishing patterns in Australian orthopaedic surgery. ANZ J Surg 87(12):1044–1047.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.14177 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hohmann E, Glatt V, Tetsworth K (2017) Orthopaedic research in Australia: a bibliographic analysis of the publication rates in the top 15 journals. ANZ J Surg 87(9):709–713.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.13932 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ahmad SS, Evangelopoulos DS, Abbasian M, Roder C, Kohl S (2014) The hundred most-cited publications in orthopaedic knee research. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96(22):e190.  https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.N.00029 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wickham H (2009) ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Slowikowski K, Irisson J (2016) Repulsive text and label geoms for ‘ggplot2’. https://cran.microsoft.com/snapshot/2017-02-03/web/packages/ggrepel/ggrepel.pdf. Accessed 16 February 2019Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gu Z, Gu L, Eils R, Schlesner M, Brors B (2014) Circlize implements and enhances circular visualization in R. Bioinformatics 30(19):2811–2812.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu393 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Carr AJ, Robertsson O, Graves S, Price AJ, Arden NK, Judge A, Beard DJ (2012) Knee replacement. Lancet 379(9823):1331–1340.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60752-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wang XJ, Xu SQ, Zhou SW, Xu W, Leary M, Choong P, Qian M, Brandt M, Xie YM (2016) Topological design and additive manufacturing of porous metals for bone scaffolds and orthopaedic implants: a review. Biomaterials 83:127–141.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.012 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Choong PF, Dowsey MM, Stoney JD (2009) Does accurate anatomical alignment result in better function and quality of life? Comparing conventional and computer-assisted Total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 24(4):560–569.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2008.02.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Leys T, Salmon L, Waller A, Linklater J, Pinczewski L (2012) Clinical results and risk factors for reinjury 15 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective study of hamstring and patellar tendon grafts. Am J Sports Med 40(3):595–605.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546511430375 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Webster KE, Feller JA, Hartnett N, Leigh WB, Richmond AK (2016) Comparison of patellar tendon and hamstring tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a 15-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med 44(1):83–90.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546515611886 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Culvenor AG, Collins NJ, Guermazi A, Cook JL, Vicenzino B, Whitehead TS, Morris HG, Crossley KM (2016) Early patellofemoral osteoarthritis features one year after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: symptoms and quality of life at three years. Arthritis Care Res 68(6):784–792.  https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.22761 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zbrojkiewicz D, Vertullo C, Grayson JE (2018) Increasing rates of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in young Australians, 2000-2015. Med J Aust 208(8):354–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SICOT aisbl 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of MedicineThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.QIMR Berghofer Medical Research InstituteBrisbaneAustralia
  3. 3.Department of OrthopaedicsMater Health ServicesBrisbaneAustralia
  4. 4.Department of Surgery, Epworth Clinical SchoolThe University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
  5. 5.Biomedical Engineering and Clinical SciencesQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneAustralia
  6. 6.Orthopaedic DepartmentThe Prince Charles HospitalBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations