Advertisement

Proximal femoral nailing is superior to hemiarthroplasty in AO/OTA A2 and A3 intertrochanteric femur fractures in the elderly: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis

  • Prasoon Kumar
  • Rajesh Kumar Rajnish
  • Siddhartha Sharma
  • Mandeep Singh DhillonEmail author
Review Article
  • 30 Downloads

Abstract

Introduction

Unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures in the elderly require either fixation or joint sacrificing surgery; proximal femoral nail (PFN) and bipolar hemiarthroplasties (BPH) are the most common interventions. PFN is considered to be the ideal construct for these fractures; however, the usage of hemiarthroplasties to facilitate earlier mobilization has been on a rise. Currently there is no consensus on the superiority of one of these two techniques over the other and the present review was done to determine this.

Research question

Is PFN a better alternative to BPH for unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures in the elderly?

Objective

The present systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to determine the superiority of PFN over BPH by comparing the primary outcomes like mortality, Harris Hip scores (HHS), complications, and re-operations. Additionally, secondary outcomes like blood loss, duration of surgery, and period of hospital stays were also compared.

Methodology

Three databases of PubMed, EMBASE, and SCOPUS were searched for relevant articles that directly compared PFN and BPH in unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures in the elderly.

Results

We analyzed a total of seven studies published between the years 2005 to 2017. There were four retrospective and three prospective randomized controlled studies. The number of patients in these studies ranged from 53 to 303.

Primary outcomes

There was a significant difference in HHS between two groups with standard mean difference of − 0.51 (range − 0.67 to −0.36), favouring the PFN group. The rate of mortality was higher in the BPH group with odds ratio of 2.07 (range 1.40–3.08). Implant-related complications like fractures and subsidence were more in BPH group but this was not significant.

Secondary outcomes

Mean surgical time (standard mean difference 2.19) and blood loss (3.75) were significantly less in the PFN group. The duration of hospital stay was also found to be significantly less in the PFN group (2.66).

Conclusion

Proximal femoral nails are superior to bipolar hemiarthroplasties for unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures in the elderly. PFN imparts better functional outcomes and has lower rates of overall mortality. Additionally it is faster surgery, with lesser blood loss contributing to better results.

Keywords

Proximal femoral nail PFN Bipolar hemiarthroplasty BPH HHS Unstable intertrochanteric fractures 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Dhanwal DK, Sahoo S, Gautam VK, Saha R (2013) Hip fracture patients in India have vitamin D deficiency and secondary hyperparathyroidism. Osteoporos Int 24(2):553–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sankaran B (2000) Clinical studies: incidence of fracture neck of femur and intertrochanteric fractures in three Delhi hospitals. In: Sankaran B (ed) Osteoporosis. South East Asia Regional Office, World Health Organization, New Delhi, pp 9–18Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lips P (2001) Vitamin D deficiency and secondary hyperparathyroidism in the elderly: consequences for bone loss and fractures and therapeutic implications. Endocr Rev 22:477–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rainfray M, Dehail P, Salles N (2007) Complications of immobility and bed rest. Prevention and management. Rev Prat 57(6):671–676Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Voleti PB, Liu SY, Baldwin KD, Mehta S, Donegan DJ (2015) Intertrochanteric femur fracture stability: a surrogate for general health in elderly patients? Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 6(3):192–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Koval KJ (2007) Intramedullary nailing of proximal femur fractures. Am J Orthop 36 (4 Suppl:4–7Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Erturer RE, Sonmez MM, Sari S, Seckin MF, Kara A, Ozturk I (2012) Intramedullary osteosynthesis of instable intertrochanteric femur fractures with Profin nail in elderly patients. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 46(2):107–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ballal MSG, Emms N, Ramakrishnan M, Thomas G (2008) Proximal femoral nail failures in extracapsular fractures of the hip. J Orthop Surg 16(2):146–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gotze B, Bonnaire F, Weise K, Friedl HP (1998) Belastbahrkeit von Osteosynthesen bei instabilen per-und subtrochanteren Femurfrakturen. Aktuelle Traumatoll 28:197–204Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Boldin C, Seibert FJ, Fankhauser F, Peicha G, Grechenig W, Szyszkowitz R (2003) The proximal femoral nail (PFN) – a minimal invasive treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures: a prospective study of 55 patients with a followup of 15 months. Acta Orthop Scand 74(1):53–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tan BY, Lau AC, Kwek EB (2015) Morphology and fixation pitfalls of a highly unstable intertrochanteric fracture variant. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 23(2):142–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kregor PJ, Obremskey WT, Kreder HJ, Swiontkowski MF (2014) Unstable pertrochanteric femoral fractures. J Orthop Trauma 28(Suppl 8):S25–S28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Temiz A, Durak A, Atici T (2015) Unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures in geriatric patients treated with the DLT trochanteric nail. Injury 46(Suppl 2):S 41–S 46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Park MS, Cho HM, Kim JH, Shin WJ (2013) Cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty using a rectangular cross-section stem for unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Hip Int 23:316–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Grimsrud C, Monzon RJ, Richman J, Ries MD (2005) Cemented hip arthroplasty with a novel cerclage cable technique for unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures. J Arthroplast 20:337–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Singh V, Bhakta P, Zietak E, Hussain A (2016) Bone cement implantation syndrome: a delayed postoperative presentation. J Clin Anesth 31:274–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kim SY, Kim YG, Hwang JK (2005) Cementless calcar-replacement hemiarthroplasty compared with intramedullary fixation of unstable intertrochanteric fractures. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(10):2186–2192Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Desteli EE, İmren Y, Erdoğan M, Aydagün Ö (2015) Quality of life following treatment of trochanteric fractures with proximal femoral nail versus cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty in elderly. Clin Invest Med 38(2):E63–E72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Görmeli G, Korkmaz MF, Görmeli CA, Adanaş C, Karataş T, Şimşek SA (2015) Comparison of femur intertrochanteric fracture fixation with hemiarthroplasty and proximal femoral nail systems. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 21(6):503–508Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Özkayın N, Okçu G, Aktuğlu K (2015) Intertrochanteric femur fractures in the elderly treated with either proximal femur nailing or hemiarthroplasty: a prospective randomised clinical study. Injury 46(Suppl 2):S3–S8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Park BJ, Cho HM, Min WB (2015) A comparison of internal fixation and bipolar hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of reverse oblique intertrochanteric femoral fractures in elderly patients. Hip Pelvis 7(3):152–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tang P, Hu F, Shen J, Zhang L, Zhang L (2012) Proximal femoral nail antirotation versus hemiarthroplasty: a study for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. Injury 43(6):876–881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Esen E, Dur H, Ataoğlu MB, Ayanoğlu T, Turanlı S (2017) Evaluation of proximal femoral nail-antirotation and cemented, bipolar hemiarthroplasty with calcar replacement in treatment of intertrochanteric femoral fractures in terms of mortality and morbidity ratios. Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi 28(1):35–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lindskog DM, Baumgaertner MR (2004) Unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures in the elderly. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 12:179–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Khadgawat R, Brar KS, Gahlo M et al (2010) High prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in Asian-Indian patients with fragility hip fracture: a pilot study. J Assoc Physicians India 58:539–542Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Singh M, Nagrath AR, Maini PS (1970) Changes in trabecular pattern of the upper end of the femur as an index of osteoporosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 52(3):457–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    van Embden D, Rhemrev SJ, Meylaerts SA, Roukema GR (2010) The comparison of two classifications for trochanteric femur fractures: the AO/ASIF classification and the Jensen classification. Injury 41(4):377–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gallagher CA, Jones CW, Kimmel L et al (2019) Osteoarthritis is associated with increased failure of proximal femoral fracture fixation. Int Orthop 43(5):1223–1230CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SICOT aisbl 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of OrthopaedicsPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and ResearchChandigarhIndia

Personalised recommendations